| | #17 (permalink) | |
| Mod of Awesome Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Oregon
Posts: 3,724
| Re: Terminator Salvation set for May 2009 release Quote:
McG is so cool. And, I liked Charlies Angels. And, while its obviously not original, did anyone watch the original Terminator for the first time and not go, dude, I wish they would make a movie about the robot apocalypse? Because I've been waiting for that since I was like, a kid. | |
| | |
| | #19 (permalink) |
| |-O-| (-O-) |-O-| Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: Essex
Posts: 2,478
| Re: Terminator Salvation set for May 2009 release I'm looking forward to this. The set pieces look good. Let'e be honest, this story has been waiting to be told since the original Terminator. At least they're not trying to invent one out of thin air. Love it or hate it, this is going to be an interesting film. |
| | |
| | #20 (permalink) |
| Senior Member Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Sweden
Posts: 7,996
| Re: Terminator Salvation set for May 2009 release Bale is awesome and he brings intense quality to all his movies. I saw the trailer and Bale as John Connor looked too good. One of few actors in hollywood who can pull of the role perfectly. Im waiting for it alot more than i cared about it before the trailer. |
| | |
| | #22 (permalink) |
| Wherever I Am, I'm There | Terminator Salvation (2009) [Spoilers] I've seen the film, so this thread has spoilers. First off, I liked it. I liked it more than I expected though 'Star Trek' is better IMHO. The theme is of a Terminator with a heart. Not just an 'emotional heart' like Arnie in 'Terminator 2', but this time Marcus Wright also has a real human heart. He is a death row convict who donated his body to Cyberdyne Systems in return for a kiss. Skynet has now begun to build the first T-800 Terminators with flesh and blood. He is one-off prototype who really believes he is human, which is a puzzle to John Connor who has only seen the enemy before as machines (he must have forgotten all of his teenage years when he had Summer Glau as a minder!) The idea is that Marcus can infiltrate the Resistance and it works until his human side shows through. I've just read 'Frankenstein' and their are many parallels - the created man who is a multiple murder but intensely regrets his actions and merely wants to be human and to find his creator. The film was also derivative in a number of other ways - the Resistance Command is a submarine with more than a passing resemblance to 'The Nebecanezzar' and the Machine Army from 'The Matrix' is not unlike the Terminators, espcially the gunships and snake-like things. And there are a startling number of different new Terminator types of almost Pokemon proportions, or were they 'Transformers'? Then there was the mute child who saved the day more than once - Newt from 'Aliens' anyone? I did like the film until shortly before the end when all the 'heart' stuff just got overplayed. Marcus has a real heart, just more powerful. This makes him vulnerable to attack by a Terminator who stops it with a punch to his chest. Connor uses the mains electricity to re-start his heart, but is then mortally wounded himself. So, Marcus, the 'man with a heart' donates his own heart to Connor. This takes place in a field hospital in the middle of a battle, without tissue-typing, and a damaged heart, performed by a Veterinarian. The other theme is the protection of Kyle Reese. You would expect that by 2018 if John Connor still lived, then he was safe at last, but of course if Kyle dies he cannot save Sarah Connor and father the unborn John. The Skynet hit list now has Kyle at number one and Connor at number two. The Time Travel paradoxes will continue so the best thing John can do in the next film will be to send Kyle back as soon as possible. No sign of Kyle's brother, Derek, which makes you wonder if the writers of this film ever watch 'The Sarah Connor Chronicles' TV series. I also found the need to insert the lines "Come with me", "Come with me if you want to live", and "I'll be back" at various places rather irritating. Last edited by Dave; 7th June 2009 at 08:03 PM. |
| | |
| | #23 (permalink) | |
| Wherever I Am, I'm There | re: T4: Terminator Salvation (2009) I found this on wikipedia which partly explains the weak ending: Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #24 (permalink) |
| Registered User Join Date: May 2009 Location: California
Posts: 14
| re: T4: Terminator Salvation (2009) After Terminator 3, this was a welcome return to taking the Terminator universe seriously. Sure, it was mostly cliches, but there were nice moments. Sam Worthington was given quite a few challenges to overcome in the script. He's the cliche reluctant hero, the mold we've seen virtually every actor in Hollywood try to tackle. Most of them are cliche—bad derivatives of previous reluctant heroes—but a few manage to have nice moments. The Marcus character is meant to be a plot device, something to get us to question what constitutes free will and all that jazz, but he ends up being the main character. Which is interesting. Moreover, Marcus really gets us thinking about Skynet. The short discussion between Marcus and Skynet seemed to communicate more about Skynet than the previous 3 films combined. Skynet, from an intellectual standpoint, is brilliant. It can carry out complex military strategies across the planet. From a developmental standpoint, it seems almost petty. It mocks Marcus several times, gloating prematurely about it's victory via subterfuge. I left wondering if Skynet isn't acting in self defense but is rather tantruming by exterminating humanity. Perhaps it wanted a cookie. Bale may not have been the most brilliant choice for Connor (he has apparently become unable to stop speaking in his Batman voice), but he had a few moments with Common and Bryce Dallas Howard that seem very authentic. Considering the movie is mostly about Marcus but is supposed to lead into a strong Connor sequel it somehow managed to work well. My hope is that the sequel will really get into the meat and potatoes of what it is to be a futuristic war/apocolypse drama. While I'd like them to start tying up the incredibly complex time travel plot they've been developing, I think it might be too late. Let's just go nuts, and someone give Christian Bale a losange. 7/10 |
| | |
| | #25 (permalink) | |
| Senior Member Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Sweden
Posts: 7,996
| re: T4: Terminator Salvation (2009) Quote:
Christian Bale is much stronger lead actor than Sam Worthington. He would never carry a series like this. | |
| | |
| | #26 (permalink) |
| Wherever I Am, I'm There | re: T4: Terminator Salvation (2009) If I read that correctly, the intention was to have Marcus become John though, and for John Connor to actually be a Terminator himself would have been an interesting twist in the tale. Bale is a better actor but I have to agree with Will83 about the 'Batman' voice. |
| | |
| | #27 (permalink) |
| Sunset colored eyes Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: California
Posts: 923
| re: T4: Terminator Salvation (2009) I found the movie like-able. I still don't think they've made a Terminator that can match the first movie. There was something that caught my attention. In Salvation Kyle warned Marcus not to go out at night, because the machines use infrared. In the first Terminator, Kyle told Sarah that in the future, people stayed down by day, and moved around more at night despite the machines using infrared. It seems the people who survived Salvation are in for advanced training now that Connor has the helm. Oh, and just one more crit. I hope-to-God, in the next movie, someone can refer to Kyle without using his full name. Even once would make the movie less annoying. I understand why they did it, and I even liked the kid they chose to be him. But there are more discrete ways to achieve his identity than having him advertise his full name to everyone who asks. I noticed it right away, everytime. He referred to himself by full name. Every time someone inquired. I never do that unless it's expected, and for some reason, in that future, I would imagine last names have less meaning than they do now - unless of course you're skynet, and you're looking for specific people. But Kyle didn't know he was on a special hit list. |
| | |
| | #28 (permalink) |
| Senior Member Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Sweden
Posts: 7,996
| re: T4: Terminator Salvation (2009) I saw it last night, i thought action wise it was very good but the story lacked. John Conner didnt get many calm scenes that did anything for the story. Marcus story started well but ended up very clichè. With take my heart thing that they overplayed in the end,Skynet AI being stupid enough to let Marcus do everything he did with their computers in the stronghold. The writing must be much better next film otherwise there is no point. You need to write near as well as T2. Make it more thrilling the story like T2 and not just focus on the action imo. Bale acting saved the John Conner side of the story for me. He using the voice,everything is the writers,directors lack of good writing. |
| | |
| | #29 (permalink) |
| |-O-| (-O-) |-O-| Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: Essex
Posts: 2,478
| re: T4: Terminator Salvation (2009) I haven't yet seen this so i may be wrong, but i personally felt that Bale is miscast as John Connor. I think the studios are riding the coattails of Batman. Shame Edward Furlong can't get his act together. He would have been good. |
| | |
| | #30 (permalink) |
| Registered User Join Date: May 2009 Location: California
Posts: 14
| re: T4: Terminator Salvation (2009) I agree that he was miscast, but he's still a very skilled action actor. We don't get many of those, so we have to be liberal with what we've got. Personally, I think Sam Worthington would have made a better Conner, but he did well enough as Marcus. And I'm digging the Star Wars reference in your user title! |
| | |