| |||||||
| Science / Nature Messageboards for discussing all aspects of science, the environment of our world, and the scientific exploration of it. |
| Welcome to the Science Fiction Fantasy Chronicles forums | |
| Welcome to the chronicles network, the UK's largest - and friendliest - science fiction and fantasy forums!
If you love to read or watch science fiction and fantasy, you've come to the right place to be among like-minded people. And we count published authors, editors, and agents among our members, so have an especially strong community of aspiring writers. To post or reply to a topic you'll need to register - but don't worry, it's free and we don't pass on any of your details to anyone else. | |
 |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Rate Thread |
22nd October 2010, 11:18 PM
| #3 (permalink) | ||
| bringer of cake  | Re: Star Size Comparisons Quote:
And, I have to say, at least one of them does!!! Quote:
HubbleSite - Showcase: Entire Collection | ||
|  |
|
23rd October 2010, 03:24 PM
| #4 (permalink) |
| Speaker to Cats  Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: UK: ENGLAND:
Posts: 1,482
| Re: Star Size Comparisons Those hyper-giants are scary, burning through their fuel in millennia instead of aeons... What's really weird is that low-end brown-dwarf stars (not shown) may be smaller than high-end gas giants-- There's a bobble in the mass/diameter graph... |
|
| |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Rate This Thread | |
| |
) 
