| Re: Conn Iggulden
I understand your points, guys. This is a thread about Conn Iggulden and I was expressing a point about his Roman books. I agree that historical fiction does not have to be accurate to be good. But I felt with Iggulden, unlike Scarrow, that he failed to give the world of the Romans a proper context. Wrong word there probably.
That's just my opinion and I did not mean to insult anyone. |