| |
|
| | #1 (permalink) |
| Registered User Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Romania
Posts: 145
| Istari powers - the debate The topic of the debate is: "Did limiting the powers of the Istari by the Valar prolong the war against Sauron? And if so, was it a wise decision of the Valar to limit their powers?" Any Tolkien material can be used, as long as it doesn't contradict The lord of the rings book. The two teams are: The limiters: cornelius, Kelpie, Gwydion. The unlimiters: HieroGlyph, Marky Lazer, Raynor. The debate will last for two weeks, starting today; the limiters will be the first to post. Good luck . |
| | |
| | #3 (permalink) |
| former axe demon Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Belgium
Posts: 847
| Re: Istari powers - the debate well, I think limiting the powers was a good thing, as power often corrupts even the highest and purest of races... being corrupted means they can easily shift from side, turning to into a bigger threath than sauron. I'm sorry, was I supposed to buzz before my reply? |
| | |
| | #4 (permalink) |
| 70% water... Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: Derbyshire
Posts: 376
| Re: Istari powers - the debate Sauron goes way back in time... He's thoroughly an ugly Being. We should send the Istari to confront him fact to face and quench his old shapeshifting, squirming hides into dust! Whats wrong with confronting Sauron head on, power for power? Crush him quick. We dont need an army such as for the Wrath Of The Valar! Unite the Istari and be done with Sauron, I say! |
| | |
| | #5 (permalink) | |||||
| Registered User Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Romania
Posts: 145
| Re: Istari powers - the debate I think that the most powerful argument against the limiting of their powers if found in The Istari, Unfinished Tales: Quote:
Moreover, from Osanwe kenta: Quote:
And now, for a rather important point, found in Laws and customs of the Eldar, HoME X: Quote:
Being subject to fear makes one desire security - I might say more: power to preserver one self or to preseve one's status. Again, I believe that having a "human" body accelerated Saruman's desire for earthly powers - and his demise. For the other wizards - if you suddenly lose your Valinorean stature and assume a condition which is almost unfamiliar with you, you are likely to underperform. According to The third age, RotK: Quote:
At the Council of Elrond, FotR, Gandalf says Quote:
| |||||
| | |
| | #6 (permalink) |
| Ink-stained Wretch Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: California
Posts: 4,574
| Re: Istari powers - the debate But what is 100 years to a Vala or a Maia in full possession of his faculties? Supposing "Olorin" had figured out the whole Dol Guldur situation sooner, would he necessarily have acted any sooner than "Gandalf" did? The Ainur are not without compassion, but when you look at some of the timelines for the events in the Silmarillion, you can see that they allowed Melkor to inflict immense suffering on elves and men between their own sporadic attempts to put an end to his activities. By incarnating in bodies that endure the suffering and sorrows of other beings in Middle Earth as well as some of their limitations, the Istari would become more aware of the passage of time and of the fortunes of individuals within that time. It brought them down into what you might call a more human timescale, so that they would act accordingly. Also, the Valar had essentially washed their hands of Middle Earth when they moved the Blessed Realm beyond the Circles of the World, sending the Istari at all was a last concession on their part. The peoples who lived in Middle Earth needed to learn how to deal with Sauron (or the next oppressor and tyrant who came along) themselves, without relying on the immortals -- who weren't going to intervene again and again on their behalf. So the Istari were sent to teach and advise and inspire, rather than do battle with their old associate Gorthaur the Cruel directly. The spectacle of five Maiar showing up in their own forms and powers to take on Sauron and his minions was not going to teach Iluvatar's mortal children any useful lessons. And the strategy worked, because it wasn't a Gandalf or a Radagast or a Blue Wizard that destroyed the Ring or won the war, it was Men and Hobbits (with a little help on the sidelines from Elves and Dwarves and Ents) who eventually stood up and took care of things themselves. |
| | |
| | #8 (permalink) | |
| 70% water... Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: Derbyshire
Posts: 376
| Re: Istari powers - the debate Quote:
The one thousandth year of Middle-Earth's third age is yet to arrive and we are emissaries with hope to guide the 'mission' of the Heren Istarion... | |
| | |
| | #9 (permalink) | |
| Ink-stained Wretch Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: California
Posts: 4,574
| Re: Istari powers - the debate Quote:
If the Valar just wanted to put down Sauron, they could have sent a Vala like Tulkas to whip his scrawny Maia posterior. | |
| | |
| | #10 (permalink) |
| 70% water... Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: Derbyshire
Posts: 376
| Re: Istari powers - the debate Yes. Sorry. I was just thinking from an 'unlimiters' point of view, i.e. unlimited ability to roll back time to a point where it ISNT decided what the Istari can, are, or will do. If you get my meaning. I'll have to adjust my, er, vocal perspective and use the 'we should have done this to achieve this' kind of debate ![]() |
| | |
| | #11 (permalink) | ||
| Registered User Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Romania
Posts: 145
| Re: Istari powers - the debate Quote:
Quote:
| ||
| | |
| | #12 (permalink) | |||
| Registered User Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Romania
Posts: 145
| Re: Istari powers - the debate (I am sorry for the double posts, perhaps a mod could merge them). I think it is worth recapitulating what happened to all the istari (I am quoting from Letter #156 to R. Murray): Quote:
). But, as it is said, the wizards _failed_. What about the success of Gandalf?Quote:
Quote:
| |||
| | |
| | #13 (permalink) | |
| 70% water... Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: Derbyshire
Posts: 376
| Re: Istari powers - the debate Quote:
The above is more an admission of what the Valar aught to have done, is it not? You've just argued against your teams standing! Well, I have to say, I wasnt thinking of sending a Vala to intervene with Sauron, ney. Five Maia in the form of the Edain, united in purpose. With knowledge of who they are. With knowledge of the spirit within them. Upon an Oath. Call it the Oath of the Istari. Each answerable to the other. There was the White Council, was there not? This idea I have is to extend the powers of that Council. To shape it with a specific purpose. That of opposing the rising of Sauron once that cursed ring HAS been found anew, for it shall be found and it SHALL seek its master, this we know of Saurons power. And this we know of how he subverts all other to his own will. We must oppose that will. We must send the Istari with this sole purpose. And not interfere with the peoples of the Edain that remain nor those others that dwell in Middle-Earth. What say you against such a plan? To limit the Istari to the form of Man, unless at the direst of needs, is folly. Sauron is cruel and patient. Without stronger opposition to his might and cunning we place all the rest of Middle-Earth at risk! | |
| | |
| | #14 (permalink) | |
| Ink-stained Wretch Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: California
Posts: 4,574
| Re: Istari powers - the debate Quote:
Raynor, I still contend that if Gandalf had been thinking as a Maia he would have been, essentially, on Valinor time, and therefore there's no guarantee that he would have acted sooner in regard to Sauron, Saruman, or anything else, even if he had caught on sooner. And may I say that your very argument that the Valar made a mistake just shows that Gandalf as Olorin (a mere Maia) would not necessarily have been as clever about working things out as you indicate. As for actual fighting, yes, Gandalf does fight: to defend himself, his friends, and the people around him -- but not directly against Sauron at the Pelennor Fields or before the Black Gate. And I don't believe Tolkien ever says exactly what part Gandalf and Saruman played when the White Council drove the Necromancer/Sauron out of the Dol Guldur. For all we know, they may simply have been there advising and encouraging Galadriel and the rest. In the end, even coming back with enhanced powers, Gandalf's role is such that he still does his important work through others -- and the very most important thing, the destruction of the Ring, was accomplished through a series of events he set in motion as Gandalf the Grey. I particularly like a phrase in that older Istari thread HieroGlyph resurrected yesterday: that the wizards came as men to be emulated, rather than gods to be worshipped. The Valar were in no hurry to dispose of Sauron -- for one thing, because everything we know about them indicates that they never were in a hurry period. But also, it's pretty obvious that Sauron in and of himself did not seem that important to them. Compared to Morgoth, he was pretty small potatoes. Though a shapeshifter himself, he didn't have his old master's ability to twist other beings into new and hideous shapes -- it wasn't Sauron who turned Elves into Orcs, or manufactured dragons and firedrakes out of ... whatever. He didn't recruit other Maiar to his cause. He couldn't even have made Rings of Power without the help of Celebrimbor and his crew. As far the Valar were concerned, old Thu (as he was once known to his friends and intimates) was probably just a passing dischord in the Music. If they had been that eager to dispose of him, they had the perfect opportunity long before, when he was captured by the Numenorians and taken to Numenor. What could have been easier at that point than extraditing him to Valinor and casting him into the void along with Melkor? They didn't even try. Which either shows that they didn't care -- or that they did care but never quite got around to it (which brings us back to what I said before about Valinor time). The one time that they really sat up and took notice of Sauron's activities was when he seduced the Numenoreans into violating the Ban. Which demonstrates that the one place where Sauron was able to get under their skin was in his ability to corrupt men through their own weaknesses, their own fears. That, so far as the Valar were concerned, was the real danger that he presented: that he might continue to turn men into the paths of evil to their own destruction. And that is the danger the Istari were sent to combat -- Sauron the tempter, the deceiver, the agent of crippling despair. As teachers, advisors, examples, the wizards were there to help men (and other peoples, but particularly men since they were the most vulnerable to him) see through those deceits, abjure those temptations, and resist when resistance seemed most futile. It wasn't a task that could be completed overnight. Nor could it be completed successfully if the Istari took too active a role. | |
| | |
| | #15 (permalink) |
| Ink-stained Wretch Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: California
Posts: 4,574
| Re: Istari powers - the debate We need some of the other participants to jump in here -- this wasn't supposed to be a three person discussion. (And I said from the beginning that I was going to have to limit my involvement.) Come on Cornelius and Gwydion, don't leave me to hold the fort alone! |
| | |
|
| About | Link To Us | For Writers | For Publishers | Privacy | Terms of Use | Copyright | Press | XML/RSS | Contact Us © Copyright Science Fiction Fantasy Chronicles 2003-2008 |