| | #107 (permalink) | |
| Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: Shropshire
Posts: 4,122
| Re: Improving our Challenge Stories -- READ FIRST POST Quote:
) written in the worried/complaining/exaggerating conversational style of C3P0. My challenge style seems to have developed into half-deceiving the reader until the last line of a story then finishing with a slight twist. With this alternate history story I was hoping to surprise the reader with denouement that C3P0 had been turned to the dark side. But, of course, that depends on the reader understanding in the first place that it was C3P0 who was talking... | |
| | |
| | #109 (permalink) |
| Lagomorphing | Re: Improving our Challenge Stories -- READ FIRST POST I got C3PO, but I thought the friend was R2D2! No wonder I couldn't get it to make sense. For me, it might have been clearer if you'd used "sinister" instead of "odd". On the other hand, it might only have been the clue to R2D2 that convinced me it was C3PO in the first place. Tricky ... (Also, "Vader" instead of "Darth" might have been clearer, and prevented possible confusion with characters from the prequels. And isn't "Darth" a kind of title?) |
| | |
| | #112 (permalink) | |
| Dehhh de de deh | Re: Improving our Challenge Stories -- READ FIRST POST I thought it was about C3PO, although wasn't certain. Also, this line... Quote:
The original gave me all sorts of connotations. | |
| | |
| | #115 (permalink) |
| Bearly Believable Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: UK: ENGLAND:
Posts: 12,046
| Re: Improving our Challenge Stories -- READ FIRST POST I hadn't realised that the narrator was C3PO, but now I know, it seems so obvious (what with the "bits of me scattered" comment). To be fair, it's very hard to know how to pitch these things. If one gives every clue but the name, it can seem heavy-handed** (and can lead to the comment, "Why didn't you just say who it was?"); this is would be particularly pointed given the few words one has to tell the whole tale and the reader thinks you've wasted many if not most of them. On the other hand, say too little and no-one but the author knows what it's about. ** - Or suggesting that the readers are ignoramuses (which is not the ideal way to garner votes). |
| | |
| | #117 (permalink) | |
| Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: Shropshire
Posts: 4,122
| Re: Improving our Challenge Stories -- READ FIRST POST Quote:
Still, that's what the challenge is all about - learning from your mistakes and improving your writing. Thanks, everyone, for your comments. | |
| | |
| | #118 (permalink) | |
| Valeyard Join Date: Feb 2011 Location: Iowa
Posts: 614
| Re: Improving our Challenge Stories -- READ FIRST POST Quote:
) | |
| | |
| | #119 (permalink) | |
| Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: Shropshire
Posts: 4,122
| Re: Improving our Challenge Stories -- READ FIRST POST Quote:
Honestly, I tried and even now that you've explained that was based on a cartoon I still don't think I understand it. And even if I did, does it fit one of the fundamental rules of the Challenge - that it should tell a story? | |
| | |
| | #120 (permalink) |
| Keep Moving Forward! | Re: Improving our Challenge Stories -- READ FIRST POST I got the Voltron reference, but I have to side with mosaix on this one - I couldn't really pin down a narrative point. Was there a significance to the foe being a teddy bear? An inside joke forgotten in the years since I last saw a Voltron cartoon? I actually thought it may have been a reference to Ursa - references to the Chrons and its inhabitants being a somewhat recurring theme in these challenges - but still couldn't make sense of it... When you only have seventy-five words to play with, I don't think you can afford to worry if it is improperly formatted for a script. It was close enough that it was fairly unmistakable. The bigger issue for me was the aforementioned story element, and the grammatical errors that you have already noted. It was an interesting way to approach the challenge, but was let down in the execution. |
| | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Rate This Thread | |
| |