| | #1 (permalink) |
| Registered User Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: California
Posts: 52
| Legend of the Seeker Aa upcoming TV series based on...wait for it...Terry Goodkind's Wizard's First Rule! In the US, it will be airing on WGN starting November 1st. I know he doesn't get a lot positive words when he's mentioned around here, but it'll be nice to see some fantasy stuff on TV even though Goodkind says he doesn't write fantasy; it is what it is. I enjoyed his first three Sword of Truth novels, so I'll be checking it out. |
| | |
| | #3 (permalink) |
| smiling politely Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Australia, Victoria
Posts: 588
| Re: Legend of the Seeker Not a fan of goodkind, but I will so be watching the series. At best it will be a good fantasy romp. At worst, it will be something hilarious that we can all pick on on the boards! Win-win in my eyes! |
| | |
| | #5 (permalink) |
| Registered User Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 390
| Re: Legend of the Seeker Well I guess I missed the premiere. For whatever reason it was on at 5pm Saturday my time. That's as strange of a timeslot for a new show as I've ever seen. Did anyone else manage to see it? |
| | |
| | #6 (permalink) |
| Registered User Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 390
| Re: Legend of the Seeker It looks like the critics pretty much panned the series. You can look at a compilation of the critic reviews here. How Do Critics Find Raimi’s LEGEND OF THE SEEKER?? -- Ain't It Cool News: The best in movie, TV, DVD, and comic book news. Infact I have yet to see a positive review for the series. |
| | |
| | #7 (permalink) |
| 2013, time to write Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: Canada
Posts: 873
| Re: Legend of the Seeker I watched it and yes it was on at 3:00pm and then again at 7:00pm (which is when I watched it)...It was very dissapointing. Richard is a whiny little man. A horrible casting...Zedd was good but that was about it. Kahlan and Richard had no chemistry and Darken Rahl looks like a Alan Rickman rip off. The Dharan commander was awful and couldnt act his way out of a paper bag. Bad special effects ( the gars ) made things even worse. The sad thing is I will probably continue to watch it just because there are never any classic fantasy shows on tv. That doesnt mean I wont be dissapointed every week. I sure expected more from the Raimi/Tapert combo. |
| | |
| | #8 (permalink) |
| S.M.R.T. Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 883
| Re: Legend of the Seeker Meh, I didn't think it was that bad. The gars were some really low brow CGI though. There was some quality production value that I didn't expect (not on the gars, lol). The dialogue was fairly middling, but not terrible. Some of the timing was horribly off though. When the one soldier tells Richard they should wait 'till daybreak to go after the Dharan, and Richard replies that was only three hours away, and then they go to the soldiers house and everyone in the soldier's family is awake serving dinner (at what must have been 4am), didn't make sense. And when Khalan (I think) said it was an hour to the barrier, and they left in full sunlight, and arrived in complete dark. It had it's bad moments, and fun moments. The fight scenes were actually quite well done. I will qualify this by saying I was very hungover from Halloween and my fiance took the main tv, and I was nursing my wounds in the back room when I watched it. C+ |
| | |
| | #9 (permalink) |
| smiling politely Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Australia, Victoria
Posts: 588
| Re: Legend of the Seeker … could not have been more dull if the creators had tried. The acting is amateurish. The action is sluggish. The story moves slower than a snail on a glacier. And it is just so bad there is really nothing funny about it. … OUCH! |
| | |
| | #10 (permalink) |
| 2013, time to write Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: Canada
Posts: 873
| Re: Legend of the Seeker I like to think that it will get better as Richard already seems to be doing "the dance of death" with the sword of truth...maybe that means he will stop being such a 12 year old. Also now that they have passed the barrier and set the characters up so they can focus on some story. One more rant...didnt Richard read the Book of Counted Shadows as a child and memorize it then burn it. I also remember George Chyper bringing Richard into the Westlands not Zedd..am I crazy? |
| | |
| | #11 (permalink) |
| Immortalis Canis Lupus Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: USA:
Posts: 368
| Re: Legend of the Seeker Wow...it was horrible. I had a hard time finishing the episode. They changed so much it wasn't even funny. Richard is some kind of annoying man-boy. Kahlan is hot, but doesn't seem all that great. Plus no green eyes! Have they ever heard of eye contacts? They even screwed up the whole part about the book of counted shadows. Zedd and Richard are suppose to be friends, but he just calls him a crazy old man like he wants nothing to do with him ever. I also like the part where Richard kills 50 people and is fine with it... Darken Rahl, where the hell is his blond hair? Since when does he move palace to palace? He stays in D'hara. Fain is suppose to be a huge guy that molests children. Not some regular brown haired guy that Richard kills in the first two episodes. Kahlan is suppose to kill him in the most interesting way (not that they would show that of course). I guess people who haven't read the books or can turn their "goodkind radar" off enjoy the show. But I'm not sure I'll be able to do that. It does make me want to re-read the books since it was a year ago. Even with all the books issues, I'd still rather read them then watch the show. |
| | |
| | #12 (permalink) |
| 2013, time to write Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: Canada
Posts: 873
| Re: Legend of the Seeker Yeah, Fain was awful...and werent all the soldiers after Kahlan supposed to be huge blond guys? they were pitiful...I hated the whole book of counted shadows part. I think they said he moves from palace to palace so they can stretch out the episodes...is he is Dhara at the peoples palace...no, not this week. i dont remember there being many palaces in Dhara...do you? |
| | |
| | #13 (permalink) |
| Immortalis Canis Lupus Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: USA:
Posts: 368
| Re: Legend of the Seeker They'll probably have him move from D'hara to the Midlands and so on. Who knows what they will do. It's impossible to predict this crap. And there is suppose to be 20 something episodes also. I wonder if it will get canceled before it's finished. I doubt there will be a second season. SFF shows don't usually last long, except for some exceptions, but at least no Goodkind fans will support it. |
| | |
| | #14 (permalink) |
| FemmeFatale Dragon of NFF Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Bristol
Posts: 70
| Re: Legend of the Seeker I think im happy that Im not watching the series!!! I know on the Goodkind forum they have said it doesnt exactly follow the book but from what you guys are saying it sounds like they chucked the book in the shredder and picked over the bits n the bin! |
| | |
| | #15 (permalink) |
| Registered User Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: UK: ENGLAND:
Posts: 1
| Re: Legend of the Seeker Hey all. Well, what can really be said? I am a big fan of the books, and strongly believe that "certain" parts (if related into film/TV should be kept. EG: "The book of counted shadows" (for anyone who has read the books/all of them) is an integral part in the ENTIRE series. And how it is found, the story behind it, is not accurate at all. Richards Mother: Wasnt she related to a "Certain" key character? Hence why that "Character" moved to Westland!!! According to the TV series, she isnt Richards "Real Mother....." Which in turn means that "Certain" key character isnt Richards grandfather (oh darn, gave it away...) I dont remember Chase's daughter being kidnapped. In fact, if the TV series creators had kept to the original plot, it would have made more sense. Dont get me wrong, I did enjoy the first 2 episodes, and will continue to watch, but at the moment far too much has been changed/left out to have any relevance to the original books...! I can agree that TG would not have allowed the series to air, if he thought "Hello, what the hell is that" but surely, keeping the "main" aspect that continues through the book series is "key" for allowing the plot to unfold naturally! Another negative (and speculation): Richard doesnt find out about Khalan for ages, yet in the TV series he finds out very early (thats an integral part of the story) the "Book" is never stolen by "D'Haran troops" and Zedd doesnt cross the Boundry with Richard and Khalan...! Correct me if I am wrong: But aren't those apects of the book(s) "KEY" to the entire series? AndyM |
| | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Rate This Thread | |
| |