| |
|
| |||||||
| Star Wars The Star Wars movies: original trilogy and new prelude trilogy. |
| View Poll Results: Take my Banshee Arbiter? | |||
Yes | | 1 | 20.00% |
| No :'( | | 0 | 0% |
| It is a nice Banshee... | | 2 | 40.00% |
| I'll buy it instead! | | 0 | 0% |
| What's an Arbiter? | | 1 | 20.00% |
| What's a Banshee? | | 0 | 0% |
I'd rather Walk | | 0 | 0% |
| I'd rather die! :flash: | | 0 | 0% |
| Why don't you take it? | | 1 | 20.00% |
| Voters: 5. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Rate Thread |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| Save Angel! Join Date: Jun 2001 Location: Edinburgh
Posts: 3,638
| Prequel Poll: Who was the better Anakin? Uber moppet Jake Lloyd or hunky (apparently) Hayden Christensen? I wanted to string the little kid in TPM up - I think it was terrible casting, and there were only a few moments in the film when he wasn't absolutely hateful - for example when he was leaving Shmi, I still tear up at that scene. The portrayal of Anakin in AOTC was much more satisfying. I think in this case, any distaste I had for Anakin was based in the cocky petulance of the character, and not the way he was portrayed, so I think HC gets my vote. |
| |
| | #2 (permalink) |
| Lookin Good Join Date: Jun 2001 Location: Washington State
Posts: 1,872
| A lot of people didn't like the way Hayden portrayed Anikan and while there were some things that bugged me I can't be sure it wasn't just the character and maybe the way he was directed. I've seen him in things before and he's not that bad an actor. I however did not really like Jake. Nothing against the kid but his portrayal left me totally cold towards the character so I also went with Hayden on this. |
| |
| | #3 (permalink) |
| Electronic Waymon Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: Texas
Posts: 227
| I really didn't like either of them. I grew to accept them as Anakin and appreciated the story for what it was. Take solice that they didn't detract from the movie too much. I LOVED AOTC so I guess he couldn't have been that bad!!! |
| |
| | #6 (permalink) |
| Save Angel! Join Date: Jun 2001 Location: Edinburgh
Posts: 3,638
| Okay - you didn't like the portrayal, but could have it been done better? What would the difference have been? I think it would be a hard role for anyone to try, simply because of the 'history' that we all already know. |
| |
| | #7 (permalink) |
| Electronic Waymon Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: Texas
Posts: 227
| Well, let me take a little step back and say I was put off by Anakin and his obvious psychological problems. In that respect...maybe Christensen did a good job! I may grow to love his portrayal. |
| |
| | #8 (permalink) |
| Save Angel! Join Date: Jun 2001 Location: Edinburgh
Posts: 3,638
| Psychological problems - it is obvious that he had serious problems from a very early age - what Anakin doomed from the beginning? Could it have been any other way? The force and jedi training aside, it almost seems that Anakin's background was ever destined to doom him. Or is that just modern day pseudo-psychology speaking? |
| |
| | #9 (permalink) |
| Shipper Queen Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: Devon
Posts: 1,491
| I had to choose Hayden as firstly The Phantom Menace was weak film and i didn't particularly like Anakin, he was a little bit annoying. Hayden's acting did seem a little dead at times but that could be representing his psychological problems . I guess what tipped it over is that i think Hayden's pretty cute!! Trust me to go for the looks! |
| |
| | #10 (permalink) | |
| Lookin Good Join Date: Jun 2001 Location: Washington State
Posts: 1,872
| Quote:
:blush: | |
| |
| | #13 (permalink) |
| Lookin Good Join Date: Jun 2001 Location: Washington State
Posts: 1,872
| I'm hoping so too, although it seems that they tend to leave a lot of that kind of stuff to the watchers imagination so we'll just have to wait and see. oh and RANT! RANT! RANT! :rolly2: |
| |
| | #14 (permalink) | |
| Ultimate J/A shipper! Join Date: Feb 2001 Location: Southern California
Posts: 2,423
| But you finally got my vote on this one, too. And here's the rant: Quote:
Problem with this is, I don't think it's all Jake's fault. There were times in AOTC that even Natalie's performance was flat and unemotional and that's all on Lucas. His directing is, at times, too heavy handed. His personality is all over these performances. I think Hayden could have been better, too, if there had been another director. Lucas is just too out of touch with today's audiences (today's world, really) and he's too much of a control freak to really allow these awesome performers to do what they do best. Natalie and Ewan are two of the best actors in the world right now, and I don't think they're really taken seriously anymore because of SW. Sad but true. And it's not them... it's Lucas.'Nuff ranting. Later. ![]() | |
| |
| | #15 (permalink) | |
| Save Angel! Join Date: Jun 2001 Location: Edinburgh
Posts: 3,638
| Re: Sorry I've been away so long... Quote:
Lucas's direction does badly misuse their talents though. Particularly in the first film, it seemed like such a waste. I have an amazing image of Lucas saying "No, no, no, give me less", I wonder how exactly he gets these performances from the actors, and how much is to do with the script. Are the actors allowed any input into the script at all? Could Lloyd's performance have been better with more skilled direction? Possibly I suppose... | |
| |
|
| About | Link To Us | For Writers | For Publishers | Privacy | Terms of Use | Copyright | Press | XML/RSS | Contact Us © Copyright Science Fiction Fantasy Chronicles 2003-2008 |