Science Fiction Fantasy
Science Fiction & Fantasy Portal:   |  HOME   |  FORUM   |   Other forums   |   Amazon.co.uk   |   Amazon.com

 


Go Back   Science Fiction Fantasy Chronicles: forums > Film & TV > Featured Films > Lord of the Rings
Register Forum RULES Members List Gallery Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread
Old 27th July 2007, 07:43 PM   #1 (permalink)
Naryaló S dú
Lord of Science
 
Naryaló S dú's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 72
Lightbulb Film vs. Book: Battles

Doesn't it seem that the number of orcs wasn't accurately defined in both The Battle of Helm's Deep or The Battle of Minas Tirith. In the book there was like 10,000 orcs seiging Helm's Deep, and 100'000's seiging minas tirith, though the numbers shown in the film didn't seem to differ that much (even though The Battle of Minas Tirith was shown as larger and more complex). What's your thoughts on this?
Naryaló S dú is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th July 2007, 11:08 AM   #2 (permalink)
paranoid marvin
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Lancashire
Posts: 185
Re: Film vs. Book: Battles

The films focus more on the mini-battles featuring our heroes , as to be fair, do the books. Regardless of the size of the enemy army , Jackson capably presents the scenario of a small band of warriors defending against a numerically far superior force
paranoid marvin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd August 2007, 09:52 AM   #3 (permalink)
Rider
Basileus kai Autokratōr
 
Rider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Estonia
Posts: 46
Re: Film vs. Book: Battles

Well, Tolkien also, described a band of soldiers engaging the enemy, not how the entire battle played out. But if I remember correctly, then he didn't mention the number of persons in the Battle of the Pelennor Fields, only the peoples in it... The only battle for which I remember correct numbers was the Battle of Morannon which was at 'less than 6,000' for Gondor, Rohan and Dol Amroth together.
Rider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd August 2007, 03:42 PM   #4 (permalink)
Delvo
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: USA:
Posts: 423
Re: Film vs. Book: Battles

Quote:
Originally Posted by Naryaló S dú View Post
In the book there was like 10,000 orcs seiging Helm's Deep, and 100'000's seiging minas tirith, though the numbers shown in the film didn't seem to differ that much
I don't know how you could manage to come up with something so far off. The number of enemy soldiers shown was indeed very different between the two settings. In the CGI that they used for "army" scenes, you just tell it how many to make, and that's how many it makes. Screenshots will show this quite easily.
Delvo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th October 2007, 02:49 AM   #5 (permalink)
fingy773
BABTISE THE UTE
 
fingy773's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Australia, Victoria
Posts: 113
Re: Film vs. Book: Battles

in the movie saruman mentions that he has 10s of thousands of uruks to wormtounge
fingy773 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th October 2007, 05:09 PM   #6 (permalink)
power 0wns
The master of all evil.
 
power 0wns's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: UK: ENGLAND:
Posts: 20
Re: Film vs. Book: Battles

hmm. they were quite good making the films to be honest, i have to say you cant beat the book, the film was really good, apart from aragorn, he was described as a pretty uglycharacter the books, rough skin sort of thing. Everyone was going crazy over him, but he was good at acting ( vigo mortisn or summin) the battles were to scale but its hard to make the big battles into film as you can only view on part of the siege at a time, unless you would not be able to see anything because the cameras would be to far away for detail,

power 0wns, thnx
power 0wns is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd November 2007, 06:50 PM   #7 (permalink)
misterwong
Science fiction fantasy
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Czech Republic
Posts: 15
Re: Film vs. Book: Battles

i think that film was better than book
misterwong is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd November 2007, 10:14 PM   #8 (permalink)
sarakoth
Uncool
 
sarakoth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Durham
Posts: 187
Re: Film vs. Book: Battles

Quote:
Originally Posted by misterwong View Post
i think that film was better than book
You're one of the few people who think that.

Although the movies were very good, I think the theatrical versions were too cut down.
sarakoth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd November 2007, 11:53 PM   #9 (permalink)
pyan
Moderator
 
pyan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Hampshire
Posts: 4,115
Re: Film vs. Book: Battles

Though in general I enjoyed the films, and especially the big battle scenes (Battle of the Last Alliance, Helm's Deep, and the Pelennor Fields) I do wish Mr Jackson hadn't taken so many liberties with the text...Elves at Helm's Deep? Pshaw!
pyan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th November 2007, 12:23 AM   #10 (permalink)
paranoid marvin
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Lancashire
Posts: 185
Re: Film vs. Book: Battles

Quote:
Originally Posted by pyan View Post
Though in general I enjoyed the films, and especially the big battle scenes (Battle of the Last Alliance, Helm's Deep, and the Pelennor Fields) I do wish Mr Jackson hadn't taken so many liberties with the text...Elves at Helm's Deep? Pshaw!
tbh I think we got off lightly , considering what Hollywood usually does with book adaptations

It very easily have ended up more akin to 'Dude , Where's My Ring?' than Tolkein's vision
paranoid marvin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th November 2007, 12:30 AM   #11 (permalink)
Ursa major
Bearly Believable
 
Ursa major's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: UK: ENGLAND:
Posts: 1,341
Re: Film vs. Book: Battles

I don't think the film misrepresented the different scales of the battles.

In the Battle of Helm's Deep, the orcs attacked over a relatively narrow front. At the Battle of Minas Tirith, the attackers are shown as covering the plain that lies in front of the city, which would require far far more troops.
Ursa major is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th November 2007, 08:36 PM   #12 (permalink)
sarakoth
Uncool
 
sarakoth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Durham
Posts: 187
Re: Film vs. Book: Battles

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ursa major View Post
I don't think the film misrepresented the different scales of the battles.

In the Battle of Helm's Deep, the orcs attacked over a relatively narrow front. At the Battle of Minas Tirith, the attackers are shown as covering the plain that lies in front of the city, which would require far far more troops.
In the film, Sauron's army DID cover the plain that lis in front of Minas Tirith hence the name, Battle of the Pellenor Fields.
sarakoth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th November 2007, 08:37 PM   #13 (permalink)
sarakoth
Uncool
 
sarakoth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Durham
Posts: 187
Re: Film vs. Book: Battles

Quote:
Originally Posted by pyan View Post
Though in general I enjoyed the films, and especially the big battle scenes (Battle of the Last Alliance, Helm's Deep, and the Pelennor Fields) I do wish Mr Jackson hadn't taken so many liberties with the text...Elves at Helm's Deep? Pshaw!
Jackson got this inspiration from a line from the book. Legolas said that the battle would be so much easier if they got a couple hundred Elven archers.
sarakoth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th November 2007, 08:56 PM   #14 (permalink)
pyan
Moderator
 
pyan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Hampshire
Posts: 4,115
Re: Film vs. Book: Battles

Quote:
Originally Posted by sarakoth View Post
Jackson got this inspiration from a line from the book. Legolas said that the battle would be so much easier if they got a couple hundred Elven archers.
That's as may be....but I'll always be annoyed that he stuck things like this in.
Why? It adds nothing to the result of the battle, annoys the purists, and flies completely in the face of common sense: in order to get there on time, they'd have had to have left Rivendell at least 10 days beforehand - when the still unbroken Fellowship were still floating down the river from Lorien!
pyan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th November 2007, 09:57 PM   #15 (permalink)
Ursa major
Bearly Believable
 
Ursa major's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: UK: ENGLAND:
Posts: 1,341
Re: Film vs. Book: Battles

Quote:
Originally Posted by sarakoth View Post
In the film, Sauron's army DID cover the plain that lis in front of Minas Tirith hence the name, Battle of the Pellenor Fields.
I think you could agree with me using fewer words, you know.
Ursa major is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Justice League Movie Ideas demolition18 General Media Discussion 6 14th February 2008 07:47 PM
Publicity for your book dwndrgn Aspiring Writers 3 8th February 2008 09:10 PM
Another book search - Fantasy SSpears Book Search 2 19th January 2007 11:48 AM
Book Club Re-Vamp Coming dwndrgn Book Club 29 9th October 2005 09:52 PM
Where the Film differs from the Book (TTT) (Contains Spoilers!) ray gower J R R Tolkien 18 20th February 2003 12:59 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:05 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0 ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.

About | Link To Us | For Writers | For Publishers | Privacy | Terms of Use | Copyright | Press | XML/RSS | Contact Us

© Copyright Science Fiction Fantasy Chronicles 2003-2008