The UK's largest Science Fiction & Fantasy Forums

Go Back   Science Fiction Fantasy Chronicles: forums > Discussion > Science / Nature



Science / Nature Messageboards for discussing all aspects of science, the environment of our world, and the scientific exploration of it.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rating: Thread Rating: 5 votes, 5.00 average.
Old 15th September 2004, 07:19 AM   #1 (permalink)
Super Moderator
 
littlemissattitude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,406
Blog Entries: 9
Bipedalism 2 million years older than thought?

According to National Geographic, bipedalism may have first appeared in hominids two million years earlier than paleontologists had thought:

Quote:
Computer analysis of a fossil thigh bone indicates that a chimp-size human-like creature walked on two legs as early as six million years ago. Walking on two legs, known as bipedalism, is considered by scientists to be a distinguishing characteristic in what sets humans apart from apes.

Until now, the most widely accepted date for the advent of bipedalism was about four million years ago. That's when the hominids known as Australopithecus anamensis, lived. Hominids include humans and extinct near humans.
You can find the entire article here.

If this turns out to be true, it should go a long way toward solving the problem of whether hominids developed intelligence because they could walk upright or walked upright because they developed intelligence.

One thing that I found very interesting in this article is that one scientist, Owen Lovejoy, has proposed the idea that bipedalism evolved as a reproductive strategy in that it allowed cooperative care and a division of labor. I don't know that I buy his theory, but it is an interesting approach.

Last edited by littlemissattitude; 15th September 2004 at 07:22 AM.. Reason: To fix link.
littlemissattitude is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th September 2004, 08:42 AM   #2 (permalink)
Admin and Tea-boy
 
I, Brian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 5,452
Blog Entries: 1
Re: Bipedalism 2 million years older than thought?

Nice article - now if only it would address the "Aquatic Ape" theory.
I, Brian is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:29 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.