Science Fiction Fantasy
Science Fiction & Fantasy Portal:   |  HOME   |  FORUM   |   Other forums   |

 


Go Back   Science Fiction Fantasy Chronicles: forums > Film & TV > Featured Films > Lord of the Rings
Register Forum RULES Members List Gallery Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread
Old 25th July 2007, 12:57 PM   #31 (permalink)
ilweran
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: UK: WALES:
Posts: 1
Re: Mistake in the first movie?

Quote:
Originally Posted by areader View Post
Possibly the knives were dwarf made as Bilbo got it from Thorin and were different altogether. Its probably not so much an error as a common belief about them.
The two swords, Orcrist and Glamdring, and Sting were from the Trolls cave in the Hobbit and were made in Gondolin in the First Age. They were definitely made by elves.

Berens knife broke because he tried to get a second Silmaril and it wasn't his fate to get more than one of them.
ilweran is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th July 2007, 02:08 PM   #32 (permalink)
Carpe Diem
Homicidal Tendencies..?
 
Carpe Diem's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Slovakia (Slovak Republic)
Posts: 27
Re: Mistake in the first movie?

Well i think that the reason only Sting glowed was the fact that they tryed to make it unique! Frodo had to have SOMETHING special about him, after all he was the guy who was to carry the ring, so he had the mithril shirt thing and Sting; the only sword that glowed.
Carpe Diem is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26th July 2007, 11:05 AM   #33 (permalink)
Sirathiel
Spy with looks and guts
 
Sirathiel's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Germany
Posts: 306
Re: Mistake in the first movie?

You people make me want to re-read... But that will have to wait till I get home.

I have to agree with Carpe Diem though. They word it nicely.

On the other hand, Gandalf is - to me - almost as important as Frodo. Where would they all be without him? And he is - by definition even - something rare and special. Well,... I'll be back with some quotes tonight.
~Sira.

PS: Wee... one of the threads I posted in back when!
Sirathiel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th July 2007, 11:13 AM   #34 (permalink)
paranoid marvin
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Lancashire
Posts: 190
Re: Mistake in the first movie?

In my opinion Gollum is the most important and influential character - I think JRR had plans for hm right from the start , as , with hindsight , it seems odd that such a strong and unusual character should play such a seemingly minor role in The Hobbit
paranoid marvin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th August 2007, 01:34 PM   #35 (permalink)
Gothic_Angelica
Registered User
 
Gothic_Angelica's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Flintshire
Posts: 91
Re: Mistake in the first movie?

I didn't think about it/didn't notice it.
Gothic_Angelica is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th October 2007, 10:35 AM   #36 (permalink)
Sirathiel
Spy with looks and guts
 
Sirathiel's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Germany
Posts: 306
Re: Mistake in the first movie?

Well, I can't give you the actual quotes since I'm at work. But I am currently re-reading the books and can herewith confirm that it is mentioned in the chapter "A Journey in the dark" (or the one right after... not sure how far I got last night) that Gandalf's blade is Glamdring and that Glamdring, Orcrist and Sting all glow in a cold light in the presence of orcs.

Why they left it out of the film... no idea.
Sirathiel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th October 2007, 10:48 AM   #37 (permalink)
pyan
Moderator
 
pyan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Hampshire
Posts: 4,227
Re: Mistake in the first movie?

Quote:
Originally Posted by paranoid marvin View Post
In my opinion Gollum is the most important and influential character - I think JRR had plans for hm right from the start , as , with hindsight , it seems odd that such a strong and unusual character should play such a seemingly minor role in The Hobbit
It's because LOTR was written, in the main, after The Hobbit was published and widely read - and it would have been extremely difficult to boost Gollum's part in that book to match up to his importance in LOTR.

JRRT did do a major revision in the original story of The Hobbit to alter the story of how Bilbo got the Ring in the first place - for the second edition, he re-wrote Gollum to take out the idea that he would ever have offered to give Bilbo the Ring. This jibed with the hold that the Ring had on Gollum, so it was altered to emphasise the sheer power and importance of it which would be brought out in LOTR.
pyan is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:34 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0 ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.

About | Link To Us | For Writers | For Publishers | Privacy | Terms of Use | Copyright | Press | XML/RSS | Contact Us

© Copyright Science Fiction Fantasy Chronicles 2003-2008