| |
|
| |||||||
| Star Wars The Star Wars movies: original trilogy and new prelude trilogy. |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Rate Thread |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| Wherever I Am, I'm There Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: Greater London
Posts: 11,440
| Origins of Star Wars Saga (Salon article) Salon has an article arguing that Star Wars is much more a product of 20th Century pulp SciFi, than of the legends, myths and the classic mythological motifs that George Lucas claims it is: http://www.salon.com/ent/movies/feat...cas/index.html Interesting reading. |
| | |
| | #3 (permalink) |
| Wherever I Am, I'm There Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: Greater London
Posts: 11,440
| I'd never heard of him either, and still don't have a clue who he is. But, before I read that article, I didn't know 'Star Wars' was supposed to be a tale of 'comparitive mythology' either. To me it was always closer to 'Buck Rogers' and 'Flash Gordon' than it was to 'The Odyssey'. I used to watch 'Flash Gordon' serials on TV. He would visit an 'ice' planet, a 'forest' planet and a planet 'in the clouds'. This immediately sprang to mind when I saw the original trilogy. And 'Tatooine' IS 'Arakis' minus the sandworms. |
| | |
| | #4 (permalink) |
| Blondishness Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 590
| I have NO clue what Arakis is... But wouldn't the sarlaac be a "type" of sandworm? albeit stationary... Oh...and I never thought of it as being 'mythological' in origins either. *shrug* Now...you COULD relate stuff in it to mythology but I don't think that was the main purpose. |
| | |
| | #7 (permalink) | |
| Wherever I Am, I'm There Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: Greater London
Posts: 11,440
| I've found out who Joseph Campbell was: http://new.smh.com.au/articles/2002/...002387791.html The articles' author has also gone into great detail about the origin of some of the elements of the plot. Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #8 (permalink) |
| Explorer Join Date: Apr 2001 Location: New York
Posts: 621
| Dave, Very cool list! I've seen The Hidden Fortress and there are definately similarities. The droids is the most obvious (the 2 actors act just like them even down to them going separate ways like on Tatoinne. Also, the way they transition from scene to scene is the same (like when Luke and Ben lift up C3PO and the screen changes from bottom to top). It was very cool. Have you seen the movie? If not you should definately check it out. The subtitles are a bit annoying but I got used to thm pretty quick. |
| | |
| | #9 (permalink) | |
| Save Angel! Join Date: Jun 2001 Location: Edinburgh
Posts: 3,638
| Quote:
Good to have all the similarities spelled out like that, but it does make me wonder just how much research Lucas really did in the creation of his saga. Fair enough, he has mentioned the 'nods' to Kirosawa, but there really are quite a lot of different other references. He probably read The Lord of The Rings and the Dune books, but I am not sure how much he would actually have gone "I know, Frank Herbert had a really neat idea there, I am going to steal it." I like to give writers and artists some leeway when it comes to 'original' fiction or creations, after all there can only be so many original ideas (I think I read somewhere that there are only seven basic plots that any story can be based around), and as anyone who has tried to come up with something even a little bit original will know, it is easy to plagiarise unconsciously, by a kind of cultural 'osmosis'. As far as I can tell, at no point has Lucas actually tried to take credit for creating something devastatingly orginal, that angle has been foisted upon the saga by fans and critics. | |
| | |
| | #10 (permalink) | ||
| Wherever I Am, I'm There Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: Greater London
Posts: 11,440
| Quote:
Quote:
| ||
| | |
| | #11 (permalink) |
| Odi et amo et- CRUCIO! Join Date: Oct 2000 Location: Manchester. UK. Or near as dammit.
Posts: 4,670
| *grin* Whilst I could see that most of them would be likely sources... the Jonah and the Whale thing does seem a little... well, unlikely to be the full reason... I don't know about timings, but was Pinnocchio before or after ANH? *g* Throught literary history there has been a number of 'formulae' if you will, Oddyssey-types, Revenge-types, etc etc and you'd struggle not to find ressonances of something in any piece of work, whether the creator had even seen/read/heard of the original or not! But it does seem he mad more than a passing glance at Kurosawa's stuff *g* That was an interesting read, thanks, Dave! |
| | |
| | #12 (permalink) |
| Member Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 57
| the dead waters if the truth about the writing technique to wich star wars was born was ever truelly validated then you may haVE A DIFFERENT ARGUEMENT:THAT BEING SHOULD RECIPRICATIONS THAT WRITERS PREEMINATE DO THE ILL JUSTICE THAT ONE VICE OF ELABORATIONS OR STREAMING CREATIVITY IS BELIED VIA A SOURCE WHATSOEVER.I SHOULD SAY,THE BETTER PART OF JEDI POWERS HAVE TAKEN EVERY IMAGINABLE INTREST OF THE GREAT SCI FI FIGHTER OR KNIGHT AND SHACKLED INNOCENECE ,GREAT REFINED EFFECTAUTIONS,AND TRUST(THAT OF THE VIEWER THAt no real threat to the light sides order exists as sure as life within Corsacant,hoth<tattoine etc. review premise with the preview of littany :knowledge the great jedi exist:to speak of them is justice:the order exists in regard in any wich way).Finally /if myths were as regressive in their mirror of future films as they originally have been in mythology then evry turn of finer science fiction writing is lost>For example to loathe the unseen but spoken of isnt a fruity journey to conflict as with most myth,but a etching at the great counterplay that exists in sci fi to shunt brash telltale lost fortunes and eventually bring the triumph of character and quest as elaborations check and recheck eachother with mighty attunements that take pace and pretext to the interpretors lifes asperation as fan of sci fi and perciever that justly enjoys fine adventure.No there's a great leap of cohesive elements form star wars to predescesors,like mythological old teachers,dark veiled emporers,shy true maidens,and finally the themes of ritcheous over those with questionable intentions |
| | |
| | #13 (permalink) |
| Ultimate J/A shipper! Join Date: Feb 2001 Location: Southern California
Posts: 2,423
| Actually, in college, I did a lot of research on Carl Jung who in turn did a lot of his research based on Joseph Campbell's works, so I was really familiar with the archetypes that Lucas used. The essay I wrote connecting Star Wars with myth got me the highest grade that semester. Campbell's point in all this is that NO ONE ELEMENT in myth is unique any more. Every culture on Earth shares archetypal elements within it's mythos and religion. THAT'S what GL was using, that's why he said Campbell was his biggest inspiration, his "Yoda" when writing SW. Sure there are elements in SW and Kirusawa's films (Seven Samurai as well as The Hidden Fortress) but that's because Kirusawa ROCKS and GL knows it. Hell, I borrowed from GL when I started writing, but later made the characters and situations more my own. People will still see similarities, but that's the "magic of myth." I already know about the archetypes of the Shadow (Vader), the maiden (Leia), the hero (Han, stage 1, Luke, stage 4), the teacher (Obi-Wan, Yoda) and others, but that doesn't mean that I won't have some variant of each in my own work. What if I make the maiden a guy instead of a chick, and the hero a chick? I've changed elements, but only in the details, not the essential archetypal role of each. GL is an educated man. Of course, he's gonna use that education. Good to see that you guys enjoyed reading the Campbell stuff. It's very interesting reading. BTW, gravityvaliance... could you break up your posts a bit? One long paragraph with little punctuation makes getting your point difficult. If you were speaking to us, verbally, we'd be able to hear the intonations, but since we're reading, we have to infere them from your punctuation, grammer, and form. THANKS! |
| | |
| | #14 (permalink) |
| Odi et amo et- CRUCIO! Join Date: Oct 2000 Location: Manchester. UK. Or near as dammit.
Posts: 4,670
| I know this might wander a bit from topic BUT... Just how much variation can you have? There are only so many things that can happen, if you look at the barest elements, and so many times things can happen. And if you are surrounded by it, then particular traits in common seem magnified-- and then they seem more like generic chars than they would really. Erm... my thoughts, anyway! |
| | |
|
| About | Link To Us | For Writers | For Publishers | Privacy | Terms of Use | Copyright | Press | XML/RSS | Contact Us © Copyright Science Fiction Fantasy Chronicles 2003-2008 |