| |||||||||
| General Book Discussion General Science Fiction Fantasy books and literature discussion. |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Rate Thread |
| | #17 (permalink) |
| Wherever I Am, I'm There Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 11,847
| Re: Steampunk?!!!! Thanks for the link to the other thread and for all these replies. There is more to this genre than I realised and I have loads of new ideas for reading now. I actually almost picked up Perdido Street Station before, and I certainly will now. Jeter's Morlock Nights and Infernal Machines are new to me. There is also something called Queen Victoria's Bomb by Ronald Clarke. Actually, would you class King David's Spaceship by Jerry Pournell as Steampunk? I think it should be. James Blaylock's Homunculus was published in 1986. Anyone else have a book anteceding that? Only that I used to read a lot of Michael Moorcock, and his Dancers at the End of Time and associated books featuring Jerry Cornelius and Mrs Amelia Underwood were published in the 1970's and have got to be a little bit Steampunk too? Last edited by Dave; 3rd November 2006 at 10:58 AM.. Reason: bad spelling |
| | |
| | #18 (permalink) |
| Moderator Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 9,468
| Re: Steampunk?!!!! By no means knowledgeable on that particular sub-genre, but if they aren't, they certainly were close predecessors to it, I'd think. After all, there are strong elements of what I understand it to be throughout the Dancers, and with the Victorian and Edwardian elements in the Cornelius books, and the alternate realities/time streams, I think it'd be a very close thing, at least... |
| | |
| | #19 (permalink) |
| Registered User Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 2,028
| Re: Steampunk?!!!! Paul di Filippo has also written a series of steampunk stories, collected in, er, The Steampunk Trilogy. I wouldn't describe Dancers at the End of Time as steampunk. As I understand it, the sub-genre is characterised by the presence of present-day technological innovations created using Victorian technology (particularly steam-driven). So, modern-day computing but using Babbage's analytical engines, as in The Difference Engine. |
| | |
| | #20 (permalink) |
| Registered User Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 591
| Re: Steampunk?!!!! SciFan: Science Fiction & Fantasy Books by Theme: Steampunk (novels, anthologies, short story collections, non fiction)= Scifan listing of Steampunk books. |
| | |
| | #22 (permalink) | |
| Registered User Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 2,028
| Re: Steampunk?!!!! Quote:
Ah well, it seems Damon Knight was right after all: [steampunk] means what we point to when we say it... | |
| | |
| | #24 (permalink) |
| Registered User Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 2,028
| Re: Steampunk?!!!! Um, wikipedia lists Pasquale's Angel as a steampunk novel on List of steampunk works - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Maybe I'm just a purist and prefer Jeter's original comment: "Personally, I think Victorian fantasies are going to be the next big thing, as long as we can come up with a fitting collective term for Powers, Blaylock and myself. Something based on the appropriate technology of the era; like "steampunks," perhaps..." :-) Having said that, whenever a new movement or sub-genre is identified, there are plenty of people who are eager and willing to jam all sorts of disparate works into it... |
| | |
| | #25 (permalink) | |
| Moderator Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 6,134
| Re: Steampunk?!!!! Quote:
EDIT: Looks like iansales has clarified things further... To clarify Blaylock published to my knowledge his first St Ives story back in '86 so unless he published a St. Ives story pre '79 I'm not clear on what you mean unless you're referring to pre-publication or a published story earlier again? | |
| | |
| | #26 (permalink) |
| Fierce Vowelless One Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,670
| Re: Steampunk?!!!! Neal Stephenson's Baroque books aren't steampunk (at least in my mind) but would probably appeal to those who like steampunk. I'm sure there is a logical explanation why but at the moment I can't think of a thing. Sheesh. Someone put out an APB for my brain willya? |
| | |
| | #27 (permalink) | |
| Goblin Princess | Re: Steampunk?!!!! Quote:
The term Steampunk (like Urban Fantasy) is one that some people use very loosely indeed, while others try to narrow it down to the point where the very books it was originally coined to describe would be excluded. Interestingly (or at least it interests me) the list of influences and precursors on sites like this one http://republika.pl/steampunk/chrono02.html tends to a lot of overlap with the influences and precursors of Fantasy of Manners, another subgenre that was much discussed back in the late eighties and early nineties. | |
| | |
| | #28 (permalink) | |
| Wherever I Am, I'm There Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 11,847
| Re: Steampunk?!!!! Quote:
We shouldn't really argue over definitions of genres as it is a fairly pointless exercise. | |
| | |
| | #29 (permalink) | |
| Moderator Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 6,134
| Re: Steampunk?!!!! Quote:
I've got that site in my favourites but I've never heard of the sub genre Fantasy Of Manners. Looks like you were very much aware of it though going on this article on Wikipedia. Fantasy of manners - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia | |
| | |
| | #30 (permalink) |
| Goblin Princess | Re: Steampunk?!!!! Ah yes. That article on FoM serves as a good reminder that nothing we say on the internet is ever private. I traced that citation (which like everything else in the Wikipedia turns up elsewhere as well) back to a discussion on a private/paid-subscribers-only bulletin board eight or nine years ago. Little did I know that anything I said would be quoted as though I was some sort of authority on the subject. Fortunately, it wasn't anything I wouldn't want repeated. |
| | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Rate This Thread | |
| |