| | #1 (permalink) |
| closing down Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: [I am a spambot, selecting the default option - ban me!]
Posts: 848
Blog Entries: 6 | Robot evolution 80. Robots Evolve And Learn How to Lie | Robots | DISCOVER Magazine Robots can evolve to communicate with each other, to help, and even to deceive each other, according to Dario Floreano of the Laboratory of Intelligent Systems at the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology. Floreano and his colleagues outfitted robots with light sensors, rings of blue light, and wheels and placed them in habitats furnished with glowing “food sources” and patches of “poison” that recharged or drained their batteries. Their neural circuitry was programmed with just 30 “genes,” elements of software code that determined how much they sensed light and how they responded when they did. The robots were initially programmed both to light up randomly and to move randomly when they sensed light. To create the next generation of robots, Floreano recombined the genes of those that proved fittest—those that had managed to get the biggest charge out of the food source. The resulting code (with a little mutation added in the form of a random change) was downloaded into the robots to make what were, in essence, offspring. Then they were released into their artificial habitat. “We set up a situation common in nature—foraging with uncertainty,” Floreano says. “You have to find food, but you don’t know what food is; if you eat poison, you die.” Four different types of colonies of robots were allowed to eat, reproduce, and expire. By the 50th generation, the robots had learned to communicate—lighting up, in three out of four colonies, to alert the others when they’d found food or poison. The fourth colony sometimes evolved “cheater” robots instead, which would light up to tell the others that the poison was food, while they themselves rolled over to the food source and chowed down without emitting so much as a blink. Some robots, though, were veritable heroes. They signaled danger and died to save other robots. “Sometimes,” Floreano says, “you see that in nature—an animal that emits a cry when it sees a predator; it gets eaten, and the others get away—but I never expected to see this in robots.” |
| | |
| | #3 (permalink) |
| closing down Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: [I am a spambot, selecting the default option - ban me!]
Posts: 848
Blog Entries: 6 | Re: Robot evolution Here's the Big Dog robot, watch it keep its balance Weird: New Video of BigDog Quadruped Robot Is So Stunning It's Spooky |
| | |
| | #8 (permalink) | |
| resident pedantissimo | Re: Robot evolution Quote:
Governments, big business, the military – all paragons of truthfulness who could never consider a distortion of reality a positive factor, even if it gave them an advantage. But evolution doesn't give you what you want, unless your limit conditions are very well defined; it gives you what can best survive in a given set of conditions. Intelligent design might be a bit better, but that's what's being used to get the computing we have now, and enough random factors mix in to keep me confused even so. I am reminded of Rudy Rucker's "boppers". (Software, et al) | |
| | |
| | #9 (permalink) | |
| Luna tick | Re: Robot evolution Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #10 (permalink) |
| Mod of Awesome Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Oregon
Posts: 3,724
| Re: Robot evolution Women use subtlety and subterfuge, its not our fault we think on a higher evolutionary scale then the easily persuaded male. :P Robots are machines. They should not evolve. |
| | |
| | #14 (permalink) | |
| Science fiction fantasy Join Date: Nov 2009 Location: Nepal
Posts: 130
| Re: Robot evolution Quote:
A safer, and easier concept to implement is one that's been around quite awhile in electronics and software. It's called "control theory, or "feedback". The robot can add "memories" of the consequences of their actions, and learn what to do, and what not to do. They would of course have a basic list of do's and dont's programmed in. This is the less strict form of AI, where there is software code added, but none of the original software is re-written "on the fly". That last phrase is the perfect lead-in to my next suggestion, that Jet airplanes are essential big powerful robots. With all of the advances in inertial navigation, and GPS positioning, Passenger Jets can take off, stay on course, and land. The tricky bit about lining up with the passenger loading ramp could be done with sensors and such, but it's just too expensive. That is always the anathema of such advancements. Cheaper isn't necessarily better. | |
| | |
| | #15 (permalink) |
| At the end of reality | Re: Robot evolution I agree with you on this one, Moonbat, and to answer the question, they should "evolve" in every sense of the word because, although the ARE artificial, they are INTELLIGENT artifice. Just because something's natural doesn't mean it should evolve-do rocks evolve? Just because something is artifice doesn't mean it shouldn't. Intelligent design evolves to adapt and survive. Even plants have intelligence to some certain extent. Rocks and water doesn't, just like robots have intelligence where a monkey wrench doesn't. |
| | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Rate This Thread | |
| |