| |||||||
| Doctor Who Matt (Who?) Smith... David Tennant, Christopher Eccleston, Tom Baker, John Pertwee, the Daleks, and the Cybermen. |
| Welcome to the Science Fiction Fantasy Chronicles forums | |
| Welcome to the chronicles network, the UK's largest - and friendliest - science fiction and fantasy forums!
If you love to read or watch science fiction and fantasy, you've come to the right place to be among like-minded people. And we count published authors, editors, and agents among our members, so have an especially strong community of aspiring writers. To post or reply to a topic you'll need to register - but don't worry, it's free and we don't pass on any of your details to anyone else. | |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Rate Thread |
| | #46 (permalink) |
| Press "X" to Admire Hat. Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: [I am a spambot, selecting the default option - ban me!]
Posts: 3,343
Blog Entries: 3 | Re: 29.10: Blink Actually... there WAS some sort of explanation. When Billy appeared in 1969, the Doctor told him that he must have been touched by the same angel as he was. |
| | |
| | #47 (permalink) |
| Dark Lord Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Falkirk
Posts: 687
| Re: 29.10: Blink I'm afraid she couldnt be recued as she had by the time the doctor was recued, she had lived died and had people to carry on, also she would have not written that note to Sally, Sally would never have run the shop with her brother and never met the doctor earlier in his personal time frame. Time travel is paradox, she was not recued as she could not be, as neither could that policeman, both were set in time and had a role to play to help Sally help the doctor eventually defeat the silent assasins. It would have been far too dangerous to help either of them. As to her being dumped in 1920 they had more energy there I suspect they were running low when they caught the policeman. Cause and effect consider who caused what to happen in this episode. |
| | |
| | #48 (permalink) |
| Reetou Diplomatic Corp Join Date: May 2001 Location: North-west UK
Posts: 3,814
| Re: 29.10: Blink I'd got my head round the episode until you said that. The cause, arguably is the Angels. The effect, the Doctor and Rose get sent back in time, but with advanced information, so they can send messages into the future (the hard/slow way) allowing earlier in (real) time our heroine to find and send back the TARDIS to rescue them. |
| | |
| | #50 (permalink) |
| Wherever I Am, I'm There | Re: 29.10: Blink Which explains why one or two of them seemed to move more than the others - two of them reached the church opposite the police station, one took ages just moving through the garden, and one only moved from upstairs to downstairs. They would have had differing amounts of energy. |
| | |
| | #51 (permalink) | |
| Registered User Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Warwickshire
Posts: 6
| Re: 29.10: Blink Quote:
Rose??? I take it you mean Martha - Rose has gone, get over it :-) | |
| | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Rate This Thread | |
| |