| My take on this is, for the way that they reacted to Daniel's condition was that it was generally valid. Yes, they might of 'jumped to conclusions', not about the condition itself (the symptoms were 'textbook schizophrenia') but the cause of it: They thought that because they could find and environmental cuase of it, the stargate, then that *was* the cause. No-one took into account that it might not be entirly natural.
Mackenzie had the medical symptoms, and the 'visual and auditory hallucinations', he made a judgement based on what he had. This begs the question if he, and to an extent Fraiser, are not willing to consider the kinds of weird situations these people get themselves into, then what are they doing working with them in the first place? |