Quote:
|
Originally Posted by I, Brian It would be nice to see the law address the wider issue of what consitutes a union recognised by the state, rather than distract into high-profile minority cases, that leaves the wider questions unanswered. |
I agree, Brian. We're stuck on the definition of marriage when it's really about equality. If two people are willing to make a lifetime commitment they should be able to have a legal union. Does it really have to be defined as marriage? Not all heterosexual couples want to get married either.
Where were these religious marriage law critics when people were able to get married and divorced in a weekend at Las Vegas? Honestly, which is worse... Two people of the same sex in a committed relationship or movie star relationships that last two days. It drives me crazy when I think of which one is considered marriage and which is outrage. Don't we have our morals a little backwards?