| |
|
| | #62 (permalink) |
| Moderator Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: Hampshire
Posts: 4,322
| Re: For young women only? 'Anne McCaffrey is the Barbara Cartland of science fiction.' Kingsley Amis. Re-reading some of the books a few years on, I think he has a point, but I can remember loving them years ago, and eagerly waiting for the next Pern novel to be issued. Nowadays I cringe at some of the dialogue, and as it has been said, her continuity is atrocious.I also don't like her milking old stories by retelling them from another viewpoint - I thought Masterharper of Pern was dreadful. Perhaps it's an age/experience thing - as you read more, you get more critical of bad style and writing, and become fussier about plotting, style and content. Sorry to sound so negative; the truth is I was saddened not to enjoy re-reading books of which I had such fond memories. |
| | |
| | #63 (permalink) | |
| Damsel in this dress Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 2,763
| Re: For young women only? Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #64 (permalink) |
| Gwahir Join Date: May 2007 Location: Hampshire
Posts: 18
| Re: For young women only? I think that there's a odd (and wrong!) received wisdom that girls will read books about boys, but not the other way round - that's surely true only if the book is marketed badly? The feminist in me always had difficulty with Gold rider not being the weyr leader, more so now than when I first read them. Does this make them more girly or more for boys?? (I have terrible trouble not seeing people as people first...) |
| | |
| | #65 (permalink) |
| Rider of golden Darith ;) Join Date: May 2007 Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 18
| Re: For young women only? first of all, i think that is a wicked joke...i know plenty of people(males included) who are mccaffrey fans, especially to Pern. second, i also have a ditty with the goldrider being second to the weyrleader...its her gold that his bronze needs to fly! |
| | |
| | #66 (permalink) |
| Lady of Autumn Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Lincolnshire
Posts: 3,328
| Re: For young women only? I can see why people would assume this, but having re-read the books recently I still can't see anything in them that would single them out as being specifically for young women. |
| | |
| | #68 (permalink) |
| Iucunditas condeco vos. Join Date: May 2007 Location: Missouri
Posts: 255
| Re: For young women only? Well I am a girl and young, but I can't see Pern being just for young women either. Really who hasn't dreamed of riding a dragon? I think this appeals to many people. |
| | |
| | #69 (permalink) |
| Transmural Feline Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Finland
Posts: 581
| Re: For young women only? Yeah. My main gripe with the McCaffrey books these days is that we get very few ambivalent characters. She does write about strong women, but even these are usually tamed by finding a husband and starting a family (Menolly, even Lessa to a certain extent). Women who enjoy sex for its own sake or as a means to manipulate men rather than as a means to starting a family are evil (Kylara, Avril Bitra), while the virginal monogamists are good (Brekke, who lost her dragon more or less because she was horrified at the thought of having sex with anyone except F'nor, who all but raped her at their first sexual encounter!). No, I don't consider AMC's women as healthy role models for youngsters. They're fun to read, I grant you that, but AMC is not, and never has been, a feminist. Any more than Barbara Cartland is. |
| | |
| | #70 (permalink) |
| Iucunditas condeco vos. Join Date: May 2007 Location: Missouri
Posts: 255
| Re: For young women only? I see your point, but you must look at the time in which Mccaffrey grew up. Times were much much different then. Perhaps (and this is just an idea) this accounts for how she portrays her female characters? |
| | |
| | #71 (permalink) |
| Transmural Feline Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Finland
Posts: 581
| Re: For young women only? It may explain some of it, but not all. Of course, she's only grown lazier as she grows older, in the sense that her characters tend to be even more one-dimensional now than they were when she was younger. |
| | |
| | #72 (permalink) |
| Iucunditas condeco vos. Join Date: May 2007 Location: Missouri
Posts: 255
| Re: For young women only? Yeah i didn't mean it as an excuse just maybe a point to consider. But i believe no matter what time you are born in you should be able to create good characters male or female. I'll have to take your word on the new books. |
| | |
|
| About | Link To Us | For Writers | For Publishers | Privacy | Terms of Use | Copyright | Press | XML/RSS | Contact Us © Copyright Science Fiction Fantasy Chronicles 2003-2008 |