| | #106 (permalink) | |
| Wherever I Am, I'm There | Re: Prometheus (2012) discussion - *SPOILERS!* Quote:
Independence Day (1996) (but not until around page 6 and the lists of the 78 cliches it uses.) I'm not sure why you keep mentioning Independence Day in comparison as that is hardly an intelligent film itself. Some films are easy to pick holes in. Why not compare it with Inception? That plot was so complicated that you felt sure Nolan would have slipped up somewhere as they jumped between the levels of the dream, but it was difficult to find fault with it because he had obviously spent some considerable time making sure that it worked. Why not compare it with 2001: A Space Odyssey? Now, there you have a film that is extremely difficult to follow, and incomprehensible to many unless they have read the book, but the narrative still follows some logic and the characters do not suddenly change tack. | |
| | |
| | #107 (permalink) |
| Prehistoric Irish Cynic Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: California
Posts: 1,687
| Re: Prometheus (2012) discussion - *SPOILERS!* Well, now that most of the heated discussion seems to be over, I can only offer this: http://screencrush.com/prometheus-en...-dead-ringers/ |
| | |
| | #108 (permalink) |
| Senior Member Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: Colorado
Posts: 359
| Re: Prometheus (2012) discussion - *SPOILERS!* Well, I've read some of the postings, skipped a number of others. I might express similar opinions of posts in the middle somewhere, if so, sorry guys, eyes started glazing over on some. Anyways, I hadn't noticed anyone making a speculation that the "engineers" that were found on LV-233, or whichever designation that planet, excuse me, moon, is,were not the life forms that populated Earth, and maybe even a planet that spawned marble skinned nine foot tall human life. maybe its possible that the engineers had found the stash of primordial soup, and were starting to travel the galaxy, removing life forms, and replacing them with something else. I don't remember a sub title on the screen at the beginning that SAID the planet being shown was Earth, so it could have been a totally different planet being "populated" whatever. Overall I found the movie was a 'one off' from being prequel, The moon landed on was not the one the crew of Nostromo landed on, the Ship that did leave the moon went right back down, and could not launch again. the ship Android and Doctor took, in all likelihood did not land on that moon, because the space Jockey is way different size, and I doubt they tried to wake a cryo frozen one on the new ship. very likely that ship had been lost for millennia etc... Also the Aliens we all knew previously had a decidedly male setup, back of their heads looked like shall we say male parts, where the altered worm looked remarkably like girl parts. the similarities in propogation do point that there is a similar start point, but the differences say a divergence in natural selection whatever from what was founf in Prometheus, and discovered in Alien. Unfortunately plot holes, science skipped, etc... can only really be explained as "because it was in the script" after all Ridley Scott made the movie, not Carl Sagan, Stephen Hawkings, and Isaac Asimov, with a think tank helping with details. of course if that was the case I'd avoid THAT movie unless I had insomnia. personally I found the movie decent. Yeah a bit light on explanations and plot more closely resembling hopscotch at times, but for the regular masses, lots of horror, WEIRD aliens, death, zombies, etc... |
| | |
| | #109 (permalink) |
| Brian G. Turner | Re: Prometheus (2012) discussion - *SPOILERS!* Watched this on Saturday night. What. An. Awful. Film. Lovely visuals, but awful script with no continuity. It was like watching one of those awful cheap zombie movies, where different people wander off just to die horribly, and nothing makes sense. - taking their helmets off just because the air is breathable, with no concern of being infected by pathogens, or polluting the environment with their own? - people wandering off by themselves for no reason other than to die horribly - someone is burned to death, only to inexplicably become a rampant zombie to kill load of people - the robot spontaneously decides to place a fragment of tissue in someone's drink, knowing it will enter his semen and impregnate his girlfriend with a squid monster - said squid monster, in the space of a few hours confined in a lab, suddenly turns into a giant monster - headless robot is fully aware of exactly what is happening to everyone else, despite no comms link, and is able to chat to them - when faced with a deadly object rolling towards them, no one thinks to run aside, but instead to run along its direct path! - too many little issues!! Also, this film has nothing to do with Alien, except for a 30 second epilogue that was incredibly weak. Think they added that in because they realised they'd be accused of using Alien as an inspiration, even though nothing in the film relates to it, except that poor poor epilogue. All in all, a very pointless film. Really can't believe Ridley Scott put his name to it, unless he's gone senile. |
| | |
| | #111 (permalink) |
| Senior Member Join Date: Dec 2011 Location: Greater London
Posts: 991
| Re: Prometheus (2012) discussion - *SPOILERS!* Well, I finally managed to get round to watching this over the Xmas break. I feel like the only person on the site to have not seen it till this late. Thankfully I hadn't been enthused about seeing the film (too old and cynical to trust something that is described as a prequel), otherwise I would have been sorely dissappointed. Thus I can only muster an apathetic shrug. T'was incoherent and jumbled. I believe it was an attempt to explain the space jockey - but it just multiplied the questions and mysteries by two. Didn't even line up with Alien that well, and is effectively a re-boot of the Alien franchise that kinda pushes the excellent sequel Aliens into non-canon/discord/alternative time line, which is a shame as Alien/Aliens made sense. Anyhoo, Happy new year everyone and hope Crimbo just been has been a lot of fun. |
| | |
| | #112 (permalink) | |
| Registered User Join Date: Jan 2013 Location: California
Posts: 62
| Re: Prometheus (2012) discussion - *SPOILERS!* My comments in Bold... Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #113 (permalink) | |||
| Senior Member Join Date: Dec 2011 Location: Greater London
Posts: 991
| Re: Prometheus (2012) discussion - *SPOILERS!* Hi SpanishMill, I struggled for a day or two with a lot of inconsistencies with the movie but after having a look through the interweb and having a look at what Ridly Scott has said, the reason it's all over the place makes a bit more sense. Someone mentioned the Golden Compass in the thread and the comparison is apt. RS definitely has a sequel to Prometheus in mind, (Elizabeth's journey to the home of the engineers, paradise), but I believe he wasn't sure that he could get a green light for that one. So he tried to make Prometheus as standalone as he could. Furthermore I believe he has stated that to make a bridge to Alien, he'd have to make another sequel on top of that - thus making a trilogy. So perhaps we have another film like the Golden Compass which is part one of a trilogy that may never be made. Quote:
But the scene is there to show what the engineers do - which is spread life among the planets of the universe. RS talks about Aztec/Maya creation myths/practices where kings or princes were all powerful for a year but then were sacrificed to the gods to sustain vegetation/life as his motif or thinking about the engineers. Here he protrays it literally - the engineer altruristically sacrifices himself to kickstart life on the planet (whatever planet that happens to be). Quote:
Quote:
| |||
| | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| |