Go Back   Science Fiction Fantasy Chronicles: forums > Books and Writing > Authors > Steven Erikson

Steven Erikson Books of Malazan etc

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread
Old 11th June 2007, 03:39 PM   #1 (permalink)
S.M.R.T.
 
Wiggum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 883
Thanks. Thanks A Lot.

Actually just want to say after finishing Bonehunters that the reason I delved into Erikson was this forum.

Now I'm addicted to his version of fantasy crack and I have to spend $30 to get Reapers Gale in a trade paperback from a specialty dealer who's imported it, lol.

Martin still reigns supreme for me, but these six books have been an utterly amazing and enjoyable ride.

Jeebus, Karsa, Icarium and Rhulad all together......barely want to think about it.

And I agree with previous arguments that I've read that Kalam, well, should have been more final.
Wiggum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th June 2007, 05:37 PM   #2 (permalink)
Old KiwiBird
 
Peeves's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Belgium
Posts: 1,347
Re: Thanks. Thanks A Lot.

You might be a bit dissapointed by the Karsa-Icarium-Rhulad trio though, the rest of the book is good.
Peeves is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th June 2007, 06:07 PM   #3 (permalink)
S.M.R.T.
 
Wiggum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 883
Re: Thanks. Thanks A Lot.

lol, Thanks. Thanks A Lot.
Wiggum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th June 2007, 08:16 PM   #4 (permalink)
Fierce Vowelless One
 
dwndrgn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,823
Re: Thanks. Thanks A Lot.

Oh my you made me laugh out loud! I generally have the patience (just barely) to at least wait for the paperback version of my habit.
dwndrgn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th June 2007, 08:47 PM   #5 (permalink)
Fish Proder
 
Jason_Taverner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: UK: ENGLAND:
Posts: 663
Re: Thanks. Thanks A Lot.

feed your habit hahaha,
Jason_Taverner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th June 2007, 09:52 PM   #6 (permalink)
Red Rane
 
Rane Longfox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Greater Manchester
Posts: 3,342
Re: Thanks. Thanks A Lot.

Heheh, good news You're welcome, glad you enjoy them!

You won't be dissapointed though
Rane Longfox is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th June 2007, 10:16 PM   #7 (permalink)
S.M.R.T.
 
Wiggum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 883
Re: Thanks. Thanks A Lot.

So I'm going to designate this thread as spoilers allowed through Bonehunters

And am going to start with the easier questions, what's the difference between a Soletaken and a D'ivers?

I'm assuming a Soletaken is born unto a humanoid race, and can shift it's form when it chooses. It seems from what I've read a D'ivers is almost a mixed race unto itself, born unto its form and doesn't change.

Wrong, right, and why were they both following the path of the hand towards ascendancy (aka, why are they related to eachother, not physically, but within Erikson's mind and my reading) ?
Wiggum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th June 2007, 10:32 PM   #8 (permalink)
Red Rane
 
Rane Longfox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Greater Manchester
Posts: 3,342
Re: Thanks. Thanks A Lot.

Mostly wrong D'ivers are just another form of Soletaken, really. They're, as far as we know, all humanoid, but while Soletaken can semble into a form of an animal (as far as we know, just one form - they can't change into others), D'ivers can semble into many versions of the same animal. Again, the animal doesn't vary for each D'ivers. The wolves hunting Icarium and Mappo in Deadhouse gates was a d'ivers, as were the Dhenrabi Fiddler had to fire a cusser at. Urm... oh yeah, plus the "merchant" that guided Felisin Heboric and Baundin for a while - he was a D'ivers rat(s) called Gryllen, iirc.

But yeah, they're basically two kinds of shapeshifter. D'ivers are generally more powerful, for obvious numerical advantage. On the other hand, shapeshifting certainly seems to affect the person's mind - most of them are insane, and always stay in their animal forms - d'ivers are affected by this significantly more than soletaken, hence the impression maybe that they don't change...
Rane Longfox is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th June 2007, 10:42 PM   #9 (permalink)
S.M.R.T.
 
Wiggum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 883
Re: Thanks. Thanks A Lot.

Ever read one of your own posts and say "what?"

Edited to make sense.

Every Soletaken of note has had it's human form, I don't remember any D'ivers with one that has been introduced.

I forget the name of the D'ivers released in Bonehunters, but unless you can point a passage were Erikson explains it as something that has completely lost its mind (which you may well be able to do), I can't believe it was ever any tangible race. And anything undead, or with ice under it's nails doesn't count.

Last edited by Wiggum; 11th June 2007 at 10:55 PM.
Wiggum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th June 2007, 10:47 PM   #10 (permalink)
Red Rane
 
Rane Longfox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Greater Manchester
Posts: 3,342
Re: Thanks. Thanks A Lot.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wiggum View Post
Really?

Every Soletaken of note has had it's human form, I don't remember any D'ivers with one that has been introduced.
Dessimbelackis
Rane Longfox is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th June 2007, 11:14 PM   #11 (permalink)
S.M.R.T.
 
Wiggum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 883
Re: Thanks. Thanks A Lot.

Alrighty, then.

But if Dragons, from what it seems like, are the provence of Soletaken can D'ivers really be deemed as more powerful?

And, uhm, lol, I do have more pertinent questions, rofl, oh wait, hell no.

Treach is a Soletaken right? So is Anomander, right?

The Deragoth were a match for the unleashing of the pentultimate D'ivers, hell the Hounds of Shadow were well nigh it's match. Karsa Orlong killed two Deragoth, the ultimate D'ivers didn't. By logic, Karsa pw3ns the d'ivers, yet not the Soletaken. Karsa vs Rake, I'm taking Rake. There's a philosopihical difference between the two. I'm not sure what it is, but it's there.
Wiggum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th June 2007, 08:43 AM   #12 (permalink)
Registered User
 
baldur27's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 48
Re: Thanks. Thanks A Lot.

heres how I ungerstand it a D'ivers is one mind housed in multiple bodys whilst a soletaken is someone who can shapechange but its also possible to be both at once
baldur27 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th June 2007, 07:25 PM   #13 (permalink)
Fish Proder
 
Jason_Taverner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: UK: ENGLAND:
Posts: 663
Re: Thanks. Thanks A Lot.

Unless they spend too much time in their soultaken form and they loose their humianty and become more beast. Remember Trake was the first hero until he spent to much time as the wolf.

Dragons come about as soultaken as there is two kinds of dragons. Real from birth Dragon 100% real Dragons also know as Elient, (spelling?), as for soultaken it seems they come about from an asscendent drinking the blood of a dead/dieing Dragon.

I think I am correct Rane?
Jason_Taverner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th June 2007, 09:48 PM   #14 (permalink)
Red Rane
 
Rane Longfox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Greater Manchester
Posts: 3,342
Re: Thanks. Thanks A Lot.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jason_Taverner View Post
Unless they spend too much time in their soultaken form and they loose their humianty and become more beast. Remember Trake was the first hero until he spent to much time as the wolf.

Dragons come about as soultaken as there is two kinds of dragons. Real from birth Dragon 100% real Dragons also know as Elient, (spelling?), as for soultaken it seems they come about from an asscendent drinking the blood of a dead/dieing Dragon.

I think I am correct Rane?
Well, Trake/Treach was a tiger, not a wolf

As for the Elient... it's hard to say. There are pure-blood elient, such as the otataral dragon we see in House of Chains, and then there are soletaken, yes. But, we've only had it confirmed that Scabandari, Anomander and Silchas Ruin drank from the blood of Tiam (not just any dragon, mind - it has to be Tiam, as far as we know). But also, people such as Lady Envy, Menandore, Rud Ellale and others who haven't drunk any of her blood are also elient soletaken. Hence the impression that it's also, to a certain extent, hereditary. And yet Phaed and Nimander Golit, who we meet in Bonehunters, but are bigger characters in Reaper's Gale, are NOT soletaken, despite being Rake's grandchildren.

Basically, we don't know what exactly makes an elient soletaken, but it's a safe bet it's not just one answer
Rane Longfox is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13th June 2007, 12:33 AM   #15 (permalink)
Fish Proder
 
Jason_Taverner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: UK: ENGLAND:
Posts: 663
Re: Thanks. Thanks A Lot.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rane Longfox View Post
Well, Trake/Treach was a tiger, not a wolf



I always do that keep thinking of Togg and Fanderay, can't be the tiger of summer if you aren't a bloody tiger now can ya.

Do we know for a fact that Phaed and Nimander Golit are NOT soul taken, could it be because they are so many generations after Rake they have not received the soultaken powers, or do you think there is a chance Nimander Golit could come into them later,
Jason_Taverner is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:19 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2 ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.