| | #961 (permalink) | |
| Creepy | Re: Quick Fire Questions (A Place to Ask and Answer) Quote:
I read it as: '... to lull people into a sense of -- not trust [there's a silent 'exactly' for me about here], but comfort.' | |
| |
| | #962 (permalink) |
| Truth. Order. Moderation. | Re: Quick Fire Questions (A Place to Ask and Answer) Bugger. Damn machine just dumped my post. Grrr. Try again. springs, how about using an ellipsis, or even two? That would then give the impression of the narrator searching for the correct word(s): "... into a sense of... not trust... but comfort." I agree with Hex about the possibility of italicising "trust" and/or adding an "exactly". I wouldn't do any further tinkering with the sentence, though -- it's fine as it is. As for long dashes, they serve two functions (at least they do when I use them...). The first is in place of a colon or semi-colon where a following subclause is so closely linked to the preceding clause that you don't want a complete sentence break with a full stop, but a comma isn't enough eg as in the final sentence in the paragraph above. The other is to act as parentheses -- the posh term for brackets ie ( ) -- inside which is an explanatory or qualifying clause. I think people can be relied on to understand which is which, from the rhythm of the writing. But don't be tempted (as I've done too often...) to have both types of long dash in the same sentence, as it does get a little complicated at that point. |
| |
| | #963 (permalink) |
| Dramatically tremendous | Re: Quick Fire Questions (A Place to Ask and Answer) okay, very helpful. I don't want to change the sentence itself, I like it, and it suits the character. I like the trust highlighted, and think that implies the exactly idea, which is the sense of what I wanted to get across. And double types of dashes, in one sentence. Crikey. I'm not anywhere near that, your honour. At least another half million words to go, first. |
| |
| | #964 (permalink) |
| Senior Member Join Date: Dec 2011 Location: Greater London
Posts: 991
| Re: Quick Fire Questions (A Place to Ask and Answer) Hey springs, After a nights sleep (it was late when I posted the last one) and thinking about this a little bit this morning, I assume you want to use trust & comfort because I guess 'lulling someone into a false sense of security' is one of those screaming cliches that practically all writing books/courses/tutors paint in large red letters 'WARNING: On no account ever use'. Thus I can see your angle of attack better now. TJ's suggestion, if that was the intent, seems a bit cleaner to my eyes. But if that's the case I suppose there is some sort of slight jarring with the tenses at that bit. In that she knew that he was manipulating people to do something, but then what she knew requires her to think for the correct term in the present would seem a bit odd. Would 'she could see that this was partly deliberate...' or 'she sensed this was partly deliberate...' be better? And here's another variant that's popped into my mind! '...she knew this was partly deliberate, to lull people into a sense of...well, not trust as many thought...but comfort.' --- I'm still struggling to connect why looking younger = endearing trust/comfort in people, but that might be explained in the passage around about it. |
| |
| | #965 (permalink) | |||
| Bearly Believable Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: UK: ENGLAND:
Posts: 12,045
| Re: Quick Fire Questions (A Place to Ask and Answer) The problem I saw was that the verb, lull, immediately suggests (at least to me**) the words, false security, which means that it may be jarring when the word, trust, appears in their place. This further suggests, again to me, that one ought to either go on with the cliché and get it out of the way, or use a different verb. (There are a number that might serve: inculcate being one: Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
EDIT: the verb, lull, also has negative connotations, which further jars with the words comfort and trust. PS. I'm in two minds as to whether I should be "...imbuing people with a" or "...imbuing in people a..." ** - In this context: I don't necessarily think of false security when a lull in a storm is mentioned. *** - Beware different spellings (instil/instill) either side of the Pond. . Last edited by Ursa major; 17th March 2012 at 01:48 PM. | |||
| |
| | #966 (permalink) |
| Senior Member Join Date: Dec 2011 Location: Greater London
Posts: 991
| Re: Quick Fire Questions (A Place to Ask and Answer) Good calls Ursa, You had me rushing to the dictionary with Inculcate, great word! It's seems a bit aggressive for this doe eyed boy though, so the other two softer options convey his actions a bit better. |
| |
| | #972 (permalink) |
| Dramatically tremendous | Re: Quick Fire Questions (A Place to Ask and Answer) Oh, dear, the thread has gone down hill.... That's sort of why I used lull in the first place, because it's what he does, lulls people into a sense of he is what he isn't. The reader very quickly learns that he's actually not in the least innocent, nor naive, nor stupid. And why I wanted the emphasis slightly on trust - he can be trusted, at least - but not comfort. so if the lull knocks it out a little, I'm thinking that mightn't be a bad thing. |
| |
| | #973 (permalink) |
| Banishment this world! | Re: Quick Fire Questions (A Place to Ask and Answer) Quick medical question here. What would be the symptoms of a linear skull fracture? I've got a character that has suffered trauma to the head from a blunt object, and thought I'd have it resulting in a minor linear skull fracture, since I should be able to get away with the character not absolutely requiring hospitalization. Correct? I know there is of course the effects of concussion. Also that bleeding can happen from the eyes, nose and ears, and headaches, but I'm not sure what degree of fracture it has to be to get what. Well that's actually two questions, but I think we will live. |
| |
| | #974 (permalink) | |
| Ubi amici, ibi opes... Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: Southampton
Posts: 7,890
| Re: Quick Fire Questions (A Place to Ask and Answer) Quote:
It's actually a researched scientific theory, with interesting conclusions: Want Your Enemies to Trust You? Put On Your Baby Face | |
| |
| | #975 (permalink) | |
| lorcutus.tolere Join Date: Feb 2012 Location: New Zealand (Aotorea)
Posts: 722
| Re: Quick Fire Questions (A Place to Ask and Answer) Quote:
A minor linear skull fracture is liable to be of no clinical significance, requiring no treatment. It may not even cause concussion. A headache is likely from any head trauma, although it may be minor. A more significant blow may cause concussion, although you may not lose consciousness. Really serious blows may cause an epidural hematoma, which can be fatal. If the blow damages the venous sinus it may result in CVST stroke, while a blow across one of the joints between the skull's eight cranial bones may result in suture diastasis (separation of the joint). The bleeding from the ears and nose is a symptom of a Basilar skull fracture which is a linear fracture to the base of the skull. These are very rare and dangerous as the base of the skull requires much more force to fracture than other parts of the skull. Symptoms of a basilar skull fracture include bleeding from the ears and nose, "racoon eyes" (caused by pooling of blood in the optical cavity), blood in the sinuses, and leaking of cerebrospinal fluid from the ears or nose (it may drip into the back of the throat resulting in a salty taste). | |
| |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Rate This Thread | |
| |