| | #1 (permalink) |
| Reetou Diplomatic Corp Join Date: May 2001 Location: North-west UK
Posts: 3,799
| Notwithstanding systematic errors, the LHC at CERN may have inadvertently transmitted neutrinos slightly faster than the speed of light... http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-15017484 |
| | |
| | #2 (permalink) |
| resident pedantissimo | Re: Ye cannae change the laws of physics Just what I needed. A whole batch of second-hand trinoes going on holiday to Italy just under my feet, and do they respect the speed limit? It's not as if it takes them that long to get there at 300,000 kM/sec. (Now, parking when they get there, that's a whole different kettle of spaghetti). |
| | |
| | #4 (permalink) |
| Never Sure | Re: Ye cannae change the laws of physics Wow! Of all the things that could send the physics model completely back to the drawing board, it turns out to be the humble, innocuous little neutrino! Couple that with not finding the Higgs Boson and -- after only a year and still at only half power -- the LHC appears to be giving more than its money's worth, just not quite in the way expected ... Last edited by RJM Corbet; 22nd September 2011 at 09:10 PM. |
| | |
| | #5 (permalink) | |
| П | Re: Ye cannae change the laws of physics It's probably as the team at CERN said, an information error, but if not, it would mean new text books all round. Not to mention possibilities for the SF field. Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #6 (permalink) | |
| Senior Member Join Date: Sep 2011 Location: Moray
Posts: 2,006
| Re: Ye cannae change the laws of physics Quote:
I've had to read the name of every bird in the Collins Birdbook every night before he goes to bed for about six months now. | |
| | |
| | #7 (permalink) |
| vast and cool Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: Washington
Posts: 745
| Re: Ye cannae change the laws of physics Hot topic on the forums. 60 nanoseconds is just such a small amount of time it does seem like it could easily be a mistake. Another related article. Dimension-hop may allow neutrinos to cheat light speed. |
| | |
| | #10 (permalink) | |
| Never Sure | Re: Ye cannae change the laws of physics Quote:
A 'neutrino year' would be 231 475 000 kilometers further than a light year. The dimension thing looks good though, if the finding is correct. It has already been carefully checked for years by people who know pretty much what they're doing ...? | |
| | |
| | #11 (permalink) |
| vast and cool Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: Washington
Posts: 745
| Re: Ye cannae change the laws of physics No doubt it's fast (only a few orders of magnitude faster and inter-stellar travel becomes a reality ), my only point is that incredibly fast speeds measured over relatively tiny distances, making the differences in elapsed time extremely small, could easily be done incorrectly. But I'm hoping for the dimensional hop theory myself. |
| | |
| | #14 (permalink) |
| Mad Mountain Man | Re: Ye cannae change the laws of physics It is a very exciting announcement though the difference is not exactly going to see a tour of the galaxy taking a mere year or two. However (sadly) I think it far, far more likely that it will eventually turn out to be a systemic error that they have missed, as they themselves suspect. Remember it is not a direct comparison with the speed of light as they can't actually mearsure light travelling the same path (due to rather a lot of rock in the way). So, for example, how was the exact distance between the two points established and how many alterntive methods of establishing that distance were used. I'm not saying that is the problem but there are countless things like that involved in this sort of experiment and it is easy to miss some. |
| | |
| | #15 (permalink) |
| Never Sure | Re: Ye cannae change the laws of physics Richard Feynman's 'sum of all possibilities' means that a single photon of light takes all possible paths, to arrive at the detector at exactly the same time, but in fact averages out having chosen the shortest route. It's a graph with time running vertically and distance horizontally. Simplified, the photon travels in all possible curves to reach the fixed detector in a straight line, so the vertical destination is the same regardless of the horizontal movement. So light speed is the average of all the speeds at which the photon of light that we detect has actually traveled. It's Schrodinger's cat. It's everywhere, until you look at it. A positron, or anti-electron, is an electron with the sign reversed, including the time sign, so anti matter can be expressed in the mathematics (I believe) one way as matter moving backwards in time. At electron level, time is a very malleable thing. Also, light-speed is measured in vacuo. It travels slower through air or water or glass, and not at all through a brick wall. But neutrinos aren't slowed by anything. Perhaps some very small percentage of neutrinos are refracted somehow to travel ex vacuo through these extra dimensions proposed by string theory, and an even smaller percentage re-emerge? We'll see ... Last edited by RJM Corbet; 25th September 2011 at 12:27 AM. |
| | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Rate This Thread | |
| |