Go Back   Science Fiction Fantasy Chronicles: forums > Books and Writing > Aspiring Writers > General Writing Discussion

General Writing Discussion For aspiring writers of science fiction and fantasy to discuss issues of writing.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread
Old 31st May 2012, 10:40 PM   #61 (permalink)
This world is not my home
 
Parson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Iowa
Posts: 3,241
Blog Entries: 5
Re: Grammar checker rant

Every job has its jargon. But since I've been writing sermons and taking exegetical notes for twenty plus years now. Seldom do I get the squiggle that used to dominate my papers.
Parson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st June 2012, 02:09 AM   #62 (permalink)
Summon Beer Elemental!
 
David Evil Overlord's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Australia, Victoria
Posts: 1,624
Blog Entries: 44
Re: Grammar checker rant

You can't have spaghetti bolognese. Word insists on you capitalise Bolognese, even if the spaghetti that goes with it is lower case uncapitalised.

And neanderthal must be capitalised. Really? So every time I write the word "human" I should capitalise that, too?

And please do not try this at home -- any more. No matter how you try to word it, "any more" must be anymore.

Word is a four-letter word.
David Evil Overlord is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd June 2012, 03:57 AM   #63 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Jennifer Cthulus's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Monaco
Posts: 17
Re: Grammar checker rant

Quote:
Originally Posted by David Evil Overlord View Post
And please do not try this at home -- any more. No matter how you try to word it, "any more" must be anymore.
Heh. My international English spellcheck refuses to accept "anymore" as a single word. Firefox is underlining it in red as I type this. Must be a US English thing.
Jennifer Cthulus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd June 2012, 01:13 PM   #64 (permalink)
Mad Mountain Man
 
Vertigo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Highland
Posts: 3,939
Blog Entries: 15
Re: Grammar checker rant

Quote:
Originally Posted by David Evil Overlord View Post
You can't have spaghetti bolognese. Word insists on you capitalise Bolognese, even if the spaghetti that goes with it is lower case uncapitalised.

And neanderthal must be capitalised. Really? So every time I write the word "human" I should capitalise that, too?

And please do not try this at home -- any more. No matter how you try to word it, "any more" must be anymore.

Word is a four-letter word.
On the 'anymore' front take a look at this: http://alt-usage-english.org/anymore.html

On the captialising human thing I was thingking about this recently and it seems to me the SF world has a little trouble with consistency here. If we ever expand out into the stars and meet another intelligent race lets say the Grams from the planet Ergat then are humans and our empire:

1. humans and the Human Empire
2. Humans and the Human Empire
3. Earthmen and the Earth Empire
4. Terrans and the Terran Empire
5. mankind and the Empire of Man
6. Mankind and the Empire of Man

and are the Grams:
1. Grams and the Gram Empire
2. grams and the Gram Empire
3. Ergatans and the Ergatan Empire
4. And...

How come in SF only we seem to have multiple names for ourselves, whilst aliens always have to put up with just one name usually based on the name of their planet. Certainly we always seem to capitalise the aliens name but not our own (if we use human or mankind).
Vertigo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd June 2012, 01:45 PM   #65 (permalink)
www.sjswebdesign.co.uk
 
Leisha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Dundee City
Posts: 2,788
Blog Entries: 2
Re: Grammar checker rant

My Word is set to British English, but it ALWAYS tries to get me to write "anymore".

--------------------------------------

Great thread, btw!

It took me a long time before I felt confident enough to remove the grammar checker (before that I'd just switched off *some* of the options, like punctuation and passive voice and fragments and such). I'm a serial fragmenter, which doesn't go down well in Word. I'm also a lover of semicolons, and in my recent short story I've taken to using comma splices for effect, too, which Word HATES... Oh! and Word always highlights parts *aren't* passive, which annoys me no end! So I only keep the spell checker on now...

However, out of curiosity I switched it on to see what it would say about three of the stories I'm working on:



She flopped onto the couch = She flipped onto the couch [Very acrobatic!]

He notched an arrow into his bow, contemplating whether he could loose it into the man’s head from this distance. = He notched an arrow into his bow, contemplating whether he could lose it into the man’s head from this distance.

...and wore an umber helmet = ...and wore a number helmet

The village was neither alive nor dead – it lingered ghostlike, its glorious past long gone, its future stillborn. = The village was neither alive nor dead – it lingered ghostlike, it's glorious past long gone, its future stillborn.

He’d bet his whole damn = He’d bet his completely damn

It was a gaze he’d seen in the animals he hunted... = He'd seen a gaze in the animals he hunted...

Praying it didn’t have water damage, she flicked the screen to life... = Praying it didn’t have water damage; she flicked the screen to life...

The man lay ahead, his gaze to the sky = The man laid ahead, his gaze to the sky

She closed her eyes, let her limbs and head rest, though with... = She closed her eyes, let her limbs and headrest, though with...

...richly detailed and gleaming. = ...richly detailed and gleaming do.

They’ll find out you lied, and then... = They’ll find out you laid, and then...

‘I don’t underst—’= ‘I don’t undress—’

The pipe ended to much applause. = The pipe ended too much applause. [I might add the comma in since I've been debating it, although I preferred the flow without...]
Leisha is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th June 2012, 10:29 PM   #66 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Boneman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: West Sussex
Posts: 3,506
Re: Grammar checker rant

Leisha, I think your computer is obsessed with sex! Hi to you both, hope things are okay for you.

Every time I say "he felt for all the world like a complete idiot"
I get "he felt for the entire world like a complete idiot"
"The splash was enormous. Which gave me an idea" became
"The splash was enormous. Which gave me an idea?"

Hah! It can't even agree with itself!! "looking as though they'd laid down to sleep" became "looking as though they'd lay down to sleep", but when I accepted it, it then came up with "looking as though they'd lie down to sleep"... machines and logic, eh?
Boneman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th June 2012, 10:47 PM   #67 (permalink)
resident pedantissimo
 
chrispenycate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 5,375
Blog Entries: 9
Re: Grammar checker rant

Look. they make programs for Macs to make them simulate PCs, right? { Starts sentence with a conjunction.}And Mac simulators for Windows? What I have gathered from this thread is that the world needs a universal binary Chrispy simulator, with a strong desire to leave people's words as close to what they hear as possible, a homophone detector and a repunctuation gizmo. Preferably incorporating the atrocious sense of humour{Fragment}.

After all I'm about the simplest. most straightforward software existing to run on a human brain, so it would be a worthwhile exercise.

Turing test?{Fragment} I doubt whether I'd pass it. { Starts sentence with a conjunction.}And with the touring test, I'd get the written exam, and doubtless the oral. Just creaking a bit too much for the practical{ Fragment}.
chrispenycate is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th June 2012, 11:38 PM   #68 (permalink)
Bearly Believable
 
Ursa major's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: UK: ENGLAND:
Posts: 12,047
Re: Grammar checker rant

Quote:
Originally Posted by Leisha View Post
...and in my recent short story I've taken to using comma splices for effect, too, which Word HATES...
So Word isn't completely useless, then?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Boneman View Post
Hah! It can't even agree with itself!! "looking as though they'd laid down to sleep" became "looking as though they'd lay down to sleep", but when I accepted it, it then came up with "looking as though they'd lie down to sleep"... machines and logic, eh?
Shouldn't this be:
Quote:
looking as though they'd lain down to sleep
Laid is the past participle of the verb, to lay = 'deposit' or 'place in recumbent posture', as in 'he lays the book on the desk', or 'he laid the book on the desk', or 'he had laid the book on the desk'.

Lain is the past participle of the verb, to lie = '(Of person or animal) have one's body in more or less horizontal position along ground or surface', hence 'I lie on the ground', 'I have lain on the ground', 'I lay on the ground', or 'I had lain on the ground'.

It seems to me that the 'they' in your sentence had not, at some point in the past, decided to lay something on the ground, but had decided to lie on the ground, in order to get some sleep.
Ursa major is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 8th June 2012, 12:36 AM   #69 (permalink)
Summon Beer Elemental!
 
David Evil Overlord's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Australia, Victoria
Posts: 1,624
Blog Entries: 44
Re: Grammar checker rant

Just had my teenage superhero thinking, "I was shaking so much, I could have whipped cream with my bare hands."*

Word insists the comma should be replaced with a semicolon. "I was shaking so much; I could have whipped cream with my bare hands."

Leisha, I have also had adventures with Word insisting my teenage super hero shouldn't have lied her way out of trouble, she should have laid her way out of trouble. Honestly, why does Word think she's that kind of girl?

*No, that's not one of her powers.

Last edited by David Evil Overlord; 8th June 2012 at 12:36 AM. Reason: Eeek! Almost at 1000 posts!
David Evil Overlord is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th June 2012, 01:46 PM   #70 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Boneman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: West Sussex
Posts: 3,506
Re: Grammar checker rant

Quote:
Originally Posted by chrispenycate View Post
Look. they make programs for Macs to make them simulate PCs, right? { Starts sentence with a conjunction.}And Mac simulators for Windows? What I have gathered from this thread is that the world needs a universal binary Chrispy simulator, with a strong desire to leave people's words as close to what they hear as possible, a homophone detector and a repunctuation gizmo. Preferably incorporating the atrocious sense of humour{Fragment}.

After all I'm about the simplest. most straightforward software existing to run on a human brain, so it would be a worthwhile exercise.

Turing test?{Fragment} I doubt whether I'd pass it. { Starts sentence with a conjunction.}And with the touring test, I'd get the written exam, and doubtless the oral. Just creaking a bit too much for the practical{ Fragment}.
Perfect!! I laughed out loud at this, and forwarded it to Microsoft...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ursa major View Post
So Word isn't completely useless, then?


Shouldn't this be:


Laid is the past participle of the verb, to lay = 'deposit' or 'place in recumbent posture', as in 'he lays the book on the desk', or 'he laid the book on the desk', or 'he had laid the book on the desk'.

Lain is the past participle of the verb, to lie = '(Of person or animal) have one's body in more or less horizontal position along ground or surface', hence 'I lie on the ground', 'I have lain on the ground', 'I lay on the ground', or 'I had lain on the ground'.

It seems to me that the 'they' in your sentence had not, at some point in the past, decided to lay something on the ground, but had decided to lie on the ground, in order to get some sleep.
But they were all dead by the time my hero sees them. What's a past participle...?
Boneman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th June 2012, 03:50 PM   #71 (permalink)
Bearly Believable
 
Ursa major's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: UK: ENGLAND:
Posts: 12,047
Re: Grammar checker rant

Are you suggesting that after they lay down, someone else laid them to rest...?
Ursa major is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 8th June 2012, 03:52 PM   #72 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Boneman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: West Sussex
Posts: 3,506
Re: Grammar checker rant

Possibly... they've been dead five centuries, so the post-mortem is inconclusive...
Boneman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th June 2012, 04:14 PM   #73 (permalink)
Bearly Believable
 
Ursa major's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: UK: ENGLAND:
Posts: 12,047
Re: Grammar checker rant

Let's hope they're not cut up about that.









(By the way, I hope you're not lying about any of this. )
Ursa major is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 8th June 2012, 06:17 PM   #74 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Boneman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: West Sussex
Posts: 3,506
Re: Grammar checker rant

Lieing? Moi? Nope, I was editing, and came across the red underlining, which I'd previously ignored... it's quite a pivotal scene, as well!
Boneman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th June 2012, 08:21 PM   #75 (permalink)
<3D~
 
Mouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Somerset
Posts: 6,225
Blog Entries: 19
Re: Grammar checker rant

My grammar checker told me I can't use 'pretty blonde girls.' Apparently I have to use 'blonde girls.'
Mouse is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:05 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2 ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.