| |||||||||
| George R R Martin Discuss the writings of author GRRM. |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Rate Thread |
| | #17 (permalink) |
| AryaUnderfoot Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 881
| Re: SPOILERS: A New Theory on Jon Yeah, farfetched is one word for it. Having been to West Virginia a couple of times, I know what incest can produce. It's not pretty. I'd rather not think of one of my favorite characters that way. If you're right, I'll forever be picturing Jon Snow with a mullet. |
| | |
| | #19 (permalink) | |
| Unreg. Mutant Moderator Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 3,005
| Re: SPOILERS: A New Theory on Jon Quote:
I think GRRM is leaving some pretty big hints that it is Rhaegar & Lyanna's child - there might be a twist in this but it would make more sense for there not to be! ![]() You're right about the lack of revulsion in the seven kingdoms towards incest - possibly because anyone saying suchlike probably got killed by the King & his wife/sister!! ![]() As a lot of GRRM's writing is inspired by historical settings, I wonder if this was? The only (mild) version of this which I am aware of is Queen Victoria being closely related to the Russian royal family and I think in the past, there were instances of close cousins marrying each other - nothing on the scale of brother/sister though (you wouldn't get much of a political or economic benefit, would you?) | |
| | |
| | #20 (permalink) |
| AryaUnderfoot Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 881
| Re: SPOILERS: A New Theory on Jon Okay here's a crazy theory: What is Lyanna was asexual, like a snail, and therefore was able to produce her own young without any help from a man? Just kidding... sorry, feeling a little weird today. |
| | |
| | #21 (permalink) | |
| Erikson is GOD > period Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 560
| Re: SPOILERS: A New Theory on Jon Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #22 (permalink) | |
| AryaUnderfoot Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 881
| Re: SPOILERS: A New Theory on Jon Quote:
Also, Hodor, I'm not sure how long it has been since you've revisited the states, but... BEWARE. Mullets are coming back. I know, it's sad, but the advent of the retro-80's fashion, complete with legwarmers, dragged some of the bad hair with it. | |
| | |
| | #23 (permalink) |
| Erikson is GOD > period Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 560
| Re: SPOILERS: A New Theory on Jon Oh jeez! I am glad my daughter will be born in France then... I was in Phoenix for christmas but never noticed anything stranger than the usual... hmmm did I just say that? |
| | |
| | #25 (permalink) | |
| Registered User Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 69
| Re: SPOILERS: A New Theory on Jon Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #29 (permalink) |
| AryaUnderfoot Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 881
| Re: SPOILERS: A New Theory on Jon Okay so I'm wondering about some more obscure characters that have sort of left the scene, but I'm beginning to think that they'll have bigger parts to play. The first one that comes to mind is Gendry. I think he'll pop up later on for sure, and maybe find out that he's Robert's bastard. Also, did anyone else notice that he may have feelings for Arya that are beyond just those of a good friend? |
| | |
| | #30 (permalink) |
| Registered User Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 69
| Re: SPOILERS: A New Theory on Jon I certainly did notice that, Arya. But I feel like Gendry might be an abandoned storyline though. He was important when Ned was still trying to hold the kingdom together, but things have progressed so far past that now. The best we can hope is that Gendry will rule house baratheon after Stannis is killed by the Others. |
| | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Rate This Thread | |
| |