| | #46 (permalink) | |
| Ever the optimist Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 331
| Re: Daenerys Theory Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #47 (permalink) |
| Registered User Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 104
| Re: Daenerys Theory I think Dany will be fire. I hope she gets less boring. I know that others disagree but she was one of my favorites because she was doing what she had to do to survive and grow. Then she bloomed into a ruler, not when she led but when she burned the witch. That showed the grit and ruthlessness of a leader. Now she's just Polly good shoes and give her any situation and she'll do the right thing. I'm not by any means saying she should become evil, I just think a lot of depth left when she stopped burning and dominating those around her. ![]() On the whole Jon and the wall thing, he's already broken his oaths, or half broken them if you want to qualify his woman as a necessary part of the mission and his running as a not for real escape. It's all noble to stay and fulfill the oath that everyone watching at the wall took but if the watch is destroyed except a few and the kingdom is in ruins it'd be a foolish thing to not betray the oath and go on living. I say just say no to ingrained fantasy notions. There's no honor in fulfilling a dead oath and much good that could be done by Jon living a real life, a life I think he and Sam and all the innocent watch deserve. |
| | |
| | #48 (permalink) |
| AryaUnderfoot Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 881
| Re: Daenerys Theory Asdar, I agree with you that it would be nice to see Dany's character have a bit more depth than it currently does, and a little more action on her part wouldn't hurt either. Right now, it seems like she's going one step forward, two steps back with everything she does. But, I suppose it's all training for being a ruler. With Jon, however, I'd have to disagree about abandoning the oath. Regardless of what's going on in the country, it definitely undermines the importance of the oath if all of the men on the wall go ahead and break it when the sh-- really hits the fan. That's the whole point of swearing the oath- to keep them all together as one, no matter what may come. I don't think their vows should be good only up until a certain part, otherwise why even bother with the whole thing? |
| | |
| | #50 (permalink) |
| Registered User Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: UK: ENGLAND:
Posts: 56
| Re: Daenerys Theory What if Jon is forced to break his oaths somehow. My theory is: The fake Ayra put out there by the lannisters should be near the north by now, she is to marry the bastard of bolton (don't remember his name). Ayra was Jon's favourite sister, he'll hear about the marrage and most likely go to see her. He'll say this isn't Ayra yada yada and kill bastard of bolton and others. King puts a price on his head, Jon flees across the sea. now heres the crap part thats def not gonna happen, he ends up meating Tyron <sp? the imp> and Danny like the earlier post about the the three tang bastards, the three dragon heads. They go back across the sea ally with Sasna by now wife to the heir of the Eyre, ally with Dorne Tyrells? Tyron gets the Rock, Jon Winterfell/Watch. Danny Queen, then they go kick the others ass and it all ends happily ever after. Awww, lol |
| | |
| | #51 (permalink) |
| I Do Not Sow Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Canada
Posts: 2,467
| Re: Daenerys Theory Interesting....You forget that Jon is a bastard AND the Lord Commander of the Night's Watch: a role he takes very, very seriously. Also, Bran is still alive and is the rightful heir to Winterfell. Then there's the issue of Sansa, who I believe is on the verge of making a big move in this game but not as heir to the Eyrie. |
| | |
| | #52 (permalink) | |
| Registered User Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 138
| Re: Daenerys Theory Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #53 (permalink) |
| Morningstar Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 69
| Re: Daenerys Theory How do we know what kind of relationship that Jon has with the Targareyns? I understand it can be assumed that his mother was someone of that ilk, but what evidence is there that they are closely related in any way? |
| | |
| | #54 (permalink) | |
| Registered User Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 138
| Re: Daenerys Theory Quote:
The idea was that Jon was actually Lyanna's child with Rhaegar, that she'd run away by choice, not kidnapped as listed in history. That Eddard had found out and taken Jon back as his own son, in order to protect him. Now though, after AFFC this is most likely wrong, as a witness named Jon's mother and place of birth. Anything's possible though. | |
| | |
| | #55 (permalink) | |
| Boo! Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Ohio
Posts: 357
| Re: Daenerys Theory Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #56 (permalink) |
| Iron Price Payer Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Ohio
Posts: 646
| Re: Daenerys Theory Yes, Edric (Ned) Dayne and Jon shared the same milk mother, Wylla , who Robert believed was Jon's mother. At least thats the story from the lips of Edric, Lord of Starfall, when he spoke to Arya. |
| | |
| | #57 (permalink) |
| Opinionated Procastinator Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: Virginia
Posts: 775
| Re: Daenerys Theory Wow...if you add my post in that said the same thing, that was 3 posts disabusing the Jon's parentage notion in less time that my browser took to refresh...we be on top o things |
| | |
| | #58 (permalink) |
| Boo! Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Ohio
Posts: 357
| Re: Daenerys Theory --- Crackpot theory alert ---- I actually think that Ashra Dayne is still alive and in exile. I also think that she is Quaithe - the lacuqer-masked soothsayer Dany keeps running into from time to time. |
| | |
| | #59 (permalink) | |
| Boo! Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Ohio
Posts: 357
| Re: Daenerys Theory Quote:
Oops - double post. My bad. | |
| | |
| | #60 (permalink) | |
| Iron Price Payer Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Ohio
Posts: 646
| Re: Daenerys Theory Quote:
or a wink . Do please tell!!! | |
| | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Rate This Thread | |
| |