| |||||||||
| General Book Discussion General Science Fiction Fantasy books and literature discussion. |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Rate Thread |
| | #2 (permalink) |
| Total Harmonic Detonator Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 336
| Re: No Koontz? I like Koontz before he wrote Fear Nothing and then all his books after that just went downhill from there. I must say some of the scariest and most intriguing novels I read were by him like Lightning, Phantoms and Watchers. I just lost interest in him because he became very formulaic, guy hooks up with girl they run for their lives from unspeakable evil then through some chance win blah blah. I guess maybe he isn't as good a writer as say Stephen King who can really twist things up and make you feel like you are being taken on a ride with him. |
| | |
| | #5 (permalink) |
| Living in Paradise | Re: No Koontz? I agree with biorod , I liked some of his earlier stuff with Lightening being a favorite and later he wrote The Taking but in between the two there was some pretty weird stuff. He had the potential to be a brilliant writer but I think he fell of the track some where . I really lost interest in picking up any of his new stuff. |
| | |
| | #6 (permalink) | |
| Moderator Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 9,468
| Re: No Koontz? Quote:
So start some threads, get some discussions going, and see what happens. If enough people are interested in talking about Koontz and his work, then... who knows? | |
| | |
| | #8 (permalink) |
| kespires.blogspot.com Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 242
| Re: No Koontz? Well, most of his stuff except for Lightning and a few others are fantasy if you get technical. I remember one book, Dragon Eye or something like it, where the villain can stop time and manipulate other things that there is no scientific explanation for. In From the Corner of His Eye the protagonist, Bartholomew, can go into and out of other dimensions with no explanation. The second protagonist can "paint holes" that people or things fall into to vanish without a trace. In By the Light of the Moon the protagonists develop super powers and form a super hero group under the guidance of a radio host that airs stories of a Tales from the Crypt style. All the Odd books are fantasies. Guy sees dead people. Guy sees squiggly black things that gather round people before terrible things happen to them. Most are Dark Fantasy; but in his book about writing he notes that he's written things in all the genres because during a certain point in his career the guy was using something like 9 or 10 pseudonyms. He's published 80 novels. |
| | |
| | #9 (permalink) |
| Total Harmonic Detonator Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 336
| Re: No Koontz? I wouldn't say fantasy, I would more likely call it supernatural than fantasy. Fantasy in respect is like LOTR, Harry Potter. Lightning is more of a Sci Fi thriller when important plot lines get revealed. The one that sounds fantasy-ish to me is By The Light Of The Moon. Just because it sounds unbelievable doesn't mean it's fantasy. Stephen King wrote a book about an old man who can see on different planes of existence (Insomnia) although it seemed to have elements of the fantastical but it was no where near fantasy. It was a supernatural horror/thriller. I think Koontz wrote shorts about fantasy but his mainstream stuff is more horror thriller type stories. Has he really written with 9 pseudonyms? I only heard of Leigh Nichols and that was an interview he did a long while back. Just seems wierd because I have read everything by Koontz except his new stuff. Please don't take this wrong I am not trying to diss you it's just hard to think Koontz writing fantasy. |
| | |
| | #10 (permalink) |
| Moderator Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 9,468
| Re: No Koontz? biodroid: I'm afraid I have to disagree there. This is much too narrow a definition of fantasy, as has been brought out in various discussions on the boards; it's a quite recently evolved one, as well, and would leave out the vast majority of what are considered to be some of the most important works in the field, including a fair chunk of Dunsany, Morris, Lindsay, etc. Now, I've not read much of Koontz' work, but from the descriptions I've come across, it does seem he's written fantasy -- just not the heroic or epic fantasy that (sadly) far too many people see as the only types of story fitting that label.... |
| | |
| | #11 (permalink) |
| Dreams of Midnight Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 866
| Re: No Koontz? DK is one of the most successful authors in the world. He's so prolific that I often wonder if he's cloned himself. His work ethic is phenomenal and every now and then he comes out with a gem. I wish I could work a quarter as hard or successfully as he does. On the fantasy issue I maintain that supernatural horror is fantasy. A vampire is no different to a Balrog or fairy (faerie, or faery). |
| | |
| | #12 (permalink) |
| kespires.blogspot.com Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 242
| Re: No Koontz? Exactly, if we narrow fantasy to LOTR derivatives then we'd lose out on things like The Stand and Castle in the Sky. Lots of things have fantasy elements and get grouped with horror or mainstream, but to me if it relies on things that cannot be explained for plot then it is fantasy. To be honest, and this is just me, but most SF might as well be fantasy because much of the science is pure conjecture. Maybe we'll do FTL one day, but who knows. But that's just me. But definitely, Koontz has on many occasions written fantasy. Dark Fantasy, horror sometimes, but fantasy. I like it. |
| | |
| | #13 (permalink) |
| Registered User Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 4,281
| Re: No Koontz? I find supernatural horror or supernatural thriller to be quite lame names. Just call it fantasy or urban fantasy or dark fantasy. I have read Odd Thomas and are on my second book The Husband now. I think he is talanted specially for a such bestselling writer, lets face it most of them arent that talented :P Since i like him so far i wish there were more talk about his work instead of wondering about where his subforum is. |
| | |
| | #14 (permalink) |
| kespires.blogspot.com Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 242
| Re: No Koontz? Well as far as the subforum, I only mentioned it because it shocked me he didn't have one with as massive of an author as he is. I do think he's better than most at what he does. Koontz and King stand out in the dark fantasy genre as very precise in delivering their scary visions to their readers. King is much more horrific than Koontz while Koontz prefers to write almost heroic fiction masquerading as horror sometimes. I haven't read The Husband, but I have read the first three of the Odd books. I have to say that the second was way too straightforward to me. It was an extremely linear point A to point B so that he can write book C situation. Brother Odd was really good though, "He is the Never Was and I don't care." Best line ever. |
| | |
| | #15 (permalink) |
| Total Harmonic Detonator Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 336
| Re: No Koontz? So where does horror fall into then? Consider one of his most famous books called Watchers, although it is classed as a horror it has "fantastical" creatures but they were human engineered (the smart dog and the super mutated baboon). Although the technology does not exist today I am sure in the future it can exist and one can make the ultimate killing machine like the super baboon. I don't think thats fantasy or dark fantasy etc. Please don't get me wrong I am not trying cause trouble/grief here I was just under the impression that horror is horror and fantasy is fantasy unless all the libraries I have been to are wrong in categorizing their books. LOTR is fantasy to me full stop and Pet Sematary is horror. |
| | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Rate This Thread | |
| |