Science Fiction Fantasy  
Go Back   Science Fiction Fantasy Chronicles: forums > Books and Writing > Authors > Frank Herbert

Frank Herbert Discussion board for the writings of Frank Herbet, not least The Dune Series.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread
Old 31st May 2009, 08:49 PM   #1 (permalink)
|-O-| (-O-) |-O-|
 
Rodders's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Essex
Posts: 2,702
Dune: Book Vs film Vs TV

I was reading the Blade runner part of the PKD section and saw this comment: "Hmmm thats funny J-sun because I like the movie of Dune and hope to get it on DVD,but i found the book almost unreadable and boring!"

I really enjoyed the book, the movie and the TV series of Dune and Children of Dune. Just wondered how others compared the three formats.
Rodders is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st June 2009, 12:17 AM   #2 (permalink)
Prehistoric Irish Cynic
 
clovis-man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: California
Posts: 1,874
Re: Dune: Book Vs film Vs TV

There are many critics of Dune, the book. Too involved, too much 60s drug-culture influence, too much mysticism, etc. Pick your gripe. I believe it to be a seminal work, never to be duplicated or surpassed. So there.

The David Lynch movie was a waste of time and money. too much David Lynch (can you say Eraserhead?) and not enough Frank Herbert.

The Sci-Fi Channel mini-series at least had the virtue of following the story for the most part. But like many "literal" interpretations, it lacked spirit, IMHO.

One example to illustrate my point: Early in the book, Stilgar breaks into a meeting of Atreides operatives. At one point he spits on the floor. The assembled nobles and soldiers are taken aback until it is explained to them that his "offering of water" is a high compliment, not an offense. Portraying that moment on film just looks silly. In Herbert's prose, it represents real drama. Impossible to recreate on celluloid.

My 2 cents.
clovis-man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st June 2009, 01:11 AM   #3 (permalink)
|-O-| (-O-) |-O-|
 
Rodders's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Essex
Posts: 2,702
Re: Dune: Book Vs film Vs TV

You're 2 cents are more than welcome Clovis-Man.

I'm afraid it was the David Lynch Film that got me in to Dune in the first place and i thought that it was very well done considering the time frame. This film to me represents a classic. I thought it had great visuals for the time and considering the difficulty of it's source was a truly under appreciated movie. I Loved it.
Rodders is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st June 2009, 03:14 AM   #4 (permalink)
Lemming of Discord
 
Werthead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 1,838
Re: Dune: Book Vs film Vs TV

In terms of adaption the film has the definitive cast and production design. A bit weird, but it caught the atmosphere of the book quite well to my mind.

OTOH, the TV series had a longer running time and was able to be more faithful to the book and fit more moments from the book in. But it looked pretty ridiculous on occasion (such as the complete absence of any scenes filmed in the desert and the use of painted backdrops instead).

And with our current remake-crazy culture, apparently there's yet another movie version of Dune in the works.
Werthead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st June 2009, 03:59 AM   #5 (permalink)
Prehistoric Irish Cynic
 
clovis-man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: California
Posts: 1,874
Re: Dune: Book Vs film Vs TV

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rodders View Post
This film to me represents a classic.
We'll probably just have to agree to disagree on this. I could produce a long list of complaints, but it would serve no purpose. Let's just say, that, for me it went from the sublime to the ridiculous, e.g., Sting as Feyd Rautha was superb, very much in character. OTOH, Kenneth McMillan as Baron Harkonnen was more like Elmer Fudd with a complexion problem, pathetic, not menacing. I always thought someone like John Rhys-Davies or William Conrad (big guy, big voice) would have been better.

Suffice to say that there are many who are huge fans of David Lynch (including my older son) and think everything from Twin Peaks to Blue Velvet was shear genius. I know better than to protest too much.

Actually, the idea of a "new" Dune doesn't send me screaming for the exit. Maybe it's time for another re-do, although Peter Berg isn't quite a household name as far as directors go.
clovis-man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st June 2009, 05:03 AM   #6 (permalink)
Moderator
 
j. d. worthington's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 13,572
Re: Dune: Book Vs film Vs TV

I suppose I'm closer to C.-M. here than others, but not entirely with him. There are a great number of things I quite like about the Lynch film, but I feel that the further along it went, the further it not only deviated from the novel, but became chaotic and nonsensical. I'd also agree about the casting overall.

On the other hand, I think the scene with Stilgar could be done on film quite well, and convey the reactions and reactions to the reactions... if done properly. But you'd have to have a much better director for such nuance and, despite some marvelous things about these productions, they simply don't capture the feel of the thing at all; too flat, I'm afraid -- too removed.

Personally, I'm against a remake of Dune, at least for the time being. There are so many really good, quite cinematic sff books out there which could be adapted into some intelligent genre films, that I'd rather this one had a rest for a while. I also don't want to see another take on The Lathe of Heaven, though I thought the original production was quite good in many ways (the remake, frankly, stank on ice). Heck, there are various of Herbert's own novels and stories which could make some good films... I'd like to see a well-done take on Hellstrom's Hive, for instance; that could make a suspense-horror film which is both intelligent, cautionary, timely, and gripping (and what a wonderful DVD package that would make: Hellstrom's Hive packaged with The Hellstrom Chronicle... purportedly a documentary made by the novel's titular character and his film company....)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Hellstrom_Chronicle
j. d. worthington is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st June 2009, 05:07 AM   #7 (permalink)
|-O-| (-O-) |-O-|
 
Rodders's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Essex
Posts: 2,702
Re: Dune: Book Vs film Vs TV

I wonder why the Sci-Fi channel stopped making these after Children of Dune?
Rodders is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st June 2009, 06:50 AM   #8 (permalink)
Prehistoric Irish Cynic
 
clovis-man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: California
Posts: 1,874
Re: Dune: Book Vs film Vs TV

Quote:
Originally Posted by j. d. worthington View Post
Heck, there are various of Herbert's own novels and stories which could make some good films...
I'd love to see a film of The Dragon in the Sea.
clovis-man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st June 2009, 08:57 AM   #9 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
iansales's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: South Yorkshire
Posts: 3,442
Re: Dune: Book Vs film Vs TV

As an adaptation of the book, Lynch's film is a bit of a failure - he mangled parts of the plot, the rain at the end was silly, and the casting was bonkers for some parts (Sting as Feyd-Rautha?). But. The production design beautifully captured the feel of Herbert's novel - so much so that it's hard to read the book now without imagining it looking like Lynch's film. And yet, it could have been so good. If you watch the "television" version, you can get a better idea of what Lynch was trying to achieve, and if he had been allowed to do that, the result would have been a much more interesting film.

The Sci-Fi (sorry, SyFy) Channel adaption, OTOH, was just dull. Their Children of Dune was a great deal of better.

Having said all that, it's a shame Jodorowsky never got to make his film of Dune. That would have been something to see...
iansales is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd February 2010, 03:01 AM   #10 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Rothgar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 390
Re: Dune: Book Vs film Vs TV

An interesting find on i09. New Evidence That Frank Herbert Loved David Lynch's Version of Dune - Dune - io9A 9 minute video of David Lynch and Frank Herbert talking about the filming of Dune.
Rothgar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th July 2010, 08:27 PM   #11 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: New York
Posts: 52
Re: Dune: Book Vs film Vs TV

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rodders View Post
I was reading the Blade runner part of the PKD section and saw this comment: "Hmmm thats funny J-sun because I like the movie of Dune and hope to get it on DVD,but i found the book almost unreadable and boring!"

I really enjoyed the book, the movie and the TV series of Dune and Children of Dune. Just wondered how others compared the three formats.
The book is an all time classic, the movie strayed too far from the story, and the television series was sort of between the two, capturing enough of the plot essence to make it good, but lacking needed characteristics to make it a top shelf SF offering. I agree with iansales that Children was quite a bit better.
Rand is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th July 2010, 09:31 AM   #12 (permalink)
Expensive Gadget User
 
biodroid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: South Africa
Posts: 2,166
Re: Dune: Book Vs film Vs TV

I liked the 80's version, then I watched the mini-series which was also good, I really enjoyed the book, I read it years after the movies. The mini-series was closer to the book than the first 1 but they were both good in their own right.
biodroid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27th July 2010, 07:53 AM   #13 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Philippines
Posts: 2
Re: Dune: Book Vs film Vs TV

For me, Dune is one of the greatest literary works of the 20th century, probably should be among the all-time classics. Definitely one of the best science fiction novels, if not the best.

I liked Feyd Rautha in the movie. That's about it.

The TV series did try it's darn best. But, alas, only a true visionary director could probably match the vision of Frank Herbert.... calling Peter Jackson? Chris Nolan?
quick_ben is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th August 2010, 03:49 PM   #14 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 56
Re: Dune: Book Vs film Vs TV

So been hearing more recently about the new adaptation...anyone have any news? Would love to read something concrete.

In my opinion the book was a master piece but the only reason i discovered it was firstly through the film, which i also loved. The tV not so much but still enjoyed it. Ultimately the book will be the story i remember - a superb novel.
Gamblor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26th September 2010, 10:16 PM   #15 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Krystal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: USA:
Posts: 2,304
Post Re: Dune: Book Vs film Vs TV

Definitely the books will always be best since its the original awesome concept and no film could ever get all of that. But I have enjoy the tv films that Scifi did. But I suppose only the book will have all that description and story that makes it so great.
Krystal is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:11 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2 ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.