Science Fiction Fantasy  
Go Back   Science Fiction Fantasy Chronicles: forums > Film & TV > Featured TV Series > Doctor Who

Doctor Who Splendid chaps!... All of them!

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread
Old 14th June 2007, 05:03 PM   #46 (permalink)
Press "X" to Admire Hat.
 
Lenny's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: [I am a spambot, selecting the default option - ban me!]
Posts: 3,581
Blog Entries: 3
Re: 29.10: Blink

Actually... there WAS some sort of explanation.

When Billy appeared in 1969, the Doctor told him that he must have been touched by the same angel as he was.
Lenny is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th June 2007, 05:04 PM   #47 (permalink)
Dark Lord
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Falkirk
Posts: 814
Re: 29.10: Blink

I'm afraid she couldnt be recued as she had by the time the doctor was recued, she had lived died and had people to carry on, also she would have not written that note to Sally, Sally would never have run the shop with her brother and never met the doctor earlier in his personal time frame.

Time travel is paradox, she was not recued as she could not be, as neither could that policeman, both were set in time and had a role to play to help Sally help the doctor eventually defeat the silent assasins.

It would have been far too dangerous to help either of them. As to her being dumped in 1920 they had more energy there I suspect they were running low when they caught the policeman.

Cause and effect consider who caused what to happen in this episode.
Ice fyre is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th June 2007, 06:52 PM   #48 (permalink)
Reetou Diplomatic Corp
 
PTeppic's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: North-west UK
Posts: 3,848
Re: 29.10: Blink

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ice fyre View Post
Cause and effect consider who caused what to happen in this episode.
I'd got my head round the episode until you said that. The cause, arguably is the Angels. The effect, the Doctor and Rose get sent back in time, but with advanced information, so they can send messages into the future (the hard/slow way) allowing earlier in (real) time our heroine to find and send back the TARDIS to rescue them.
PTeppic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th June 2007, 07:36 PM   #49 (permalink)
Fortiter et recte!
 
pyan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Southampton
Posts: 8,161
Re: 29.10: Blink

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lenny View Post
Actually... there WAS some sort of explanation.

When Billy appeared in 1969, the Doctor told him that he must have been touched by the same angel as he was.
Yes, I heard that too - I just assumed that different angels sent you back different amounts of time.
pyan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th June 2007, 07:44 PM   #50 (permalink)
Wherever I Am, I'm There
 
Dave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Greater London
Posts: 14,030
Blog Entries: 1
Re: 29.10: Blink

Quote:
Originally Posted by pyan View Post
Yes, I heard that too - I just assumed that different angels sent you back different amounts of time.
Which explains why one or two of them seemed to move more than the others - two of them reached the church opposite the police station, one took ages just moving through the garden, and one only moved from upstairs to downstairs. They would have had differing amounts of energy.
Dave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th June 2007, 12:47 PM   #51 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Warwickshire
Posts: 6
Re: 29.10: Blink

Quote:
Originally Posted by PTeppic View Post
I'd got my head round the episode until you said that. The cause, arguably is the Angels. The effect, the Doctor and Rose get sent back in time, but with advanced information, so they can send messages into the future (the hard/slow way) allowing earlier in (real) time our heroine to find and send back the TARDIS to rescue them.

Rose??? I take it you mean Martha - Rose has gone, get over it :-)
lukic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th June 2007, 08:43 PM   #52 (permalink)
Reetou Diplomatic Corp
 
PTeppic's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: North-west UK
Posts: 3,848
Re: 29.10: Blink

Ah - but it was Rose. The first time. It just was never televised...

It was only on a second encounter with the Angels that THIS mess happened... ;-)
PTeppic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th June 2007, 09:20 PM   #53 (permalink)
Fortiter et recte!
 
pyan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Southampton
Posts: 8,161
Re: 29.10: Blink

Nice catch, Pteppic!
pyan is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:40 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2 ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.