Tom Bombadil

[Ice fyre]

Hmmm, never contributed to this thread before but my suspicion is that Tom Bomabdil is in fact a very famous Scot. Billy Connely! He dances sings and makes merry a lot and most importantly he has been known to wear BIG YELLOW boots. Big boots shaped like bananas actually!

Umm they didnt actually discount him. In the extended edition when tree beard saves Merry and Pipin the poem he uses is actually from Tom Bombadil I dont know where or when.

[j. d. worthington]

Originally Posted by Ice fyre

Umm they didnt actually discount him. In the extended edition when tree beard saves Merry and Pipin the poem he uses is actually from Tom Bombadil I dont know where or when.

It's from the bit where he rescues the hobbits from Old Man Willow in the Forest....

[Boaz]

JRRT put much thought over many years into his cosmology of Eru and Arda. After he had categorized the Creator, the Ainur, the Valar and Maiar, the Enemies, the Quendi in all their subcategories, the Naugrim, the Ents, Humans and their subcategories, and all creatures great and small... did Professor Tolkien feel that his world was bereft of mysteries? Linguists, historians, adventurers, and readers of all types have fallen in love with Arda and have tried to systematize it. I confess, that I have.

I worked on making my own Tolkien dictionary until I discovered J.E.A. Tyler's The New Tolkien Companion in 1981. Then I lived vicariously through Tyler's painstaking work.

Perhaps Tom Bombadil is Tolkien's reminder that there are things out there beyond our ability to understand and categorize. Eru's plans and Eru's purposes are too deep too fathom. Inscrutable.

How much fun is it when the supernatural is conveniently systematized?

Have you ever played Dungeon and Dragons? So many players know the rulebooks on the Planes, the Monsters, and the Gods through and through. They cannot be surprised by anything the DM throws at them. And if the DM creates something totally new and homegrown, the players throw a fit and cry foul because this new entity is not covered in the official published systematic cosmology. I ask you, how much fun is that?

C.S. Lewis put it this way in The Last Battle, "Do you think I keep him in my wallet, fools?" said Tirian. "Who am I that I could make Aslan appear at my bidding? He's not a tame lion." The words not a tame lion are repeated throughout the the series, iirc. The point is that if we can figure out every aspect of the supernatural and every characteristic of the divine, then the supernatural and the divine are not really special. In other words, the supernatural is not super and the divine is all too human.

Tolkien and Lewis were human. Yet is seems to me that they were not the tamest of writers.

[j. d. worthington]

Originally Posted by Boaz

JRRT put much thought over many years into his cosmology of Eru and Arda. After he had categorized the Creator, the Ainur, the Valar and Maiar, the Enemies, the Quendi in all their subcategories, the Naugrim, the Ents, Humans and their subcategories, and all creatures great and small... did Professor Tolkien feel that his world was bereft of mysteries? Linguists, historians, adventurers, and readers of all types have fallen in love with Arda and have tried to systematize it. I confess, that I have.

Perhaps Tom Bombadil is Tolkien's reminder that there are things out there beyond our ability to understand and categorize. Eru's plans and Eru's purposes are too deep too fathom. Inscrutable.

How much fun is it when the supernatural is conveniently systematized?
C.S. Lewis put it this way in The Last Battle, "Do you think I keep him in my wallet, fools?" said Tirian. "Who am I that I could make Aslan appear at my bidding? He's not a tame lion." The words not a tame lion are repeated throughout the the series, iirc. The point is that if we can figure out every aspect of the supernatural and every characteristic of the divine, then the supernatural and the divine are not really special. In other words, the supernatural is not super and the divine is all too human.

Tolkien and Lewis were human. Yet is seems to me that they were not the tamest of writers.

While no believer in the supernatural, nonetheless I hold the numinous in high regard, as it represents a very important emotional state; those who can genuinely feel the presence of the numinous or the sublime tend to be much more aware of the richness, subtleties, and texure of life, language, and thought. Certainly Tolkien and Lewis were well aware of this, and used it in their works. I'm not sure I'd put Bombadil in that category, but he may represent something equally subtle and complex.

As for the general idea of that which is symbolic of the numinous, your post reminded me of a passage from Edgar Allan Poe's "Spirits of the Dead" which has always seemed to me to represent the idea very well:

The breeze, the breath of God, is still,
And the mist upon the hill
Shadowy, shadowy, yet unbroken,
Is a symbol and a token.
How it hangs upon the trees,
A mystery of mysteries!

[Rahl Windsong]

Personally I think Tom was put in to make the reader think and to create discussions like this one at some later date. On purpose JRRT left it up to our own imaginations to figure out why, what exactly he is.

[Connavar]

Tom Bomabdil was very interesting in the part i have read him so far. Havent finished the first book yet. Dont know if he appears again.


He saved me from the overly descriptive forest traveling that was so slow that it was driving me crazy

He was so strange and enigmatic that my interest in him peaked and made me go through the slow parts of the book easier.

[Hilarious Joke]

That's strange, I actually really enjoyed the beginning journey from Bag End to Rivendell. I thought there was an innocent simplicity about it - it was sort of a rollicking adventure, and then they got to Rivendell and things got all grand and weighty. So originally I was a bit disappointed they left a lot of that out of the movie.

But I do love the movies .

[dekket]

I was very disappointed that Tom and the Barrow-wights were left out of the movies.

[Connavar]

I have to say that was lame too.

They had in the movie alot of the semi boring random traveling but not Tom and Barrow-weights which was interesting.


Hilarious Joke :

It was good read when it was about Hobbish history,their villages etc but when they came into the forest, way too much info about how the forest looked. Like he had describe every millimeter.