| |
|
| | #1 (permalink) | |
| Wherever I Am, I'm There Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: Greater London
Posts: 11,421
| William Shatner Appearance? Quote:
On the other hand, UPN is not a charity, they can afford his demands, and they are using his appearance to boost flagging viewing figures, so he is entitled ask for a slice of that profit. Personally speaking, if it is necessary to pay him so much, stuff the viewing figures and the Kirk's ancestor story, and spend the money instead on the writers, special effects, locations and costumes. | |
| | |
| | #2 (permalink) |
| Registered User Join Date: Jun 2001 Location: Gwynedd
Posts: 3,579
| In fairness we don't know what the sum of money being discussed is. It could easily be UPN expects Shatner to appear for the love of the show, while he wants his bus fare there paid? On the otherhand Shatner is rumoured to be living in a trailer again after the Dot.Com bubble lost him his fortune again |
| | |
| | #3 (permalink) | ||||
| Wherever I Am, I'm There Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: Greater London
Posts: 11,421
| Quote:
I have a link here to the official William Shatner website, and the thread called "Spill the Beans": http://www.williamshatner.com/module...hlight=#205677 Bill Shatner posts: Quote:
What partly fuels this is that UPN has apparently already commisioned adverts advertising Shatner's appearance. This was on TrekWeb: Quote:
Quote:
| ||||
| | |
| | #4 (permalink) | |
| Registered User Join Date: Jun 2001 Location: Gwynedd
Posts: 3,579
| For something in the rumour and speculation mill, it does look as if they are rather relying upon Shatner being available Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #5 (permalink) |
| Tal Shiar Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: San Diego
Posts: 264
| Well, we're assuming that UPN hasn't contacted Shatner, after he mentioned payment, because UPN was reluctant... possibly. Or, it might be that they are simply trying to scrounge up the cash before saying "see ya at the set Bill". Reallocating dollars in a fixed budget is time consuming. Their pause could be for several different reasons. Also, let's face it... us humans rarely do things "professionally" for free. It's simply business to expect payment. If Shatner wants too much money, then we won't see him in Enterprise. No problem... that's just business:evil: . He should at least ask for the going rate of a major Trek actor PLUS some extra for legend status (plus the balance on his trailor mortgage - can't have Kirk living in a trailor). It's only fair! Right? |
| | |
| | #6 (permalink) |
| Wherever I Am, I'm There Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: Greater London
Posts: 11,421
| I don't know anything about the trailer park, but I do know that he has recorded a new Album out in October 2004. He has to be pretty desperate for cash to do that, as the last one in the sixties was the one with his version of 'Lucy in the Sky with Diamonds'. |
| | |
| | #8 (permalink) |
| Wherever I Am, I'm There Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: Greater London
Posts: 11,421
| Over here he's been doing 'All Bran' breakfast cereal radio ads. Also this is going off-topic but I heard a track from his new album on the radio. It was a cover of PULP's Common People and he also has Ben Folds and Ian Brodie (Lightning Seeds) involved. I have to say that it is a little unusual. The radio presenter said: "It's Pop, Jim, but not as we know it!" |
| | |
| | #9 (permalink) | ||
| Wherever I Am, I'm There Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: Greater London
Posts: 11,421
| This seems to confirm the Shatner side of things: Quote:
Quote:
| ||
| | |
| | #10 (permalink) | |
| Wherever I Am, I'm There Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: Greater London
Posts: 11,421
| Quote:
| |
| | |
|
| About | Link To Us | For Writers | For Publishers | Privacy | Terms of Use | Copyright | Press | XML/RSS | Contact Us © Copyright Science Fiction Fantasy Chronicles 2003-2008 |