| |||||||
| Art Discuss art and artistic media with strong science fiction and fantasy themes - comment on artworks themselves, methods, drawing, materials, and artists. |
| View Poll Results: Who will win | |||
| Sci-Fi | | 14 | 31.11% |
| Fantasy | | 31 | 68.89% |
| Voters: 45. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Rate Thread |
| | #18 (permalink) |
| Registered Lunatic Join Date: Aug 2011 Location: Australia, Victoria
Posts: 52
| Re: Sci-Fi vs Fantasy But we're talking about science fiction. Science fiction has just as much imaginative scope as fantasy. If you insist on combining science and science fiction, then it's only fair to couple fantasy with religion. Don't you think? The reason I think this is because fantasy is a closed system. The nature of magic and those who use it are well-established. Or that's the way it appears to me. So, like religion it really cannot move too far from its source, i.e. mythology. Yes, I can accept that this view is pretty limited (and naive), and I hope some readers of fantasy can point me away from elves and dragons and warlocks. Science fiction, which, of course, is based, usually, on science doesn't suffer the same limitation, because it can't help but expand at a similar rate to our understanding of our world and our universe. Science fiction has always been the great asker of the question, What if? Although I have a preference for science fiction, I have enjoyed many a good fantasy novel. From my view, science fiction hasn't quite yet had as good a work of literature as The Lord of the Rings (fantasy). But, again, I may be mistaken - and, anyway, it's so subjective. Just had another thought. Fantasy is, like religion, more popular than science fiction, like science. Fantasy is all kind of warm and secure, whereas, science fiction can tend to be cold and insecure. Fantasy is easily understood because, as I said, it is a closed system based on 'Earthly' concerns. The characters and landscape of fantasy is all too familiar at the best of times, which is not a bad thing, of course, especially when the writing is good. Science fiction is a lot more difficult to understand, mainly because it is such an open system and, usually, based on 'difficult' science. The characters and landscape of science fiction can be as varied as our imaginations (which is not to suggest that fantasy lacks this quality) and it is exciting and frightening because of this. Last edited by Oskari; 27th August 2011 at 06:28 AM. Reason: Extra random thoughts and a bit of editing |
| | |
| | #22 (permalink) |
| Senior Member Join Date: Sep 2011 Location: Moray
Posts: 2,022
| Re: Sci-Fi vs Fantasy I'd like to reference the first post - fantasy because something has given the unicorns gas. It's infiltrated all the spaceships. In fact at the end only unicorns and those with gas masks and no sense of smell survive. |
| | |
| | #25 (permalink) | ||
| Coven of the Worm Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Maryland
Posts: 925
| Re: Sci-Fi vs Fantasy Quote:
The Fall of Hyperion Endymion by Dan Simmons Maybe not. But I loved them as much as I did LotR.![]() I still chose fantasy. EDIT: Quote:
Last edited by Michael01; 6th March 2012 at 01:26 PM. Reason: To avoid a double post, mainly. | ||
| | |
| | #27 (permalink) |
| Registered User | Re: Sci-Fi vs Fantasy Fantasy would win strictly speaking magic is connected to everything, I also think it to be more instantaneous. speak a word and anything can happen where as if you have a gun all that can happen is you shoot something. Love the question though |
| | |
| | #29 (permalink) |
| Senior Member Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Texas
Posts: 371
| Re: Sci-Fi vs Fantasy Fantasy would win, it's open for anything to happen. Sci-fi has a problem of usually having to make sense. And science tends to ignore anything that isn't, well, scientific and understandable. |
| | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Rate This Thread | |
| |