| | #16 (permalink) |
| Mad Mountain Man | Re: dashes Yes Ursa and that's where I have a problem with the 'proper' usage. To me at least it visually attaches the first and last words of the interruption to the surrounding expression that it's supposed to be separating them from. I know it's right, it's just that it jars with me visually when I'm reading it. My mind seems to do a mental "eh?" everytime I come across it printed that way. Something I just have to live with I guess. |
| | |
| | #17 (permalink) |
| Bearly Believable Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: UK: ENGLAND:
Posts: 12,047
| Re: dashes I don't like m-dashes used in that way either, and for the same reason. As I've said elsewhere, I prefer my dashes - n-dashes, obviously - to be paired. One usage of the m-dash is, apparently, as a more visually noticeable replacement for the colon, which guarantees the use of a single m-dash. (No-one's suggested replacing semi-colons with n-dashes; that could only lead to war....) But at least neither of us have been forced to use them that way (unless you've got an agent or editor you haven't mentioned). |
| | |
| | #18 (permalink) | ||
| Mad Mountain Man | Re: dashes Don't want to worry you Ursa but I came across this in my wanderings: Quote:
Quote:
| ||
| | |
| | #19 (permalink) | ||
| Banishment this world! | Re: dashes Quote:
Maybe neither way is wrong, it just feels wrong to me I guess. Quote:
| ||
| | |
| | #21 (permalink) | |
| Mad Mountain Man | Re: dashes I think you might be right that it is changing - though I'#m not so sure it's gone as far as preferred. Certainly in older books I've read (Wells, Conan Doyle, Verne, Wodehouse etc.) it always seems to appear with no spaces whether it is paired or not. In more modern books I have seen paired dashes appearing both with and without; not too sure which I see more often though. I would add though that the same web page I quoted above goes on to say: Quote:
| |
| | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Rate This Thread | |
| |