Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Amber McCaffrey unfortunately perpetuates that view of women. It is not good enough to say 'that is the way things are and it might change soon.' Female science fiction writers can take the step in their own hands by portraying smart, powerful, feminine woman who are strong enough and capable to manage things in their own books.
McCaffrey does not give a proper view of women at all, disappointing as she is one of the most well known. When compared to other science fiction female writers she certainly comes out second best.
Laria could not manage without a man by her side- a disgraceful state to portray things. Are women so totally bound to whoever their latest boyfriend is?
Please don't misunderstand me, I'm not saying that they shouldn't have husbands etc- this is an important side of women that needs to be explored, but I am saying they should be strong enough so that if it is necessary they can manage on their own.
On the other hand this is just my opinion, and I do cantankerous rather well for someone who isn't an old man  |
Are you saying that all female characters in books should be strong, independant and all that? Surely
that isn't a fair representation. Now, I haven't read McCaffrey, so I can't comment specifically, and try to avoid cliche-ridden fantasy series, but its nice and easy to write like that, and sells books
And besides, I'm sure some women are like that, in the same way that some men are totally controlled by whoever their latest girlfriend is... I think the mistake you're making is assuming that one female character represents all women
Like I said, I haven't read McCaffrey, so please correct me if I'm wrong. And I have no intention of getting into discussions about feminism and the like, which I don't really have a very well informed view on
