| | #1 (permalink) |
| Senior Member Join Date: May 2006 Location: Durham
Posts: 634
| Using BRANDs in your work. General opinion, I have a question. Can you use name brands in your work? Such as IPOD. McDonnalds. Matalan. KFC. Morrisons. Is it allowed as long as you don't slander them without warrent? |
| | |
| | #6 (permalink) |
| Future ruler of the world Join Date: Sep 2011 Location: Lincolnshire
Posts: 247
| Re: Using BRANDs in your work. I've actually been told using brand names enhances your work. It's not a car, it's an Astin Martin. They're not drinking soda, they're drinking Coca Cola... Just little thngs that adds flavour to the world. |
| | |
| | #7 (permalink) | ||
| Banishment this world! | Re: Using BRANDs in your work. Quote:
Quote:
Here is a blog on the legal side of things that you have to worry about. You had it right that as long as your not bashing the brand and putting it down, your fine to use it. Last edited by Warren_Paul; 26th March 2012 at 08:37 PM. | ||
| | |
| | #8 (permalink) |
| Elf in Space Join Date: Apr 2012 Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 324
| Re: Using BRANDs in your work. Hmmm.... Interesting thread. I've never had a qualm about using brand names, but I just used "Coke" in a dystopian future where all business are either owned by or under the thumb of one of twelve dukes. The context implicitly makes all brands evil. Going to have to give this a bit of thought. |
| | |
| | #9 (permalink) | |
| Senior Member Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Texas
Posts: 371
| Re: Using BRANDs in your work. Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #11 (permalink) |
| Senior Member | Re: Using BRANDs in your work. Very interesting thread. I've been 'reversing' famous brands in my novel based in the future e.g. Macrohard; “Everything’s peachy with an iBall,” Sang Archie, waving his arms like a demented tic-tac man on Grand National Day, lampooning the actor in the iBall advert. The slogan was now the most well known and most irritating advertising tagline on Earth. The competing product from Macrohard, called ‘The Pear’, was greeted with derision. Their slogan, ‘Everything’s Gone Pear Shaped,’ became an embarrassing millstone around their corporate neck. Could I be sued by Microsoft, or is parody an accepted form of expression? TBO |
| | |
| | #13 (permalink) |
| Maniac Braniac Join Date: Sep 2011 Location: Minnesota
Posts: 231
| Re: Using BRANDs in your work. I agree with the added flavor. Consider this, when a comedian uses name brands like Toyota, instead of: a car, it's always more comical. I always try and use name brand guns, and cars, because it gives the reader a visual of the scene, and also I believe offers up that the character knows what they are doing. If I had a marksman say he cleaned his M24, instead just cleaning his gun, it makes him sound like a true professional, and not just a hobby of his. My two cents. |
| | |
| | #14 (permalink) | |
| #452 Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Cardiff
Posts: 914
| Re: Using BRANDs in your work. Quote:
I'm not a lawyer, but I believe it's down to what the average person would interpret from the parody/satire. In your examples 'most irritating advertising tagline' and 'embarrassing millstone' are more poking fun at the marketing practices rather than the actual brands; as such I would be inclined to say you would get away with it. One thing to consider - If it's enough to cast doubt in a publisher/agents mind they might avoid the story rather than go through the effort of checking it; especially for a new author. I found the following link which might be of use http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Parody | |
| | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Rate This Thread | |
| |