The UK's largest Science Fiction & Fantasy Forums

Go Back   Science Fiction Fantasy Chronicles: forums > Books and Writing > Authors > George R R Martin



George R R Martin Discuss the writings of author GRRM.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rating: Thread Rating: 5 votes, 5.00 average.
Old 22nd February 2005, 01:59 PM   #136 (permalink)
Erikson is GOD > period
 
hodor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 560
Re: SPOILERS: Theory on Jon

The idea of predominant genetic appearances have come up more than once in this book. Baratheon, Lannister, Stark, and Targeryan to name the most mentioned. There is something here. Or is there not. I believe it is both. I believe the author is driving us somewhere with this as it has been brought up more than once. I believe that the Targeryan traits shall remain strong... and the Baratheon as well... there involvement outside of marriage, now that's a toss-up. Both families could have gone outside of marriage to produce bastards; the only question in my mind is the predominance of Stark genes.
hodor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd February 2005, 05:49 AM   #137 (permalink)
Keep Moving Forward!
 
Culhwch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 3,986
Blog Entries: 8
Re: SPOILERS: Theory on Jon

Quote:
Originally Posted by Raven
Targaryen traits have been shown (in The Hedge Knight) to be recessive under the right conditions - Baelor Breakspear had neither silver hair nor purple eyes.
I don't know - the one Targaryen whose true identity needs to be hidden just happens to be born with none of the Targaryen traits? That's one hell of a coincidence. Plus, Stark traits can also be shown to be recessive - more so than Targaryens. Of Ned's five trueborn children, only one has Stark traits, the others all take after their mother. That's eighty percent recessive. So I'm sticking with Ned as Jon's father, or at the least, his father not being Rhaegar.
Culhwch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd February 2005, 11:54 AM   #138 (permalink)
Corn!
 
Raven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 354
Re: SPOILERS: Theory on Jon

Culhwch - see other thread for my comments on this. One of Rhaegar's two children didn't look like him, for one thing: for another, 'dominance' and 'recessiveness' in Westeros work basically as GRRM wants them to work.
Raven is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd February 2005, 12:34 PM   #139 (permalink)
Erikson is GOD > period
 
hodor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 560
Re: SPOILERS: Theory on Jon

Aye the only time gene dominance has been referred to was in Targeryan (incest) and Baratheon situations. Nobody ever talks about Targaryan genes outside of that nor Baratheon outside of Robert.
hodor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th March 2005, 12:13 AM   #140 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 14
Re: SPOILERS: Theory on Jon

The wall wont be standing when Dany comes...so Jon will be released from his oath. The watch will be no more.
WinterIsComing is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th March 2005, 02:30 AM   #141 (permalink)
AryaUnderfoot
 
AryaUnderfoot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 881
Re: SPOILERS: Theory on Jon

Quote:
Originally Posted by Culhwch
Plus, Stark traits can also be shown to be recessive - more so than Targaryens. Of Ned's five trueborn children, only one has Stark traits, the others all take after their mother. That's eighty percent recessive. So I'm sticking with Ned as Jon's father, or at the least, his father not being Rhaegar.
As I've said before, just because one out of five Stark children were born with Stark traits from Ned, doesn't mean that the first and only child borne by Lyanna wouldn't bear the same traits. Genetics don't stand in line and get picked by the team leader, with the weakest player being picked last.
AryaUnderfoot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th March 2005, 09:59 AM   #142 (permalink)
Corn!
 
Raven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 354
Re: SPOILERS: Theory on Jon

WinterIsComing: the NW oath says nothing about the Wall. The Wall is a tool they use to fulfil their oath, not the oath itself. The NW oath is to protect the realm, and that remains whether the Wall does or not.
Raven is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th March 2005, 03:00 PM   #143 (permalink)
Admin and Tea-boy
 
I, Brian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 5,603
Blog Entries: 1
Re: SPOILERS: Theory on Jon

Quote:
Originally Posted by WinterIsComing
The wall wont be standing when Dany comes...so Jon will be released from his oath. The watch will be no more.
$10 says the Others are already past the Wall before Danaerys gets involved.
I, Brian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th March 2005, 10:56 PM   #144 (permalink)
AryaUnderfoot
 
AryaUnderfoot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 881
Re: SPOILERS: Theory on Jon

I see your bet, I, Brian, and I raise you a shiny nickel.
AryaUnderfoot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th March 2005, 05:12 PM   #145 (permalink)
Boo!
 
red_temple's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 357
Re: SPOILERS: Theory on Jon

Quote:
Originally Posted by AryaUnderfoot
I see your bet, I, Brian, and I raise you a shiny nickel.
I call foul!!!! Minimum raise is the amount of the previous bet.
red_temple is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th March 2005, 10:16 PM   #146 (permalink)
Admin and Tea-boy
 
I, Brian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 5,603
Blog Entries: 1
Re: SPOILERS: Theory on Jon

Minimum bet is a shekel.
I, Brian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th March 2005, 12:28 AM   #147 (permalink)
AryaUnderfoot
 
AryaUnderfoot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 881
Re: SPOILERS: Theory on Jon

But shiny nickels are so pretty! How can you resist the shiny nickel?
AryaUnderfoot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21st March 2005, 02:38 PM   #148 (permalink)
Boo!
 
red_temple's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 357
Re: SPOILERS: Theory on Jon

I suppose it depends on *how* shiny it is. Is it average shiny or really shiny?


Although I'd have to admit a shekel would be really cool.....
red_temple is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21st March 2005, 08:06 PM   #149 (permalink)
AryaUnderfoot
 
AryaUnderfoot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 881
Re: SPOILERS: Theory on Jon

Quote:
Originally Posted by red_temple
I suppose it depends on *how* shiny it is. Is it average shiny or really shiny?


Although I'd have to admit a shekel would be really cool.....
I'm talking magpie shiny... oh, and shekels are worth very little, aren't they?

Why not start it all off with a Valar Morghulis coin? I'd love to get my hands on one of those.
AryaUnderfoot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21st March 2005, 08:24 PM   #150 (permalink)
Boo!
 
red_temple's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 357
Re: SPOILERS: Theory on Jon

Well, if you ever do get your hands on one of those coins, make sure you let me know. Then I'll make sure that I never, never p!ss you off...
red_temple is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:30 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.