| |
|
| | #1 (permalink) |
| Administrator Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 960
| Arthur C Clarke Well, I quite loved "2001". But I'm very wary about sequels. Anyone read much of his writing? Are the sequels up to scratch or a cash in? How about Rama? Any other novels recommended as among the best of Arthur C Clarke? |
| | |
| | #4 (permalink) |
| Administrator Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 960
| Re:Arthur C Clarke My physics teacher once made us watch "2010" on the last days of one term. ![]() I saw it knocking around on DVD recently, but it was simply a direct lift from video, so I left it. "2010" was a good film - an enjoyable film - but really I'm not sure that "2001" ever needed a sequel. My suspicion is that the sequels were derived primarily for commerical, rather than artisitc, reasons. No doubt that will cause unintended offense to the Clarke fans - I am merely hypothesising here. ![]() |
| | |
| | #7 (permalink) |
| cheap,flashy little crook Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,998
| Re: Arthur C Clarke I'd have to agree with that - althohgh later volumes lacked that mysterious unfolding, to an extent, they had a lot of fascinating ideas and even some spiritual speculations. I recently re-read Earthlight, one of his novels. While it wasn't an earth-shaking book, it was very thought provoking, if a bit slow-moving. Clarke is not a very visual writer, and action does not come easily to him - the big punch-up space battle in this book effectively takes place off-stage, as it is told to us from the point of view of two men who are watching the hole thing from a hidey-hole some distance away. Despite all this, its the stregth of his ideas that carries it through. Clarke is also good at working out clever plots with little twists in the tail. In many ways, I think he works best in short stories, where the core idea(s) he is exploring do not need to be burdened with too much story craft. The Nine Billion Names of God is a great example of this, and one of the best SF short stories I've ever read, btw. I'd say his weaknesses are common to most of his contemporaries, while the strenght of his concepts easily places him among the first ranks. |
| | |
| | #8 (permalink) |
| evolved Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 74
| Re: Arthur C Clarke Well some say the man was a scientific philospher first, and an author second. Considering he invented the geo-stationary orbit and that a lot of his theories have been used in first contact directives, they may well be right. If you liked Clarke, read somes Stephen Baxter and Ben Bova, two people he rated very highly. Personally, I think Baxter is a better writer than Clarke, but that's going out on a very big limb on a very big tree... |
| | |
| | #10 (permalink) |
| cheap,flashy little crook Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,998
| Re: Arthur C Clarke I'd actually agree with you on Baxter, Genus. His themes are very akin to Clarke's but his characters just seem a bit more alive. In fact, he's a regular collaborator with Clarke now. I've read a few Ben Bova shorts here and there, I ought to track down some of his books. |
| | |
| | #11 (permalink) |
| The Defiler's Rule Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 415
| Re: Arthur C Clarke I liked Beyond the Fall of Night. I think it the first part was an original novella by Clarke and the second part a collaboration, but I can't remember who co-authored it. I did like 2069 and 3001. I haven't read any of his other work yet, but I keep hearing good things about Rama all the time. |
| | |
| | #12 (permalink) |
| Junior Member Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 21
| Re: Arthur C Clarke I've read quite a few of his books, the fiction are good, but in the non fiction, I find he has quite a big head, saying how great he is. It's annoying, he may be good, but that's for others to find out, not for him to go telling everyone ![]() |
| | |
| | #13 (permalink) |
| Social Non-entity Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 29
| Re: Arthur C Clarke I'm absolutely burning through 2010 at the moment - reading as I post, despite the fact that I'm horribly tired - tomorrow morning will be the only chance that I have to get back to the library, so I need have finished it by then so I can return it and borrow 2061/3001. He's a fantastic writer! I'm rather enoying it. |
| | |
|
| About | Link To Us | For Writers | For Publishers | Privacy | Terms of Use | Copyright | Press | XML/RSS | Contact Us © Copyright Science Fiction Fantasy Chronicles 2003-2008 |