| |
|
| | #1 (permalink) |
| Administrator Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 960
| Terminator 3? It's just out in the UK at the moment, but we still haven't had a babysitter for Matrix-Reloaded yet - maybe this week??. Anyway, I'm simply curious of the impressions from anyone who's actually seen T3 - does it stand well either on its own, or in conjunction with the other films? Or is T3 simply an expensive and pointless cash-cow? |
| | |
| | #2 (permalink) |
| Spirit of Zebulun Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 187
| Re:Terminator 3? T3 is a FUN movie. You'll be entertained from beginning to end. As far as I'm concerned, that's what a movie should be. Who cares if the plot has been the same for all three Terminator movies. (smile) 12 |
| | |
| | #3 (permalink) |
| Administrator Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 960
| Re:Terminator 3? Ah - you're probably right. I can be a real snob when it comes to film, but at the moment even just fun is quite appealing. As I've never subscribed to a deep and meaningful exploration of the Terminator universe, I'm sure there won't be any real criticism on that front. ![]() |
| | |
| | #4 (permalink) |
| Junior Member Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 8
| Re:Terminator 3? Okay, here is my opinion on the T3 movie (i know I am setting myself up for some major flaming probably). Okay, first let me say, please ignore the fact that I am obviously female. I enjoy a good "blow everything to pieces" movie as much as the next guy. But in my opinion, T3 could have done a lot better. Some of the action sequences were good, but it was basically the same exact plot, lines, and even jokes - all over again. There was virtually no new material. It was great seeing Arnie again in a Terminator flick, but the rest of the cast (especially using Claire Danes), just ruined the whole idea. To me it seems they were doing what the Karate Kid people did with theirs when they brought a woman in as the main character. It would have been a lot better if they could have come up with an original plot line for this one. All in all, its okay for an action flick...I mean, there have been MUCH worse movies made (*cough* feardotcom *cough*), but the 1st & 2nd ones were much better done in my humble opinion ![]() |
| | |
| | #6 (permalink) | ||
| Registered User Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: UK: ENGLAND:
Posts: 567
| Re:Terminator 3? Sorry but rant really required OK... .. ... please excuse my endulgance. ... ..... ... .. [inhaling] .. ... .. .. ... . <<<<<WARNING - POSSIBLE SPOILER>>>>>> <<<<<WARNING - POSSIBLE (NO DEFINATE) SPOILING OF THE TERMINATOR LEGACY>>>>> Quote:
Quote:
I think the only redeemable feature in the whole film (bar Arnie obviously) had to be the ending, and it would have worked even without the rest of the plot-irradications. It was somewhat unexpected, and very downbeat for a Hollywood film, however even still, there was no aftermath scenes, which more-or-less made it a trailer for the next film. Unfortunately the general consensus seems to be one of mass approval, so I expect T4 and T5 (both of which are confirmed) to be equally soul-destroying. I'm not holding my breath for them........ P.S. And on an incredibly nerdy geeky nitpicking footnote Question - How do you make a Terminator thats made out of 100% liquid metal more advanced? Answer - Put a skeleton inside it. (Yeah that was a nerdy point - but a valid one) ... .. ... ... .. . [exhaling now] .. ... ... . .. . .... .. . Now nobody mention T3 again - LOL | ||
| | |
|
| About | Link To Us | For Writers | For Publishers | Privacy | Terms of Use | Copyright | Press | XML/RSS | Contact Us © Copyright Science Fiction Fantasy Chronicles 2003-2008 |