Finished My First Clarke Novel

[weirdside]

I'm slogging my way through all the books that have won both the Hugo and Nebula, and I just finished Rendezvous with Rama. I found it enjoyable, albeit lacking conflict. The science was spot on and not too overblown like it is in most modern hard sf pieces, which was very refreshing. I just thought that the characters and plot lacked a lot of depth. I was never worried that something would go wrong. It did evoke a sense of wonder and adventure, another thing that is sorely missing from modern sf. Are the other Rama books worth reading?

[chrispenycate]

Originally Posted by weirdside

I'm slogging my way through all the books that have won both the Hugo and Nebula, and I just finished Rendezvous with Rama. I found it enjoyable, albeit lacking conflict. The science was spot on and not too overblown like it is in most modern hard sf pieces, which was very refreshing. I just thought that the characters and plot lacked a lot of depth. I was never worried that something would go wrong. It did evoke a sense of wonder and adventure, another thing that is sorely missing from modern sf. Are the other Rama books worth reading?

In my not particularly humble – in fact sometimes totally conceited – opinion, no. I find them excellent examples of sequilitis.

And I haven't liked many of the Clarke collaborations; he seemed to work reasonably well with Baxter, but apart from that…

So, as far as I'm concerned, keep the good memories of the first book by not doing what I did and reading the later volumes.

[Pyar]

I had a very similar reaction! The characters and plot did lack depth for me too, although I think in the time that it was written it was groundbreaking in terms of the science that people probably overlooked that. I always thought about reading the other Rama books after finishing it but they are co-written with Gentry Lee.

Read my post below (its about Rama, I just posted it in a Dune thread):
The Legends of Dune Trilogy by Kevin J. Anderson and Brian Herbert

If you click on the links on those posts you will see why you shouldn't read the sequels.

[Rodders]

The first one for me was superb. But as you say, you can only really do this once. I did read the others but by the time i got to Garden of Rama, i got really, really bored.

[Fried Egg]

I've just started my first Clarke novel: "A Fall of Moondust". Good so far...

[AE35Unit]

I'd say the first sequel at least is worth a read,some great scenes in there and I love the Octospiders!

[Connavar]

I do wonder if A Fall of Moondust is seen as better ACC than Songs of Distant Earth.

They are the two Clarke books i have and wonder about which to make it my first story or novel of his.

[AE35Unit]

Originally Posted by Fried Egg

I've just started my first Clarke novel: "A Fall of Moondust". Good so far...

Great place to start,even if some of The science has been overtaken.

[AE35Unit]

Originally Posted by Connavar

I do wonder if A Fall of Moondust is seen as better ACC than Songs of Distant Earth.

They are the two Clarke books i have and wonder about which to make it my first story or novel of his.

Well Fall of Moondust is pure SF action adventure,whereas Songs of Distant Earth is more like science fantasy,almost like Anne McCaffrey.

[Connavar]

Science fantasy is not what you are after when you want to try reading ACC

That makes my choice very simple. Really the only reason i havent read A Fall of Mondust is cause its a tiny,really old paperback.

[AE35Unit]

Originally Posted by Connavar

. Really the only reason i havent read A Fall of Mondust is cause its a tiny,really old paperback.

It is,but its a great little story. Also try Earthlight,another early novel set on the moon which has a great battle scene,made compelling because of The fact that there's no sound in space.

[Fried Egg]

My choice of the first ACC novel to read was between "A Fall of Moondust" and "The City and the Stars". Both are in the SF Mastworks series so they should both be good. I went for the former merely because the premise grabbed me more.

[AE35Unit]

City and the Stars is a great story too but its much grander,on a bigger scale with bigger ideas. Moondust is a much simpler,more contained story.

[Abyssimal]

City and the Stars was such a radical departure from what we are used to seeing from Clarke. I always had the feeling he had a "Oh, what the hell." moment when he wrote it because it was pure fantasy and he wasn't as belaboured trying to tie in scientific fact.

I thought it was a really fun read.

[AE35Unit]

Originally Posted by Abyssimal

City and the Stars was such a radical departure from what we are used to seeing from Clarke. I always had the feeling he had a "Oh, what the hell." moment when he wrote it because it was pure fantasy and he wasn't as belaboured trying to tie in scientific fact.

I thought it was a really fun read.

Oh i wouldn't say it was fantasy,its pure hard SF! Songs of Distant Earth is the closest he got to fantasy