| | #1 (permalink) |
| Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: USA:
Posts: 2,234
| Symbolism The Symbolism Survey - famous authors talk about symbolism. "Do you have anything to remark concerning the subject under study, or anything you believe to be pertinent to such study?" |
| | |
| | #2 (permalink) | |
| Wherever I Am, I'm There | Re: Symbolism Quote:
Similarly, I'd say the continued discussions over films such as The Matrix and Bladerunner long after their sell-by dates is due to their symbolism (particularly the origami horse and chessboard in Bladerunner.) Very often, I'm sure the symbolism in some films was not intended or not concious, but what Director would say he hadn't carefully considered these deeper meanings when he made the film. It is surprising how honest those authors were in their replies. | |
| | |
| | #3 (permalink) | |||
| Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: USA:
Posts: 2,234
| Re: Symbolism Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
| |||
| | |
| | #4 (permalink) |
| Wherever I Am, I'm There | Re: Symbolism Sorry, my bad... it was a Unicorn. Authors obviously do use symbolism, but I'm sure they don't use it as much as your "critic/teachers" claim they do. I admit that I did very badly in my 'o' Level English Literature, however I still find it hard to believe what my teachers and the Study Guides told me; that William Shakespeare and Thomas Hardy really put all that symbolism into what they wrote. I'm sure that the equivalent of an 'urban myth' grows up over time in these things. It also strikes me as a case of the Emperor's New Clothes. |
| | |
| | #5 (permalink) |
| Registered User Join Date: Mar 2012 Location: New York
Posts: 144
| Re: Symbolism Thanks for passing this along; it's wonderful. The answer that rings most true for me is Ralph Ellison's, and Bradbury seems to me to echo it somewhat: A writer writes and then reads what s/he has written and if s/he recognizes something symbolic, uses it or doesn't. (And may not recognize something as symbolic, though readers just might. Remember, the author doesn't know everything.) I think for many, if not most, writers the idea for a story comes first and the ideas about what the story can expand into comes after the initial writing, the act of writing stoking the imagination. A lot of writers have said something along the lines of, 'I'm not a writer, I'm a re-writer'; the story doesn't usually come all at once, it accretes from tinkering with it, from adding here and subtracting there, moving this piece to that place, sanding off the spurs on the transition, plugging the hole where it came from, shoring up the part left behind. In the process the writer aware of symbolism and in favor of that symbolism will write to strengthen and support it. Randy M. |
| | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Rate This Thread | |
| |