| | #1 (permalink) | |
| Bearly Believable Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: UK: ENGLAND:
Posts: 12,057
| Pet Owners Face Code of Practice Quote:
BBC NEWS | Politics | Pet owners face code of practiceOn the one hand, this seems silly; but on the other, it's sad that there are owners who really do need to be told how to treat their pets well. (Oh, and I'm guessing that these owners will be the last to read the leaflet.) | |
| | |
| | #2 (permalink) | ||
| Direwolf of the chrons | Re: Pet Owners Face Code of Practice Quote:
![]() Quote:
Honestly the info in these guidlines appear to be basic, and it is sad that people have to be told such basic info as this, but so many are blind. I think also there is very much an atmosphere growing in the youth (thanks Hollywood) and also the not so young, that animals are an accessory product - which has bad viewpoints when care comes into the equation | ||
| | |
| | #3 (permalink) |
| resident pedantissimo | Re: Pet Owners Face Code of Practice Does telling people simplistic things about pets suggest there should be animal husbandry classes in junior schools? Perhaps the percentage of pet owners isn't high enough. And we're only talking about cats and dogs here; can one assume that anyone who goes for a more exotic companion (a snake, say or a spider) will automatically study its requirements before buying? |
| | |
| | #6 (permalink) |
| Direwolf of the chrons | Re: Pet Owners Face Code of Practice considering the popularity of lizards (especially with those in more urban environements) I would very much think that schools should teach more. Infact I think schools as a whole should teach far more about the "natural world" than is taught curretly (which is mostly a bit on plant life in biology). Its a vast area that is under taught - I mean just how many kids can tell one tree from another? sorry going off at a bit of a tangent |
| | |
| | #13 (permalink) |
| White Wolf Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: Greater Manchester
Posts: 2,011
| Re: Pet Owners Face Code of Practice I really would like stronger animal welfare laws, not more goverment namby pambying and interference, which they call 'advise'. ![]() If you do a job then it should be done properly, bring in stronger laws for pets and above all make sure they are enforced! I have seen countless cruelty cases and many people should not have animals, but even in cases I have reported nothing has been done. For example there is a horrendous pet shop down the road from me, the conditions these animals are kept in physically sickens me, in some instances there are rabbits in cases so small they can barely move in a circle, I have reported this to RSPCA and the animal welfare deptartment of the local council, but nothing has changed. I think cruelty to animals can come in many more forms than just physical. For instance the amount of dogs I know that never leave the house or in a neighbours case take them out on the front lawn on lead to do toilet twice a day and it stays in their tiny 1st floor flat, thats that dogs entire existence... To me that is also cruelty, if you get an animal then you are obliged to make the animals life as fuffilling as possible and that encludes exercise and stimulation, especially for a dog its so important. If you cant be bothered to exercise your dog then you shouldnt have one, simple as. Sorry about the rant, I couldve gone on much longer as I feel so strongly about this, but for everyones sake I will shut up. |
| | |
| | #14 (permalink) | |
| Noise Warrior Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Isle of Wight
Posts: 789
| Re: Pet Owners Face Code of Practice Quote:
I knew I wouldn't walk it regularly and it would be left alone from 8am till 6pm while we're at work/school/child minders. I admit that 90% of my reasons are selfish because I can't be bothered to spend my time caring for a dog, but at least I know it and won't take on the responsibility and make an animal's life miserable. | |
| | |
![]() |
| Tags |
| cat, dog, entertainment, pet owners, play |
| Thread Tools | |
| Rate This Thread | |
| |