Quote:
Originally Posted by Famfrit  Apparently, it's supposed to be a kinda 'Batman Begins 2' premise, but if thats the case, why couldn't it have been set slightly earlier than the first Batman film?
Bring back Tim Burton! |
Because Batman Begins has no relation to the Burton Batman movies just like 1989 Batman had no relation to the 1966 Batman movie (or the 1943 movie). Burton changed the story and made Joker the killer of Bruce's Parents but in Batman Begins they went back to the original source and made Joe Chill the killer, just a common thug. I can understand the sentimental attachment to the 1989 Batman. I really loved Burton's sets and I think the Joker was done well but I was never sold on Keaton as Batman; he just wasn't scary.