| |||||||||
| George R R Martin Discuss the writings of author GRRM. |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Rate Thread |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| Registered User Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 30
| George R. R. Martin v. Robert Jordan I am trying to choose which one to read first. The wheel of time series or a song of ice and fire. Both have been well received and I am trying to pick which to read first. I am leaning towards A Song of Ice and Fire because it is shorter and I don't currently have that much time to dedicate to finishing the whole wheel of time series. Also, though this is off topic, any good warhammer 40,000 books? My friend likes them a lot so I thought I would try them out. |
| | |
| | #5 (permalink) |
| Registered User Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 30
| Re: George R. R. Martin v. Robert Jordan Jeez, I am now feeling like not even reading either series until they are done. The twelfth book of WoT is coming out in around a year (I think) and the fifth book in ASoIaF is coming out in a couple of months, but WoT is ending with the twelfth. God, I am so confused with this. I think I am probably just going to go and read something else now. Is ASoIaF ending with A Dance With Dragons? I think I'll just wait till 2009 and then start reading the two because they are both projected to be done by then. The Ace, why wouldn't you read them? viZion, where did you get that number? |
| | |
| | #6 (permalink) |
| wandering Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,229
| Re: George R. R. Martin v. Robert Jordan As far as I know ASoIaF is planned to be a 7 book series and with the 5th book out in a few months 10 years might be a little long but it is likely to be at least 3-5 years. As much as I liked the begining of WoT it really lost it's way after a few books. ASoIaF isn't one of my favourites but if you don't mind waiting on the last couple it is a very good read but there's also a lot of finished series that are well worth reading, rather then throw some suggestions in here have a look at some of the threads in the General Book Discussion area and get a whole heap of opinons .But if you're going to read one of those two I'd definitely go with ASoIaF. |
| | |
| | #7 (permalink) |
| Registered Demonminder Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 4
| Re: George R. R. Martin v. Robert Jordan If your short of time Id definately go for Martin, its a real page turner, and I got through the first five in a fortnight, they are really hard to put down once you get started. |
| | |
| | #9 (permalink) |
| The internet is srs bsns. Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 365
| Re: George R. R. Martin v. Robert Jordan It was 5 years between A Storm of Swords and A Feast for Crows. It's been 3 years since AFFC was released and *maybe* we'll see A Dance with Dragons at the end of this year (don't hold your breath). It just takes GRRM a long time to put out books (not trying to start a flame war with that statement; just stating a fact). So my estimate is that the 7th book will be out ten years from now. Hopefully, it's more like six years. I'll be waiting patiently no matter how long it takes. To me, A Song of Ice and Fire is the greatest fantasy series ever created. |
| | |
| | #10 (permalink) |
| Lemming of Discord Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,123
| Re: George R. R. Martin v. Robert Jordan There are various options here. Wheel of Time is longer - 12 volumes - but it is nearly complete. Brandon Sanderson is about a third of the way through writing Book 12 as we speak, and it is projected to be out in September-October 2009. It will also take you a fair way to work your way through the proceeding 11 books. OTOH, Wheel of Time is widely criticised for going off the boil around Book 7 or so, and Books 8-10 are pretty dull and boring (10 especially), although things pick up a lot in Book 11. You also have to appreciate that the author died whilst the last book was incomplete, and it is being finished by someone with a notably different writing style to Jordan. The story will end and may end well (Sanderson is a decent writer, although not outstanding) but the late-series dip in quality and the shift in writing style for the final volume means it isn't a very consistent series. That said, I'd rank Books 1-7 as being very enjoyable and entertaining with some excellent concepts and ideas, and one of the best takes on magic I've ever encountered (essentially, magic treated as just another form of physics). A Song of Ice and Fire is better on many levels, and widely praised as the best epic fantasy series around at the moment. However, it is further from completion. Book 5 comes out either at the end of this year or the start of next, and it will likely be 3 years apiece for Books 6 and 7. However, there is a compromise with ASoIaF. The series was originally designed as two trilogies separated by a five-year gap, but that was abandoned and the fourth volume (and elements of the fifth) was introduced to bridge that gap. However, although the gap is dead the first three books can still be read as a somewhat self-contained series. Book 3 ends with the characters 'plateaued' or left in interesting new situations but not on cliffhangers (as Book 4 ends). It is possible to read up to Book 3 and then go off and read something else. Whether you can do that or not is up to you: a lot of people find it impossible to resist moving straight onto Book 4, although it has a lot less closure than Book 3 (and I suspect Book 5 will have less still). Or you could table both for now and go and read one of the many excellent completed series around (may I recommend Joe Abercrombie's excellent First Law trilogy?), or check out Steven Erikson's Malazan series, which is similarly huge (ten volumes) but a lot closer to completion (Book 8 out in about three weeks, the writer's already halfway through writing Book 9). As for W40K, the books are largely supposed to be pretty bad apart from those written by Dan Abnett. The Gaunt's Ghosts series is supposed to be very good. |
| | |
| | #11 (permalink) |
| Registered User Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 63
| Re: George R. R. Martin v. Robert Jordan The new Horus Heresy series is okay, particularly the ones written by Dan Abnett. I think Legion by Dan Abnett was the first GW book I would actually list as a good book and not "good for a GW book." |
| | |
| | #12 (permalink) |
| Registered User Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 30
| Re: George R. R. Martin v. Robert Jordan For W40k, I've heard that eisenhorn, the horus heresy series, and Gaunt's Ghosts are good. I think I'll probably read those three series and then if I like them continue or just stop there as I expect I probably will. I usually prefer fantasy over scifi anyways. After hearing all of this criticism for WoT and ASoIaF, is there actually anything that would really compel me to read them right now? All I hear is negatives, it's so weird. For WoT, the first thing I hear is Robert Jordan dying and the 7-10'th books sucking like hell. For ASoIaF, I hear huge amounts of time between books and George R. R. Martin continuously pushing back release dates (like a lot of video games these days). Is there anything good!?! Right now, I am leaning towards ASoIaF and am developing what is becoming an aversion to WoT, except ASoIaF is not even finished and won't be for a while. Should I even read them during this year? I think I'll wait until 2009 and see how the last WoT book is received by its audiences and see if George R. R. Martin will actually release A Dance With Dragons. |
| | |
| | #13 (permalink) | |
| Registered User Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 63
| Re: George R. R. Martin v. Robert Jordan Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #14 (permalink) |
| Yes, It Comes with Freys Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 282
| Re: George R. R. Martin v. Robert Jordan My two cents.... I couldn't even make it through the Eye of the World the first time, and i have probably read every Martin book at least 4 times. I would have to say Jordan's writing to me is very paint by numbers, I never got a sense of suspense and he seemed rather predictable. Martin on the other hand has had me throw the book across the room with the "you did what?!!" feeling. While I do read science fiction/fantasy it is not the mainstay of my reading diet, and Martin actually brought me back to reading this genre after about 15 years. I recommend Martin to people who never read science fiction and they enjoy it, largely because the writing is epic, suspenseful and frankly a large amount of unexpected twists. I have compared his writing to Zola and Clavell, I don't know who I would compare Jordan to, because I have probably only found 5-6 books in my lifetime unfinishable. |
| | |
| | #15 (permalink) |
| Uberly purple Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 363
| Re: George R. R. Martin v. Robert Jordan Personally speaking I prefer Martin. I find them easier to read and the pace is much quicker. It's also a lot more earthy. So if you're a bit on the prudish side he won't be for you. |
| | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Rate This Thread | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Justice League Movie Ideas | demolition18 | General Media Discussion | 6 | 14th February 2008 07:47 PM |
| My Follow Up Ideas | demolition18 | Smallville | 1 | 31st December 2005 07:47 PM |
| Graphic novels by George RR Martin, Robert Jordan and Raymond E Feist. | Lacedaemonian | Graphic Novels and Comics | 12 | 17th August 2004 08:06 AM |
| RDA Tech-TV interview | CynVision | Stargate General Discussions | 29 | 1st July 2002 07:11 PM |