star wars vs star trek the video

[Yoda]

YouTube - Star Trek vs. Star Wars

This is what you have been waiting for

[Yoda]

What did you think?

[Joel007]

Cool, quite good work on the cutscene pasting, and some good use of video game graphics I'm glad neither side won.

[Yoda]

I think the video shows that star wars are a bit better, because star trek retreated

[Yoda]

YouTube - Star Wars
watch this too

[Joel007]

they may have retreated because they were outnumbered

[filmnut]

pretty freakin cool.. years ago I saw patrick Stewart in an interview, and he mentioned a casual conversation he had with Carrie Fischer about a crossover movie... if only... what could have been...

[Majimaune]

Originally Posted by Yoda

I think the video shows that star wars are a bit better, because star trek retreated

Of course Star Wars should be shown as better. Its cause it is better.

Very well done with all the piecing together. Kudos to that man.

Lego one is very clever.

[sarakoth]

The only reason Star Wars is better is because George Lucas decided to make it that way (I mean the military technnology).

[Deathpool]

Look. There's a lot of issues to consider when comparing Star Wars and Star Trek. I'm a fan of both so here's what I've determined. If any of you watch, Startrek you'll notice that they don't use the type of phaser cannons Star Wars uses they use continues phaser beams which are far more powerful. The enterprise required more than four hits by the Warbird's torpedoes in Startrek six to penetrate its shields, which torpedoes are far more powerful than any phaser cannon except the death star’s weapon. The Deathstar, however could not hit any starship because of its maneuverability. Scientists on board the starships such as the Enterprise and Voyager can create weapons of mass destruction and wipe out the Deathstar. Considering all this and other issues including the transporter I've determined that Startrek would actually win.

[sarakoth]

Originally Posted by Deathpool

Look. There's a lot of issues to consider when comparing Star Wars and Star Trek. I'm a fan of both so here's what I've determined. If any of you watch, Startrek you'll notice that they don't use the type of phaser cannons Star Wars uses they use continues phaser beams which are far more powerful. The enterprise required more than four hits by the Warbird's torpedoes in Startrek six to penetrate its shields, which torpedoes are far more powerful than any phaser cannon except the death star’s weapon. The Deathstar, however could not hit any starship because of its maneuverability. Scientists on board the starships such as the Enterprise and Voyager can create weapons of mass destruction and wipe out the Deathstar. Considering all this and other issues including the transporter I've determined that Startrek would actually win.

Before anyone assumes anything, I want to make clear that I enjoy both. I don't want to refer to myself as a fan but I enjoy both.

According to official manuals, the firepower of Star Wars weapons far exceed those of Star Trek. Photon torpedoes are said to have 64 isotons of power. Iso is the prefix meaning one. Now, let us assume that the 64 isotons means the power generated by 64 isotons of antimatter. However, it requires about 10 to the 18 tons of antimatter to reduce a planet to rubble a la Death Star. In addition, the firepower of Star Destroyers outmatch Federation starships by degrees of millions. All this is because Star Wars is more fantastic and contrived while Star Trek tries to be reasonable.

[Deathpool]

As I said before the Deathstar is very large and has a very low maneuverability. When I researched the different technologies, I read about a race that developed a way to travel 10,000 light years in like 15 minutes. One parsec however is a little less than four light-years. Starwars traveled twelve parsecs in a few hours I believe. There you have it. Startrek is Actually the fastest. You forgot about the transporter as well. Once the Warbird engages it's cloaking only the Sith could find it. Even than, the transporter would be too fast for them. Why don't you study the two technologies as I have? That’s not accounting for other technologies such as a ship that can reinforce its shields to nearly any thickness and mimic any ship and weapons, the Borg, and Startrek’s time travel abilities. The Star destroyers may have more firepower than the Enterprise because the Enterprise uses phaser cannons, but many other ships don't. They use a continues phaser beam. Another problem is that I've found that is never taken into account is that the Weapons on a Star destroyer are in different places on the ship. Once again, the Enterprise took nearly four hits from the Warbird’s torpedoes before its shields were penetrated and I believe it was hit the same place each time. One or two phaser cannons are not like torpedoes. What's more, there is a race the Deathstar destructive power used in Startrek. Another thing is that the clones are terrible aims, but all the people in Startrek rarely, if ever miss their target. I’ve also heard that Startrek is invulnerable to phaser cannons, and in watching both I’ve seen that too. Let's not forget that Startrek race that has a weapon as powerful as the Deathstar even if it was copied from Starwars. Stop comparing Starwars ships with the Enterprise. Since that's obviously what you've done. Let's have the Nabo Starship fight the Warbird. You're not being fair. Tell you the truth, I like Starwars a little better than Startrek, but in studying the different technologies Startrek would win in an all out battle. Least that's if everything is included.

[sarakoth]

Originally Posted by Deathpool

As I said before the Deathstar is very large and has a very low maneuverability. When I researched the different technologies, I read about a race that developed a way to travel 10,000 light years in like 15 minutes. One parsec however is a little less than four light-years. Starwars traveled twelve parsecs in a few hours I believe. There you have it. Startrek is Actually the fastest. You forgot about the transporter as well. Once the Warbird engages it's cloaking only the Sith could find it. Even than, the transporter would be too fast for them. Why don't you study the two technologies as I have? That’s not accounting for other technologies such as a ship that can reinforce its shields to nearly any thickness and mimic any ship and weapons, the Borg, and Startrek’s time travel abilities. The Star destroyers may have more firepower than the Enterprise because the Enterprise uses phaser cannons, but many other ships don't. They use a continues phaser beam. Another problem is that I've found that is never taken into account is that the Weapons on a Star destroyer are in different places on the ship. Once again, the Enterprise took nearly four hits from the Warbird’s torpedoes before its shields were penetrated and I believe it was hit the same place each time. One or two phaser cannons are not like torpedoes. What's more, there is a race the Deathstar destructive power used in Startrek. Another thing is that the clones are terrible aims, but all the people in Startrek rarely, if ever miss their target. I’ve also heard that Startrek is invulnerable to phaser cannons, and in watching both I’ve seen that too. Let's not forget that Startrek race that has a weapon as powerful as the Deathstar even if it was copied from Starwars. Stop comparing Starwars ships with the Enterprise. Since that's obviously what you've done. Let's have the Nabo Starship fight the Warbird. You're not being fair. Tell you the truth, I like Starwars a little better than Startrek, but in studying the different technologies Startrek would win in an all out battle. Least that's if everything is included.

Actually, in Star Wars "parsec" is a unit of time while the real-life parsec is exactly what you've said, slightly less than four lightyears. In Star Wars, one can traverse a galaxy within a day. In Star Trek, it takes a starship one hundred years.Besides, the said speed of twelve parsecs in mere hours also exceeds that of Star Trek. The fastest Federation ships traveling at Warp 9 could go about 1000 lightyears in a year. By simple division, they could travel less than one parsec a day. (you seem to be contradicting yourself quite a bit. You also have a tendacy to repeat things I've already disproved) Also, the transporter only has a range of about 40000 kilometers, all it does is "copy" the exact make up of something and "paste" it somewhere else. The level of military technology in Star Wars exceeds that of Star Trek. The major Star Wars factions are able to deploy thousands of star destroyers while the Federation only has measly dozens of starships. A single Star Destroyer has more firepower than the entire Borg Collective! The Death Star can travel between planets just as easily as any starship. It could annihilate the entire Star Trek universe in a week.

[ghost8772]

ummm, you go into the written works, and they tried to correct. defining the kessel run as a distance, with a cluster of black holes impeding the route. the speed used made it so one could shave down the distance travelled. cheat the gravity some. check out the Han Solo Trilogy... though I can't recall the first two books names, the third one was Rebel Dawn. one of them described the events of him skirting the Maw ( name for the cluster of black holes).

[Overread]

GREAT!
brilliant!
funny!
oh wait: The Epire ships vs Starfleet - winners are the empire for one major purpose: the empire is built for war and battle, whist starfleet has only made one ship specificly for battle - the Defiant - the rest of the fleet, whilst strong - is not equipped for warfare. Further scale, Star Destroyers are considerabley larger and contain a fleet of fights - something that starfleet does not have - fighter wings - they do have some, but not a dedicated carrier class ship.
It would be interesting though if starfleet were to make a Start Destroyer class warship = that could be more powerful, but its way out of what they usually produce. Teleporting tech though - that is something that has not been considered yet - would the empires shields compensate for it or not - and even if they did would they be able to hold out indefinatly.