Science Fiction Fantasy
Science Fiction & Fantasy Portal:   |  HOME   |  FORUM   |   Other forums   |

 


Go Back   Science Fiction Fantasy Chronicles: forums > Books and Writing > Authors > J R R Tolkien
Register Blogs Forum RULES Members List Gallery Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

J R R Tolkien The works of JRR Tolkien


Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
Old 23rd January 2002, 08:54 PM   #1 (permalink)
Odi et amo et- CRUCIO!
 
Skip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Manchester. UK. Or near as dammit.
Posts: 4,670
Changes made in the film.... MAY CONTAIN SPOILERS

By definition, this may contain book spoilers.


So, what do you think about inclusions/exclusions? Anything you think we didn't need?
Skip is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd January 2002, 09:21 PM   #2 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Gwynedd
Posts: 3,582
I think the loss of Tom Bombadil and the adventures upto Bree is a great shame, but probably not a great loss to the overall film.

LOTR is not a simple novel- it is an epic of three 200K word volumes- Each volume is more than twice the size of an average novel. Something had to give. The fun comes in trimming the Two Towers. There is much less to lose.
ray gower is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd January 2002, 09:31 PM   #3 (permalink)
Odi et amo et- CRUCIO!
 
Skip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Manchester. UK. Or near as dammit.
Posts: 4,670
I think the same. Sad as it is, they weren't central. There is going to be a right old butcher job in TT if they take ANYthing out really. But IMHO

SPOILER- TWO TWOERS


The journeys will suffer most. Esp the Aragorn/Legolas/Gimli one. And Merry, Pippin and the Uruk-Hai will be condensed I reckon.
But did they say TT would be longer?
Skip is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd January 2002, 09:32 PM   #4 (permalink)
lost in Time
 
Asmiley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Illinois
Posts: 9,373
Quote:
Originally posted by ray gower
I think the loss of Tom Bombadil and the adventures upto Bree is a great shame, but probably not a great loss to the overall film.

LOTR is not a simple novel- it is an epic of three 200K word volumes- Each volume is more than twice the size of an average novel. Something had to give. The fun comes in trimming the Two Towers. There is much less to lose.
yeah if they try and cut one or another part of that they will regret it cuz the story would not make much sense then.
Asmiley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd January 2002, 09:33 PM   #5 (permalink)
lost in Time
 
Asmiley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Illinois
Posts: 9,373
Quote:
Originally posted by Skip
I think the same. Sad as it is, they weren't central. There is going to be a right old butcher job in TT if they take ANYthing out really. But IMHO
But did they say TT would be longer?
True true. I don't think there's been an amount of time for the next one given.
Asmiley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th January 2002, 04:56 AM   #6 (permalink)
R.I.P. Ashes
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,798
When I first saw the film I was a little dissapointed by the addition of Lurtz, but as I saw it again I came to like his inclusion into the story. Still not entirely sure why.

The only thing I missed from the movie, apart from scenes that were cut, was the lack of songs. With the only one they included being the one that Bilbo and Gandalf both sang.
Shaun is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th January 2002, 07:25 AM   #7 (permalink)
R.I.P. Ashes
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,798
Here's Peter Jacksons thoughts on putting Bombadil in the movie:
"What we did contemplate," Jackson recalled, "and it was really for the fans, was to have the hobbits walking through the Old Forest and to see a feathered cap come darting through the trees, to hear the sound of Tom Bombadil's voice and son and then have the hobbits turn and run away as fast as they could!(he laughed) We thought (that)would acknowledge Tom Bombadil in an affectionate-joke kind of way. We didn't have time to do it."
Shaun is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th January 2002, 11:24 AM   #8 (permalink)
Odi et amo et- CRUCIO!
 
Skip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Manchester. UK. Or near as dammit.
Posts: 4,670
Yeah I really wanted more songs. Amd elven songs too
Skip is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th January 2002, 07:26 PM   #9 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Gwynedd
Posts: 3,582
The problem with Elven songs is that JRRT only hinted at feelings of what the Elves were actually singing about. Though I suspect they would have been closer to 'Ave Maria' or 'Ar Bydd a Heraeth' than the latest Boy-Z-one or whatever currently passes for music.

Bilbo's walking songs were, on the otherhand, fairly straight forward in construction and the refrain will could match any number of well known standard country tunes.
ray gower is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th January 2002, 07:39 PM   #10 (permalink)
Odi et amo et- CRUCIO!
 
Skip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Manchester. UK. Or near as dammit.
Posts: 4,670
BUT wouldn't they be really great to hear? The one in Lorien sounded great

Another thing I regretted was the Legolas/Gimli relationship. They really didn't play much on it at all. Just a few more words i think and it would have highlighted it, if only slightly
Skip is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th January 2002, 08:00 PM   #11 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Gwynedd
Posts: 3,582
The Gimli/Legolas thing does not really develop until Twin Towers. In fact, for all his popularity here, Legolas does/saids very little. It could be a primer for exclusion in the next part?
ray gower is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th January 2002, 08:14 PM   #12 (permalink)
Odi et amo et- CRUCIO!
 
Skip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Manchester. UK. Or near as dammit.
Posts: 4,670
True but from Lothlorien.... when they get there.. to the boats.....
There was no real enmity or even a sense of not being that good friends at any point in FOTR. And so later doesnt have the same significance. But I agree. Not that he had a huge part in the books, either.
Skip is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th January 2002, 03:38 AM   #13 (permalink)
lost in Time
 
Asmiley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Illinois
Posts: 9,373
yeah they did have a close bond starting in lothorien they didn't really have before then. In the books anyway. Gimli's part was very low key in the movie. he did the axe seen and there wasn't a blindfolded problem to get to Lothorien or maybe his part would have been bigger. I mean in that first book the main part just before Lothorien could have been better.

So they really had no time to put in Bombadill? How dissapointing. Oh well at least they thought of it.
Asmiley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th January 2002, 05:36 AM   #14 (permalink)
R.I.P. Ashes
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,798
About the songs, they could have at least put in that song Frodo sang in Bree. You know the one with the cow jumping over the moon and a cat playing a fiddle .

I really hope Gimli gets a bigger part in the next two movies, as he was one of my favourite ( he's in my top ten from the books ). Atleast he had some good parts in "The Mines of Moria".
Shaun is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th January 2002, 06:20 PM   #15 (permalink)
aka Padfoot
 
Jessa's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: can't remember. if i don't know if i'm human, what makes u think i can remember where i live?
Posts: 3,424
i think all will be brillient...........all already is brillient!
Jessa is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:56 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.

About | Link To Us | For Writers | For Publishers | Privacy | Terms of Use | Copyright | Press | XML/RSS | Contact Us

© Copyright Science Fiction Fantasy Chronicles 2003-2008